Would you risk humanity's survival on a robot built in two years?

Robin R. Murphy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.adq6361

IF: 25

2024-06-27

Science Robotics

Abstract:Project Hail Mary reflects real-world technical readiness assessment processes for robotics.

robotics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Autonomous Military Robotics: Risk, Ethics, and Design

Patrick Lin,George Bekey,Keith Abney

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ada534697

2008-12-20

Abstract:Imagine the face of warfare with autonomous robotics: Instead of our soldiers returning home in flag-draped caskets to heartbroken families, autonomous robots-mobile machines that can make decisions, such as to fire upon a target, without human intervention-can replace the human soldier in an increasing range of dangerous missions: from tunneling through dark caves in search of terrorists, to securing urban streets rife with sniper fire, to patrolling the skies and waterways where there is little cover from attacks, to clearing roads and seas of improvised explosive devices (IEDs), to surveying damage from biochemical weapons, to guarding borders and buildings, to controlling potentially-hostile crowds, and even as the infantry frontlines. These robots would be 'smart' enough to make decisions that only humans now can; and as conflicts increase in tempo and require much quicker information processing and responses, robots have a distinct advantage over the limited and fallible cognitive capabilities that we Homo sapiens have. Not only would robots expand the battlespace over difficult, larger areas of terrain, but they also represent a significant force-multiplier-each effectively doing the work of many human soldiers, while immune to sleep deprivation, fatigue, low morale, perceptual and communication challenges in the 'fog of war', and other performance-hindering conditions.
Swift Trust in Mobile Ad Hoc Human-Robot Teams

Sanja Milivojevic,Mehdi Sobhani,Nicola Webb,Zachary Madin,James Ward,Sagir Yusuf,Chris Baber,Edmund R. Hunt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3686038.3686057

2024-08-19

Abstract:Integrating robots into teams of humans is anticipated to bring significant capability improvements for tasks such as searching potentially hazardous buildings. Trust between humans and robots is recognized as a key enabler for human-robot teaming (HRT) activity: if trust during a mission falls below sufficient levels for cooperative tasks to be completed, it could critically affect success. Changes in trust could be particularly problematic in teams that have formed on an ad hoc basis (as might be expected in emergency situations) where team members may not have previously worked together. In such ad hoc teams, a foundational level of 'swift trust' may be fragile and challenging to sustain in the face of inevitable setbacks. We present results of an experiment focused on understanding trust building, violation and repair processes in ad hoc teams (one human and two robots). Trust violation occurred through robots becoming unresponsive, with limited communication and feedback. We perform exploratory analysis of a variety of data, including communications and performance logs, trust surveys and post-experiment interviews, toward understanding how autonomous systems can be designed into interdependent ad hoc human-robot teams where swift trust can be sustained.

Robotics
Replacing Human Beings by Robots. How to Tackle that Perspective by Technology Assessment

Michael Decker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59702-2_7

2000-01-01

Abstract:Abstract‘May I help you?’, a friendly voice asks politely as one enters the main entrance of the hospital. The question was asked by a five feet tall robot which focuses on you with two digital cameras. Depending on your wishes the robot leads you to the emergency admission, to the patient you want to visit, or to the administration of the hospital. On the way to the emergency admission one meets robots that serve meals and feed patients, as well as autonomous wheelchairs that transport patients to different treatment or examination rooms. After physicians have finished their examination they ask a Software system to evaluate their diagnosis. Robots also dominate operating rooms. They assist in minimal invasive surgery, bore holes with high precision, cut tissue and sew the wound again, while the surgeon is sitting in a high-tech chair like a pilot and operates the robot with a joystick. In the intensive care unit all patients are monitored by robots that record blood pressure, pulse, oxygen level in the blood, etc., and are fed with information on the treatments the patient receives. From these data the robot can generate suggestions for further treatments.
An Engineer's Nightmare: 102 Years of Critical Robotics

Christopher Csíkszentmihályi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.04831

2022-05-10

Abstract:A critical and re-configured HRI might look to the arts, where another history of robots has been unfolding since the Czech artist Karel Capek's critical robotic labor parable of 1921, in which the word robot was coined in its modern usage. This paper explores several vectors by which artist-created robots, both physical and imaginary, have offered pronounced contrasts to robots-as-usual, and offers directions as to how these more emancipated cousins might be useful to the field of HRI.

Human-Computer Interaction,Robotics
Robotic lab techs

Alex Wilkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(24)00031-9

IF: 0.906

2024-01-06

The New Scientist

Abstract:Autonomous labs can perform experiments thousands of times faster than a human and they don't need to sleep. Are they the future, asks Alex Wilkins

multidisciplinary sciences
Integrating Risk in Humanoid Robot Control for Applications in the Nuclear Industry

Xianchao Long,Philip Long,Aykut Onol,Taskin Padir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.04814

2018-07-13

Abstract:This paper discuss the integration of risk into a robot control framework for decommissioning applications in the nuclear industry. Our overall objective is to allow the robot to evaluate a risk associated with several methods of completing the same task by combining a set of action sequences. If the environment is known and in the absence of sensing errors each set of actions would successfully complete the task. In this paper, instead of attempting to model the errors associated with each sensing system in order to compute an exact solution, a set of solutions are obtained along with a prescribed risk index. The risk associated with each set of actions can then be compared to possible payoffs or rewards, for instance task completion time or power consumption. This information is then sent to a high level decision planner, for instance a human teleoperator, who can then make a more informed decision regarding the robots actions. In order to illustrate the concept, we introduce three specific risk measures, namely, the collision risk and the risk of toppling and failure risk associated with grasping an object. We demonstrate the results from this foundational study of risk-aware compositional robot autonomy in simulation using NASA's Valkyrie humanoid robot, and the grasping simulator HAPTIX.

Robotics
Human Reactions to Incorrect Answers from Robots

Ponkoj Chandra Shill,Md. Azizul Hakim,Muhammad Jahanzeb Khan,Bashira Akter Anima

2024-03-21

Abstract:As robots grow more and more integrated into numerous industries, it is critical to comprehend how humans respond to their failures. This paper systematically studies how trust dynamics and system design are affected by human responses to robot failures. The three-stage survey used in the study provides a thorough understanding of human-robot interactions. While the second stage concentrates on interaction details, such as robot precision and error acknowledgment, the first stage collects demographic data and initial levels of trust. In the last phase, participants' perceptions are examined after the encounter, and trust dynamics, forgiveness, and propensity to suggest robotic technologies are evaluated. Results show that participants' trust in robotic technologies increased significantly when robots acknowledged their errors or limitations to participants and their willingness to suggest robots for activities in the future points to a favorable change in perception, emphasizing the role that direct engagement has in influencing trust dynamics. By providing useful advice for creating more sympathetic, responsive, and reliable robotic systems, the study advances the science of human-robot interaction and promotes a wider adoption of robotic technologies.

Robotics
Robots in the Danger Zone: Exploring Public Perception through Engagement

David A. Robb,Muneeb I. Ahmad,Carlo Tiseo,Simona Aracri,Alistair C. McConnell,Vincent Page,Christian Dondrup,Francisco J. Chiyah Garcia,Hai-Nguyen Nguyen,Èric Pairet,Paola Ardón Ramírez,Tushar Semwal,Hazel M. Taylor,Lindsay J. Wilson,David Lane,Helen Hastie,Katrin Lohan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374789

2020-04-02

Abstract:Public perceptions of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (RAI) are important in the acceptance, uptake, government regulation and research funding of this technology. Recent research has shown that the public's understanding of RAI can be negative or inaccurate. We believe effective public engagement can help ensure that public opinion is better informed. In this paper, we describe our first iteration of a high throughput in-person public engagement activity. We describe the use of a light touch quiz-format survey instrument to integrate in-the-wild research participation into the engagement, allowing us to probe both the effectiveness of our engagement strategy, and public perceptions of the future roles of robots and humans working in dangerous settings, such as in the off-shore energy sector. We critique our methods and share interesting results into generational differences within the public's view of the future of Robotics and AI in hazardous environments. These findings include that older peoples' views about the future of robots in hazardous environments were not swayed by exposure to our exhibit, while the views of younger people were affected by our exhibit, leading us to consider carefully in future how to more effectively engage with and inform older people.

Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction,Robotics
Humanoid Robots at work: where are we ?

Fabrice R. Noreils

2024-04-06

Abstract:Launched by Elon Musk and its Optimus, we are witnessing a new race in which many companies have already engaged. The objective it to put at work a new generation of humanoid robots in demanding industrial environments within 2 or 3 years. Is this objective realistic ? The aim of this document and its main contributions is to provide some hints by covering the following topics: First an analysis of 12 companies based on eight criteria that will help us to distinguish companies based on their maturity and approach to the market; second as these humanoids are very complex systems we will provide an overview of the technological challenges to be addressed; third when humanoids are deployed at scale, Operation and Maintenance become critical and the we will explore what is new with these complex machines; Finally Pilots are the last step to test the feasibility of a new system before mass deployment. This is an important step to test the maturity of a product and the strategy of the humanoid supplier to address a market and two pragmatic approaches will be discussed.

Computers and Society,Human-Computer Interaction,Robotics
Will You Listen to a Robot? Effects of Robot Ability, Task Complexity, and Risk on Human Decision-Making

Hanjing Huang,Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,Liang Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2021.1974940

IF: 2.057

2021-01-01

Advanced Robotics

Abstract:With the rapid development of new technology, robots are increasingly being introduced into decision-making such that people can receive advice from them. Decision-making involves many variables, which should be investigated together. In the current study, we explored human-robot interaction in decision-making from the perspectives of confidence, trust, decision change, and reciprocity. We also investigated the effects of robot ability, task complexity, and risk on human-robot interaction in decision-making. We conducted an experiment where participants received advice from robots in a length judgment task, for which the participants had to select the longest line among eight lines. The results showed that participants had higher trust and confidence when receiving advice from high-ability robots. However, the participants had less confidence, reduced trust in the robots, a lower tendency to change their decision, and shared more losses with robots during complex tasks. They placed less trust in the robots and shared fewer benefits with them in a high-risk condition. Additionally, the participants' self-construal was significantly correlated with trust and gender was significantly correlated with confidence, benefits shared with the robot, and decision change. These findings can aid researchers and designers in the development of service robots.
Hallmarks of Human-Machine Collaboration: A framework for assessment in the DARPA Communicating with Computers Program

Robyn Kozierok,John Aberdeen,Cheryl Clark,Christopher Garay,Bradley Goodman,Tonia Korves,Lynette Hirschman,Patricia L. McDermott,Matthew W. Peterson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.04958

2021-02-10

Abstract:There is a growing desire to create computer systems that can communicate effectively to collaborate with humans on complex, open-ended activities. Assessing these systems presents significant challenges. We describe a framework for evaluating systems engaged in open-ended complex scenarios where evaluators do not have the luxury of comparing performance to a single right answer. This framework has been used to evaluate human-machine creative collaborations across story and music generation, interactive block building, and exploration of molecular mechanisms in cancer. These activities are fundamentally different from the more constrained tasks performed by most contemporary personal assistants as they are generally open-ended, with no single correct solution, and often no obvious completion criteria. We identified the Key Properties that must be exhibited by successful systems. From there we identified "Hallmarks" of success -- capabilities and features that evaluators can observe that would be indicative of progress toward achieving a Key Property. In addition to being a framework for assessment, the Key Properties and Hallmarks are intended to serve as goals in guiding research direction.

Human-Computer Interaction,Artificial Intelligence,Computation and Language,Multiagent Systems,Multimedia
Robots: the Century Past and the Century Ahead

