Abstract:BackgroundWhether extended lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer leads to increased perioperative complications or improves survival is still controversial. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of complete mesocolic excision (CME) versus D2 dissection in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for patients with right colon cancer. This article reports the early safety results from the trial.MethodsThis randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority, trial was done at 17 hospitals in nine provinces of China. Eligible patients were aged 18–75 years with histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma located between the caecum and the right third of the transverse colon, without evidence of distant metastases. Central randomisation was done by means of the Clinical Information Management-Central Randomisation System via block randomisation (block size of four). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to CME or D2 dissection during laparoscopic right colectomy. Central lymph nodes were dissected in the CME but not in the D2 procedure. Neither investigators nor patients were masked to their group assignment but the quality control committee were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival, but the data for this endpoint are not yet mature; thus, only the secondary outcomes—intraoperative surgical complications and postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery, graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, mortality (death from any cause within 30 days of surgery), and central lymph node metastasis rate in the CME group only—are reported in this Article. This early analysis of safety was preplanned. The outcomes were analysed according to a modified intention-to-treat principle (excluding patients who no longer met inclusion criteria after surgery or who did not have surgery). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02619942. Study recruitment is complete, and follow-up is ongoing.FindingsBetween Jan 11, 2016, and Dec 26, 2019, 1072 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. After exclusion of 77 patients, 995 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (495 in the CME group and 500 in the D2 dissection group). The postoperative surgical complication rate was 20% (97 of 495 patients) in the CME group versus 22% (109 of 500 patients) in the D2 group (difference, −2·2% [95% CI −7·2 to 2·8]; p=0·39); the frequency of Clavien-Dindo grade I–II complications were similar between groups (91 [18%] vs 92 [18%], difference, −0·0% [95% CI −4·8 to 4·8]; p=1·0) but Clavien-Dindo grade III−IV complications were significantly less frequent in the CME group than in the D2 group (six [1%] vs 17 [3%], −2·2% [−4·1 to −0·3]; p=0·022); no deaths occurred in either group. Of the intraoperative complications, vascular injury was significantly more common in the CME group than in the D2 group (15 [3%] vs six [1%], difference, 1·8 [95% CI 0·04 to 3·6]; p=0·045). Metastases in the central lymph nodes were detected in 13 (3%) of 394 patients who underwent central lymph node biopsy in the CME group; no patient had isolated metastases to central lymph nodes.InterpretationAlthough the CME procedure might increase the risk of intraoperative vascular injury, it generally seems to be safe and feasible for experienced surgeons.FundingThe Capital Characteristic Clinical Project of Beijing and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

Three-field versus two-field lymphadenectomy in transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: short-term outcomes of a randomized clinical trial

Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymphadenectomy Plus Complete Mesogastric Excision (D2+CME) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Short-Term Analysis of a Single Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Esophagectomy With Three-Field Versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial

RA02.01: COMPARISON OF THREE-FIELD VERSUS TWO-FIELD LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR THORACIC MIDDLE AND LOWER ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: POST-OPERATIVE RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Three-field Versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Carcinoma of the Middle and Lower Esophagus: Short-term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Three-Field Versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: 3-Year Survival Outcomes of a Randomized Trial

[Efficacy Comparison Between Two-Field and Three-Field Lymphadenectomy for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma].

Three-Field or Two-Field Resection for Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Three-field Versus Two-Field Lymph Node Dissection for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Propensity Score-Matched Comparison.

AB001. Open Three-Stage Transthoracic Oesophagectomy Versus Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: a Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial

Two-Field Lymph Node Dissection with Adjuvant Radiation Therapy is Similar to 3-Field Lymph Node Dissection for Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Short-term Outcomes of Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus D2 Dissection in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colectomy for Right Colon Cancer (RELARC): a Randomised, Controlled, Phase 3, Superiority Trial

Comparison of 2-field lymphadenectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy for middle third thoracic esophageal carcinomas

555. SUPRACLAVICULAR NODE INVOLVEMENT, A NODAL OR METASTATIC DISEASE? - A 10-YEAR EXPERIENCE IN ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA AT A TERTIARY REFERRAL CENTRE

Open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy versus minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: protocol for a multicentre prospective, open and parallel, randomised controlled trial.

Short-Term Outcomes of Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus D2 Dissection in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colectomy for Right Colon Cancer (RELARC Trial): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Phase III Trial

A Clinical study on the value of postoperative radiotherapy after three-field lymphadenectomy in N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Extended Right Thoracic Approach Compared with Limited Left Thoracic Approach for Patients with Middle and Lower Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Three-year Survival of a Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Trial

Investigation To Metastasis Of Regional Lymph Node Station And Prediction To Long-Term Survival Following Esophagectomy In Thoracic Esophageal Cancer With Stage T1 To T3.

Comparing survival between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by open or thoracoscopic oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

[A Multi-Centered Randomized Controlled Study of Neo-Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Esophagus: an Interim Analysis].