Abstract:The discussion in chapter 2 addressed what might be described as a microview of the US energy economy— how we use energy as individuals, how we measure our personal consumption, and how we pay for it. We turn attention now to a more expansive perspective— the use of energy on a national scale, including a discussion of associated economic benefits and costs. We focus specifically on implications for emissions of the greenhouse gas CO2. If we are to take the issue of human- induced climate change seriously— and I do— we will be obliged to adjust our energy system markedly to reduce emissions of this gas, the most important agent for human- induced climate change. And we will need to do it sooner rather than later. This chapter will underscore the magnitude of the challenge we face if we are to successfully chart the course to a more sustainable climate- energy future. We turn later to strategies that might accelerate our progress toward this objective.We elected in this volume to focus on the present and potential future of the energy economy of the United States. It is important to recognize that the fate of the global climate system will depend not just on what happens in the United States but also to an increasing extent on what comes to pass in other large industrial economies. China surpassed the United States as the largest national emitter of CO2 in 2006. The United States and China together were responsible in 2012 for more than 42% of total global emissions. Add Russia, India, Japan, Germany, Canada, United Kingdom, South Korea, and Iran to the mix (the other members of the top 10 emitting countries ordered in terms of their relative contributions), and we can account for more than 60% of the global total. Given the importance of China to the global CO2 economy (more than 26% of the present global total and likely to increase significantly in the near term), I decided that it would be instructive to include here at least some discussion of the situation in China— to elaborate what the energy economies of China and the United States have in common, outlining at the same time the factors and challenges that set them apart.

Shared vision for a decarbonized future energy system in the United States

Public Preferences in a Shifting Energy Future: Comparing Public Views of Eight Energy Sources in North America’s Pacific Northwest

Americans' Views of Fusion Energy: Implications for Sustainable Public Support

A Perspective of Decarbonization Pathways in Future Buildings in the United States

Vision for a Low- Carbon- Energy Future

Exploring equality and sustainability trade-offs of energy transition outcomes in the United States in 2050

A Study of American Response to Climate Change and the Influence of Carbon Dependency, Social Capital, and Political Orientation

Climate policy uncertainty and renewable energy consumption at crossroads: designing SDG policies for the United States

Do climate concerns and worries predict energy preferences? A meta-analysis

Diverse decarbonization pathways under near cost-optimal futures

Change in US state-level public opinion about climate change: 2008-2020

A Zero-Carbon Nuclear Energy Future? Lessons Learned from Perceptions of Climate Change and Nuclear Waste

Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Structural Influences*

Factors Shaping Public Support for More Carbon Capture and Storage Projects in the United States

Decarbonization pathways for the residential sector in the United States

Dynamic role of climate change, energy innovation and renewable energy on energy transition in USA: Fresh insights from green finance development

Imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: Valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon future

Air pollution disparities and equality assessments of US national decarbonization strategies

Supply, demand and polarization challenges facing US climate policies

The Contemporary US Energy System Overview Including A Comparison With China

A US perspective on closing the carbon cycle to defossilize difficult-to-electrify segments of our economy