Federico Pigozzi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.13331

IF: 3.7

2022-04-28

Robotics

Abstract:Let us reflect on the state of robotics. This year marks the $101$-st anniversary of R.U.R., a play by the writer Karel \v{C}apek, often credited with introducing the word "robot". The word used to refer to feudal forced labourers in Slavic languages. Indeed, it points to one key characteristic of robotic systems: they are mere slaves, have no rights, and execute our wills instruction by instruction, without asking anything in return. The relationship with us humans is commensalism; in biology, commensalism subsists between two symbiotic species when one species benefits from it (robots boost productivity for humans), while the other species neither benefits nor is harmed (can you really argue that robots benefit from simply functioning?). We then distinguish robots from "living machines", that is, machines infused with life. If living machines should ever become a reality, we would need to shift our relationship with them from commensalism to mutualism. The distinction is not subtle: we experience it every day with domesticated animals, that exchange serfdom for forage and protection. This is because life has evolved to resist any attempt at enslaving it; it is stubborn. In the path towards living machines, let us ask: what has been achieved by robotics in the last $100$ years? What is left to accomplish in the next $100$ years? For us, the answers boil down to three words: juice, need (or death), and embodiment, as we shall see in the following.
Deploying Robots in Everyday Environments: Towards Dependable and Practical Robotic Systems

Alex Mitrevski,Santosh Thoduka,Argentina Ortega Sáinz,Maximilian Schöbel,Patrick Nagel,Paul G. Plöger,Erwin Prassler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.12719

2022-06-26

Abstract:Robot deployment in realistic dynamic environments is a challenging problem despite the fact that robots can be quite skilled at a large number of isolated tasks. One reason for this is that robots are rarely equipped with powerful introspection capabilities, which means that they cannot always deal with failures in a reasonable manner; in addition, manual diagnosis is often a tedious task that requires technicians to have a considerable set of robotics skills. In this paper, we discuss our ongoing efforts - in the context of the ROPOD project - to address some of these problems. In particular, we (i) present our early efforts at developing a robotic black box and consider some factors that complicate its design, (ii) explain our component and system monitoring concept, and (iii) describe the necessity for remote monitoring and experimentation as well as our initial attempts at performing those. Our preliminary work opens a range of promising directions for making robots more usable and reliable in practice - not only in the context of ROPOD, but in a more general sense as well.

Robotics
The Effect of Robot Skill Level and Communication in Rapid, Proximate Human-Robot Collaboration

Kin Man Lee,Arjun Krishna,Zulfiqar Zaidi,Rohan Paleja,Letian Chen,Erin Hedlund-Botti,Mariah Schrum,Matthew Gombolay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3568162.3577002

2023-04-08

Abstract:As high-speed, agile robots become more commonplace, these robots will have the potential to better aid and collaborate with humans. However, due to the increased agility and functionality of these robots, close collaboration with humans can create safety concerns that alter team dynamics and degrade task performance. In this work, we aim to enable the deployment of safe and trustworthy agile robots that operate in proximity with humans. We do so by 1) Proposing a novel human-robot doubles table tennis scenario to serve as a testbed for studying agile, proximate human-robot collaboration and 2) Conducting a user-study to understand how attributes of the robot (e.g., robot competency or capacity to communicate) impact team dynamics, perceived safety, and perceived trust, and how these latent factors affect human-robot collaboration (HRC) performance. We find that robot competency significantly increases perceived trust ($p<.001$), extending skill-to-trust assessments in prior studies to agile, proximate HRC. Furthermore, interestingly, we find that when the robot vocalizes its intention to perform a task, it results in a significant decrease in team performance ($p=.037$) and perceived safety of the system ($p=.009$).

Robotics
"Hit the Robot on the Head With This Mallet" - Making a Case for Including More Open Questions in HRI Research

Katie A Riddoch,Emily S Cross

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.603510

2021-02-25

Abstract:Researchers continue to devise creative ways to explore the extent to which people perceive robots as social agents, as opposed to objects. One such approach involves asking participants to inflict 'harm' on a robot. Researchers are interested in the length of time between the experimenter issuing the instruction and the participant complying, and propose that relatively long periods of hesitation might reflect empathy for the robot, and perhaps even attribution of human-like qualities, such as agency and sentience. In a recent experiment, we adapted the so-called 'hesitance to hit' paradigm, in which participants were instructed to hit a humanoid robot on the head with a mallet. After standing up to do so (signaling intent to hit the robot), participants were stopped, and then took part in a semi-structured interview to probe their thoughts and feelings during the period of hesitation. Thematic analysis of the responses indicate that hesitation not only reflects perceived socialness, but also other factors including (but not limited to) concerns about cost, mallet disbelief, processing of the task instruction, and the influence of authority. The open-ended, free responses participants provided also offer rich insights into individual differences with regards to anthropomorphism, perceived power imbalances, and feelings of connection toward the robot. In addition to aiding understanding of this measurement technique and related topics regarding socialness attribution to robots, we argue that greater use of open questions can lead to exciting new research questions and interdisciplinary collaborations in the domain of social robotics.
Human-Robot Teaming: Grand Challenges

