Abstract:Background: Cluster randomised controlled trials (cRCT) present challenges regarding risks of bias and chance imbalances by arm. This paper reports strategies to minimise and monitor biases and imbalances in the ChEETAh cRCT. Methods: ChEETAh was an international cRCT (hospitals as clusters) evaluating whether changing sterile gloves and instruments prior to abdominal wound closure reduces surgical site infection at 30 days postoperative. ChEETAh planned to recruit 12,800 consecutive patients from 64 hospitals in seven low-middle income countries. Eight strategies to minimise and monitor bias were pre-specified: (1) minimum of 4 hospitals per country; (2) pre-randomisation identification of units of exposure (operating theatres, lists, teams or sessions) within clusters; (3) minimisation of randomisation by country and hospital type; (4) site training delivered after randomisation; (5) dedicated 'warm-up week' to train teams; (6) trial specific sticker and patient register to monitor consecutive patient identification; (7) monitoring characteristics of patients and units of exposure; and (8) low-burden outcome-assessment. Results: This analysis includes 10,686 patients from 70 clusters. The results aligned to the eight strategies were (1) 6 out of 7 countries included ≥ 4 hospitals; (2) 87.1% (61/70) of hospitals maintained their planned operating theatres (82% [27/33] and 92% [34/37] in the intervention and control arms); (3) minimisation maintained balance of key factors in both arms; (4) post-randomisation training was conducted for all hospitals; (5) the 'warm-up week' was conducted at all sites, and feedback used to refine processes; (6) the sticker and trial register were maintained, with an overall inclusion of 98.1% (10,686/10,894) of eligible patients; (7) monitoring allowed swift identification of problems in patient inclusion and key patient characteristics were reported: malignancy (20.3% intervention vs 12.6% control), midline incisions (68.4% vs 58.9%) and elective surgery (52.4% vs 42.6%); and (8) 0.4% (41/9187) of patients refused consent for outcome assessment. Conclusion: cRCTs in surgery have several potential sources of bias that include varying units of exposure and the need for consecutive inclusion of all eligible patients across complex settings. We report a system that monitored and minimised the risks of bias and imbalances by arm, with important lessons for future cRCTs within hospitals.

Barriers and enablers to conducting cluster randomized control trials in hospitals: A theory-informed scoping review

Systematic scoping review of cluster randomised trials conducted exclusively in low-income and middle-income countries between 2017 and 2022

Qualitative study of challenges with recruitment of hospitals into a cluster controlled trial of clinical decision support in Australia

Effective interventions to increase representation of under-served groups in randomised trials in UK and Ireland: a scoping literature review

When is a randomised controlled trial health equity relevant? Development and validation of a conceptual framework

Methods for dealing with unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials: A scoping review

Strategies to minimise and monitor biases and imbalances by arm in surgical cluster randomised trials: evidence from ChEETAh, a trial in seven low- and middle-income countries

Research integrity in randomized clinical trials: A scoping umbrella review

The application of stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial study designs in oncology settings: A systematic review

Operational complexities in international clinical trials: a systematic review of challenges and proposed solutions

Barriers and facilitators to designing, maintaining, and utilizing rare disease patient registries: a scoping review protocol

Registry-based randomised controlled trials: conduct, advantages and challenges—a systematic review

The Main Gaps for Randomized-controlled Trials in Psychiatry: A Bibliometric Study

Post‐publication research integrity concerns in randomized clinical trials: A scoping review of the literature

Researchers’ experiences of the design and conduct challenges associated with parallel-group cluster-randomised trials and views on a novel open-cohort design

Evaluating the current breadth of randomized control trials on cardiac arrest: A scoping review

Extending Inferences from Randomized Clinical Trials to Target Populations: A Scoping Review of Transportability Methods

Challenges and opportunities for conducting pre-hospital trauma trials: a behavioural investigation

A Scoping Review of the Barriers and Facilitators to Clinician Engagement in Hospital-Based Palliative Care in Australian Hospitals

Randomised trials conducted using cohorts: a scoping review

Barriers to research findings utilization amongst critical care nurses and allied health professionals: An international survey