Abstract:In 2014, two groups of scientists published open letters on the efficacy of brain-training interventions, or “brain games,” for improving cognition. The first letter, a consensus statement from an international group of more than 70 scientists, claimed that brain games do not provide a scientifically grounded way to improve cognitive functioning or to stave off cognitive decline. Several months later, an international group of 133 scientists and practitioners countered that the literature is replete with demonstrations of the benefits of brain training for a wide variety of cognitive and everyday activities. How could two teams of scientists examine the same literature and come to conflicting “consensus” views about the effectiveness of brain training? In part, the disagreement might result from different standards used when evaluating the evidence. To date, the field has lacked a comprehensive review of the brain-training literature, one that examines both the quantity and the quality of the evidence according to a well-defined set of best practices. This article provides such a review, focusing exclusively on the use of cognitive tasks or games as a means to enhance performance on other tasks. We specify and justify a set of best practices for such brain-training interventions and then use those standards to evaluate all of the published peer-reviewed intervention studies cited on the websites of leading brain-training companies listed on Cognitive Training Data ( www.cognitivetrainingdata.org ), the site hosting the open letter from brain-training proponents. These citations presumably represent the evidence that best supports the claims of effectiveness. Based on this examination, we find extensive evidence that brain-training interventions improve performance on the trained tasks, less evidence that such interventions improve performance on closely related tasks, and little evidence that training enhances performance on distantly related tasks or that training improves everyday cognitive performance. We also find that many of the published intervention studies had major shortcomings in design or analysis that preclude definitive conclusions about the efficacy of training, and that none of the cited studies conformed to all of the best practices we identify as essential to drawing clear conclusions about the benefits of brain training for everyday activities. We conclude with detailed recommendations for scientists, funding agencies, and policymakers that, if adopted, would lead to better evidence regarding the efficacy of brain-training interventions.

Brain Training for Kids: Adding a Human Touch

Neural Plasticity Following Abacus Training in Humans: A Review and Future Directions.

Games as Cognitive Recreation: User Perspectives on Brain-Training Apps

The influence of digital educational games on preschool Children's creative thinking

Do “Brain-Training” Programs Work?

Digital Games for Young Children Ages Three to Six: From Research to Design

Using Thought-Provoking Children's Questions to Drive Artificial Intelligence Research

Designing Mobile EEG Neurofeedback Games for Children with Autism

Designing Mobile EEG Neurofeedback Games for Children with Autism: Implications from Industry Practice

The light side of gaming: creativity and brain plasticity

Do Young Chinese Children Gain Anthropomorphism after Exposure to Personified Touch-Screen and Board Games?

Video Game Design for Learning to Learn

Using games to understand the mind

Evaluating the Impact of a Targeted Approach Designed to Build Executive Function Skills: A Randomized Trial of Brain Games

Playing With Neuroscience: Past, Present and Future of Neuroimaging and Games

A Data-Driven, Player-Centric Approach to Evaluating Spatial Skill Training Games

Testing the Effectiveness of iPad Math Game: Lessons Learned from Running a Multi-Classroom Study

Playbook: An Animation-Based Game for Improving Children's Creativity and Problem Solving Skills

To learn scientifically, effectively, and enjoyably: A review of educational games

Online Games, Brain and Communication Ability

Brain Training Game Improves Executive Functions and Processing Speed in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial