Testing Twin Deficits Hypothesis Using VARs and Variance Decomposition
Ahmad Zubaidi Baharumshah,Evan Lau,Ahmed M. Khalid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860600764245
2006-01-01
Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy
Abstract:ABSTRACT ABSTRACT This paper examines the twin deficits hypothesis in the ASEAN countries. The major findings of this paper are the following. (1) Long run relationships are detected between budget and current account deficits. (2) The Keynesian view fits well for Thailand since the causality runs from budget deficit to current account deficit. For Indonesia, the causality runs in an opposite direction while the empirical results indicate that a bidirectional pattern of causality exists for Malaysia and the Philippines. (3) We also found support for an indirect causal relationship that runs from budget deficit to higher interest rates, and higher interest rates leading to the appreciation of the exchange rate, which in turn leads with the widening of the current account deficit. The results of the variance decompositions and impulse response functions suggest that the consequences of large budget and current account deficits become noticeable only over the long run. KEY WORDS: Twin deficitscointegrationvariance decompositionJEL CLASSIFICATIONS: F30H60 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees and the Editor of this journal, Anis Choudhry for helpful comments and suggestions which have substantially improved the quality of the present version. Financial support from the MOSTI [Grant no: 05-02-04-0532-EA001] is gratefully acknowledged. The usual disclaimer applies to all remaining errors and omissions. Notes 1. In the period 1980–85, the budget deficit in the US rose from US$74 billion in 1980 to a total of US$212 billion in 1985. In the same period, the dollar appreciated and in turn led to a deterioration in current account balance from a surplus of US$6.0 billion in 1980 to a deficit of US$124 billion by the year 1985. It is widely believed that the US current account deficit rose mainly because of skyrocketing budget deficits. The dramatic increase in the budget and current account deficits is commonly referred to as the 'twin deficits'. 2. Milesi-Ferretti & Razin (1996) Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. and Razin, A. 1996. Current account sustainability: selected East Asian and Latin American experiences, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 5791 [Google Scholar] and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (1997) Monetary Authority of Singapore. 1997. Current account deficits in the ASEAN-3, is there cause for concern? Occasional paper No. 1 [Google Scholar] pointed out that the presence of a budget deficit is also an explanation for the current account deficits in most of the ASEAN countries. Therefore, the choice of the countries in this study is not without merit. 3. The importance of the mediating variables in the twin deficits nexus is emphasized in Abell (1990) Abell, J. 1990. Twin deficits during the 1980s: an empirical investigation. Journal of Macroeconomics, 12: 81–96. [CSA][Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] and Anoruo & Ramchander (1998) Anoruo, E. and Ramchander, S. 1998. Current account and fiscal deficits: evidence from five developing economies of Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 9: 487–501. [CROSSREF][CSA][Crossref] , [Google Scholar]. The role of the dollar in causing the trade deficit is a key part of the widely accepted doctrine that links trade deficit to the US budget deficit. 4. As pointed by the referee, S = I may not be true for most of the sample countries. 5. Some earlier works that attempted to resolve the issue include Hutchison & Pigott (1984) Hutchison, M. M. and Pigott, C. 1984. Budget deficits, exchange rates and current account: theory and U.S. evidence. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review, 4: 5–25. [CSA] [Google Scholar] and Bachman (1992) Bachman, D. D. 1992. Why is the US current account deficit so large? Evidence from vector autoregressions. Southern Economic Journal, 59: 232–240. [CROSSREF][CSA][Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]. These studies also identified a causal relationship running from budget to current account deficits 6. The term Ricardian Equivalent first introduced by Buchanan (1976) Buchanan, J. M. 1976. Barro on the Ricardian equivalence theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 84: 337–342. [CROSSREF][CSA][Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] implies that budget deficit could not cause current account deficit (see Barro, 1989 Barro, R. J. 1989. The Ricardian approach to budget deficits. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3: 37–54. [CSA][Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). For details on REH, see Seater (1993) Seater, J. J. 1993. Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Economic Literature, 31: 142–190. [CSA][Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] and the reference therein. 7. For instance, in the 1980s much of the Latin American countries' domestic investments were growing more rapidly than the domestic savings. This had an adverse effect on current account. The budget (fiscal) position had exacerbated the private sector imbalances. 8. An anonymous referee raised the issue of the potential price effect on the economy following an expansionary fiscal policy. The analysis should also include a price variable in the VAR model; however, doing so would affect the degree of freedom, given the sample period. We hope that the omission will not greatly influence the results. 9. According to IMF, Indonesia and Thailand transformed their officially declared exchange rate regimes in the direction of a greater flexibility system as a result of the crisis. Only the Philippines retained the pre-crisis independent float system. See also Hernández & Montiel (2003) Hernandez, L. and Montiel, P. J. 2003. Post-crisis exchange rates policies in five Asian countries: filling in the 'hollow middle'?. Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 17: 336–369. [CROSSREF][CSA][Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] for details. Preliminary results based on data ended 2000:4 did not yield satisfactory results and in the subsequent analysis, we have excluded the post-September 1998 period. 10. The short-run nominal interest rates used are as follows: Malaysia and the Philippines – 3-month treasury bill rates, Indonesia – interbank call loan rate while discount rates were used for Thailand. 11. We would like to express our gratitude to an anonymous referee for providing us this insight. 12. Most of the computations were done with EVIEWS MICROFIT and PcGIVE. The multivariate generalization of AIC yielded VAR (5) for the Philippines and Thailand, VAR (3) for Malaysia and VAR (4) for Indonesia. Despite different lag structures in each country, the residuals did not exhibit any form of serial correlation or ARCH effects satisfying the normal specification criteria for the residuals. In addition, the multivariate generalization of AIC remains the best performing criterion as the system dimension increases (see Gonzalo & Pitarakis, 2002 Gonzalo, J. and Pitarakis, J. Y. 2002. Lag length estimation in large dimensional systems. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 23: 401–423. [CROSSREF][CSA][Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). 13. Model 1 = standard cointegration, Model 2 = level shift (C), Model 3 = level shift with trend (C/T) and Model 4 = regime shift (C/S). We followed Gregory & Hansen (1996) Gregory, A. W. and Hansen, B. E. 1996. Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70: 99–126. [CROSSREF][CSA][Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] to compute the ADF statistics for each breakpoint in the interval, 0.15T to 0.85T (where T is the number of observations). We chose the breakpoint associated with the smallest negative value where the structural break occurred. 14. They have proven that in the integrated and (non-) cointegrated system, the MWALD test for restrictions on the parameters of a VAR (k) has an asymptotic χ2 distribution when a VAR (k + d max) is estimated, where d max is the maximum order of integration suspected to occur in the system. 15. Khalid & Teo (1999) Khalid, A. M. and Teo, W. G. 1999. Causality tests of budget and current account deficits: cross-country comparisons. Empirical Economics, 24: 389–402. [CROSSREF][CSA][Crossref] , [Google Scholar] argued that a high correspondence between the two deficits is more likely to emerge in developing countries due to the differences in the structure of the economy. As such, the macroeconomic dynamics governing the two deficits may be different from the developed economy.