Abstract:Spectroscopy experiments are crucial to study membrane proteins for which traditional structure determination methods still prove challenging. Double electron-electron resonance (DEER) spectroscopy experiments provide protein residue-pair distance distributions that are indicative of their conformational heterogeneity. Atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are another tool that have been proven to be vital to study the structural dynamics of membrane proteins such as to identify inward-open, occluded, and outward-open conformations of transporter membrane proteins, among other partially open or closed states of the protein. Yet, studies have reported that there is no direct consensus between the distributional data from DEER experiments and MD simulations, which has challenged validation of structures obtained from long-timescale simulations and using simulations to design experiments. Current coping strategies for comparisons rely on heuristics, such as mapping the nearest matching peaks between two ensembles or biased simulations. Here we examine the differences in residue-pair distance distributions arising due to the choice of membranes around the protein and covalent modification of a pair of residues to nitroxide spin labels in DEER experiments. Through comparing MD simulations of two proteins, PepTSo and LeuT-both of which have been characterized using DEER experiments previously-we show that the proteins' dynamics are similar despite the choice of the detergent micelle as a membrane mimetic in DEER experiments. On the other hand, covalently modified residues show slight local differences in their dynamics and a huge divergence when the oxygen atom pair distances between spin labeled residues are measured rather than protein backbone distances. Given the computational expense associated with pairwise MTSSL labeled MD simulations, we examine the use of biased simulations to explore the conformational dynamics of the spin labels only to reveal that such simulations alter the underlying protein dynamics. Our study identifies the main cause for the mismatch between DEER experiments and MD simulations and will accelerate the development of potential mitigation strategies to improve the match.

A heart on the right can be more complex than it first appears

Ultrafast Bioorthogonal Spin-Labeling and Distance Measurements in Mammalian Cells Using Small, Genetically Encoded Tetrazine Amino Acids

Site-Directed Spin Labeling Measurements of Nanometer Distances in Nucleic Acids Using A Sequence-Independent Nitroxide Probe

Combining site-directed spin labeling in vivo and in-cell EPR distance determination

Spin Labels for 19F ENDOR Distance Determination: Resolution, Sensitivity and Distance Predictability

Reconciling membrane protein simulations with experimental DEER spectroscopy data

DEER-PREdict: Software for Efficient Calculation of Spin-Labeling EPR and NMR Data from Conformational Ensembles.

Determining Oligomeric Order of A Membrane Protein by Double Electron-Electron Resonance Spectroscopy

Cucurbit[7]uril Enhances Distance Measurements of Spin-Labeled Proteins

Sodium content and transport of white and red blood cells in undialysed uraemic and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Spin-labeled nanobodies as protein conformational reporters for electron paramagnetic resonance in cellular membranes

PELDOR to the Metal: Cu(II)-Based Labels Put a New Spin on Distance Measurements

Extending the Range of Distances Accessible by 19 F Electron-Nuclear Double Resonance in Proteins Using High-Spin Gd(III) Labels

Electron Spin Resonance of Single Molecules and Magnetic Interaction through Ligands

Modeling of Cu(II)-based Protein Spin Labels Using Rotamer Libraries

Endogenous Cu(II) Labeling for Distance Measurements on Proteins by EPR

Temperature-Dependent Rotation of Protonated Methyl Groups in Otherwise Deuterated Proteins Modulates DEER Distance Distributions

Nanometer distance measurements in RNA using site-directed spin labeling.

Computation of nitroxide-nitroxide distances in spin-labeled DNA duplexes.

Tailoring solid-state DNP methods to the study of α-synuclein LLPS

Extending the range of distances accessible by 19F electron-nuclear double resonance in proteins using high-spin Gd(III) labels