Abstract:This in‐depth study considers the contribution of immigration to population growth, when immigration is estimated indirectly in an integrated population model. The authors demonstrate the importance of simulation and sensitivity analysis for obtaining robust conclusions, and introduce an elegant prior to the problem along the way. Identifying important demographic drivers of population dynamics is fundamental for understanding life‐history evolution and implementing effective conservation measures. Integrated population models (IPMs) coupled with transient life table response experiments (tLTREs) allow ecologists to quantify the contributions of demographic parameters to observed population change. While IPMs can estimate parameters that are not estimable using any data source alone, for example, immigration, the estimated contribution of such parameters to population change is prone to bias. Currently, it is unclear when robust conclusions can be drawn from them. We sought to understand the drivers of a rebounding southern elephant seal population on Marion Island using the IPM–tLTRE framework, applied to count and mark–recapture data on 9500 female seals over nearly 40 years. Given the uncertainty around IPM–tLTRE estimates of immigration, we also aimed to investigate the utility of simulation and sensitivity analyses as general tools for evaluating the robustness of conclusions obtained in this framework. Using a Bayesian IPM and tLTRE analysis, we quantified the contributions of survival, immigration and population structure to population growth. We assessed the sensitivity of our estimates to choice of multivariate priors on immigration and other vital rates. To do so we make a novel application of Gaussian process priors, in comparison with commonly used shrinkage priors. Using simulation, we assessed our model's ability to estimate the demographic contribution of immigration under different levels of temporal variance in immigration. The tLTRE analysis suggested that adult survival and immigration were the most important drivers of recent population growth. While the contribution of immigration was sensitive to prior choices, the estimate was consistently large. Furthermore, our simulation study validated the importance of immigration by showing that our estimate of its demographic contribution is unlikely to result as a biased overestimate. Our results highlight the connectivity between distant populations of southern elephant seals, illustrating that female dispersal can be important in regulating the abundance of local populations even when natal site fidelity is high. More generally, we demonstrate how robust ecological conclusions may be obtained about immigration from the IPM–tLTRE framework, by combining sensitivity analysis and simulation.

Rejoinder to the discussion on “The central role of the identifying assumption in population size estimation”

Discussion on “The central role of the identifying assumption in population size estimation” by Serge Aleshin-Guendel, Mauricio Sadinle, and Jon Wakefield

Conflating marginal and conditional treatment effects: Comments on 'Assessing the performance of population adjustment methods for anchored indirect comparisons: A simulation study'

Estimating abundance of unmarked animal populations: accounting for imperfect detection and other sources of zero inflation

Null expectations and null hypothesis testing for the species abundance distribution

Population size estimation with capture-recapture in presence of individual misidentification and low recapture

The Confounding Effects of Population Structure, Genetic Diversity and the Sampling Scheme on the Detection and Quantification of Population Size Changes

Comment ignoring nonignorable effects: rejoinder

On the estimation of population size—A comparison of capture-recapture and multiplier-benchmark methods

Accounting for selection biases in population analyses: equivalence of the in-likelihood and post-processing approaches

Accurate and flexible estimation of effective population size history

One‐Inflation and Zero‐Truncation Count Data Modelling Revisited With a View on Horvitz–Thompson Estimation of Population Size

A covariate adjustment for zero-truncated approaches to estimating the size of hidden and elusive populations

Evaluating tools for capture-recapture model selection to estimate the size of hidden populations: It works in practice, but does it work in theory?

Population size estimation based upon ratios of recapture probabilities

Rejoinder: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling

The importance of independence in unmarked spatial capture–recapture analysis

On the Sample Size and the Response Rate

Robustly estimating the demographic contribution of immigration: Simulation, sensitivity analysis and seals

Modeling and Analysing Respondent Driven Sampling as a Counting Process

Integrating counts from rigorous surveys and participatory science to better understand spatiotemporal variation in population processes