Manisha Natarajan,Esmaeil Seraj,Batuhan Altundas,Rohan Paleja,Sean Ye,Letian Chen,Reed Jensen,Kimberlee Chestnut Chang,Matthew Gombolay,Seraj, Esmaeil,Altundas, Batuhan,Paleja, Rohan,Ye, Sean,Chen, Letian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-023-00103-1

2023-08-09

Current Robotics Reports

Abstract:Current real-world interaction between humans and robots is extremely limited. We present challenges that, if addressed, will enable humans and robots to collaborate fluently.
Trust in the Danger Zone: Individual Differences in Confidence in Robot Threat Assessments

Jinchao Lin,April Rose Panganiban,Gerald Matthews,Katey Gibbins,Emily Ankeney,Carlie See,Rachel Bailey,Michael Long

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.601523

2022-03-31

Abstract:Effective human-robot teaming (HRT) increasingly requires humans to work with intelligent, autonomous machines. However, novel features of intelligent autonomous systems such as social agency and incomprehensibility may influence the human's trust in the machine. The human operator's mental model for machine functioning is critical for trust. People may consider an intelligent machine partner as either an advanced tool or as a human-like teammate. This article reports a study that explored the role of individual differences in the mental model in a simulated environment. Multiple dispositional factors that may influence the dominant mental model were assessed. These included the Robot Threat Assessment (RoTA), which measures the person's propensity to apply tool and teammate models in security contexts. Participants (N = 118) were paired with an intelligent robot tasked with making threat assessments in an urban setting. A transparency manipulation was used to influence the dominant mental model. For half of the participants, threat assessment was described as physics-based (e.g., weapons sensed by sensors); the remainder received transparency information that described psychological cues (e.g., facial expression). We expected that the physics-based transparency messages would guide the participant toward treating the robot as an advanced machine (advanced tool mental model activation), while psychological messaging would encourage perceptions of the robot as acting like a human partner (teammate mental model). We also manipulated situational danger cues present in the simulated environment. Participants rated their trust in the robot's decision as well as threat and anxiety, for each of 24 urban scenes. They also completed the RoTA and additional individual-difference measures. Findings showed that trust assessments reflected the degree of congruence between the robot's decision and situational danger cues, consistent with participants acting as Bayesian decision makers. Several scales, including the RoTA, were more predictive of trust when the robot was making psychology-based decisions, implying that trust reflected individual differences in the mental model of the robot as a teammate. These findings suggest scope for designing training that uncovers and mitigates the individual's biases toward intelligent machines.
Future of human-robot interaction in space

Stephanie Sze Ting Pau,Judith-Irina Buchheim,Daniel Freer,Guang-Zhong Yang

2021-01-01

Abstract:Chapter Contents: 10.1 The challenge of human—robot interaction in space 10.1.1 Humans, the complexity of space operations 10.1.2 Space robots, a technological challenge 10.1.3 Interaction, theory and practice 10.2 Future of interaction with autonomous robotics in space 10.2.1 Motivations for shared autonomy 10.2.2 Capabilities for the future of interaction 10.2.2.1 Research on signifiers from human agent — sensors and neuro-ergonomics 10.2.2.2 Research on natural mapping and feedback mechanisms — embodied interaction/humanoids 10.2.2.3 Research to support human capabilities — crew autonomy 10.2.2.5 Research to simulate operation realism and pressure — working with time delay 10.3 Case study: a future crew assistant 10.3.1 CIMON® — the intelligent astronaut assistant 10.3.1.1 Hypothesis 10.3.1.2 Implementation as fast track experiment for the horizons mission 10.3.1.3 Functionalities of CIMON® on board 10.3.2 The case for crew assistance robot — for space and earth 10.4 Recommendations and trends 10.5 References
Rise of the HaCRS: Augmenting Autonomous Cyber Reasoning Systems with Human Assistance

Yan Shoshitaishvili,Michael Weissbacher,Lukas Dresel,Christopher Salls,Ruoyu Wang,Christopher Kruegel,Giovanni Vigna

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.02749

2017-08-09

Abstract:As the size and complexity of software systems increase, the number and sophistication of software security flaws increase as well. The analysis of these flaws began as a manual approach, but it soon became apparent that tools were necessary to assist human experts in this task, resulting in a number of techniques and approaches that automated aspects of the vulnerability analysis process. Recently, DARPA carried out the Cyber Grand Challenge, a competition among autonomous vulnerability analysis systems designed to push the tool-assisted human-centered paradigm into the territory of complete automation. However, when the autonomous systems were pitted against human experts it became clear that certain tasks, albeit simple, could not be carried out by an autonomous system, as they require an understanding of the logic of the application under analysis. Based on this observation, we propose a shift in the vulnerability analysis paradigm, from tool-assisted human-centered to human-assisted tool-centered. In this paradigm, the automated system orchestrates the vulnerability analysis process, and leverages humans (with different levels of expertise) to perform well-defined sub-tasks, whose results are integrated in the analysis. As a result, it is possible to scale the analysis to a larger number of programs, and, at the same time, optimize the use of expensive human resources. In this paper, we detail our design for a human-assisted automated vulnerability analysis system, describe its implementation atop an open-sourced autonomous vulnerability analysis system that participated in the Cyber Grand Challenge, and evaluate and discuss the significant improvements that non-expert human assistance can offer to automated analysis approaches.

Cryptography and Security,Human-Computer Interaction
Can A Single Human Supervise A Swarm of 100 Heterogeneous Robots?

Julie A. Adams,Joshua Hamell,Phillip Walker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55417/fr.2023026

2023-08-01

Abstract:An open research question has been whether a single human can supervise a true heterogeneous swarm of robots completing tasks in real world environments. A general concern is whether or not the human's workload will be taxed to the breaking point. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's OFFsensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics program's field exercises that occurred at U.S. Army urban training sites provided the opportunity to understand the impact of achieving such swarm deployments. The Command and Control of Aggregate Swarm Tactics integrator team's swarm commander users the heterogeneous robot swarm to conduct relevant missions. During the final OFFSET program field exercise, the team collected objective and subjective metrics related to teh swarm commander's human performance. A multi-dimensional workload algorithm that estimates overall workload based on five components of workload was used to analyze the results. While the swarm commander's workload estimate did cross the overload threshold frequently, the swarm commander was able to successfully complete the missions, often under challenging operational conditions. The presented results demonstrate that a single human can deploy a swarm of 100 heterogeneous robots to conduct real-world missions.

Robotics,Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction

Would you risk humanity's survival on a robot built in two years?

Autonomous Military Robotics: Risk, Ethics, and Design

Swift Trust in Mobile Ad Hoc Human-Robot Teams

Replacing Human Beings by Robots. How to Tackle that Perspective by Technology Assessment

An Engineer's Nightmare: 102 Years of Critical Robotics

Robotic lab techs

Integrating Risk in Humanoid Robot Control for Applications in the Nuclear Industry

Human Reactions to Incorrect Answers from Robots

Robots in the Danger Zone: Exploring Public Perception through Engagement

Humanoid Robots at work: where are we ?

Will You Listen to a Robot? Effects of Robot Ability, Task Complexity, and Risk on Human Decision-Making

Hallmarks of Human-Machine Collaboration: A framework for assessment in the DARPA Communicating with Computers Program

Robots: the Century Past and the Century Ahead

Deploying Robots in Everyday Environments: Towards Dependable and Practical Robotic Systems

The Effect of Robot Skill Level and Communication in Rapid, Proximate Human-Robot Collaboration

"Hit the Robot on the Head With This Mallet" - Making a Case for Including More Open Questions in HRI Research

Human-Robot Teaming: Grand Challenges

Trust in the Danger Zone: Individual Differences in Confidence in Robot Threat Assessments

Future of human-robot interaction in space

Rise of the HaCRS: Augmenting Autonomous Cyber Reasoning Systems with Human Assistance

Can A Single Human Supervise A Swarm of 100 Heterogeneous Robots?