Microbiomes, metabolic errors and detection of performance enhancing drug abuse1,2.

K. Timmis,J. Timmis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12498

IF: 4.006

Environmental Microbiology Reports

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Inter-cohort differences in coronary heart disease mortality in the 25-year follow-up of the seven countries study

A. Menotti,A. Keys,D. Kromhout,H. Blackburn,C. Aravanis,B. Bloemberg,R. Buzina,A. Dontas,F. Fidanza,S. Giampaoli,M. Karvonen,M. Lanti,I. Mohaček,S. Nedeljkovič,A. Nissinen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209531

1993-09-01

European Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract:
Safe Medication Use Based on Knowledge of Information about Contraindications Concerning Cross Allergy and Comprehensive Clinical Intervention

Wei Li,Ling-Ling Zhu,Quan Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s42013

2013-01-01

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management

Abstract:Background: An investigation of safety issues regarding information on contraindications related to cross allergy was conducted to promote clinical awareness and prevent medical errors in a 2200-bed tertiary care teaching hospital.Methods: Prescribing information on contraindications concerning cross allergy was collected from an information system and package inserts. Data mining and descriptive analysis were performed. A risk register was used for project management and risk assessment. A Plan, Do, Check, Act cycle was used as part of continuous quality improvement. Records of drug counseling and medical errors were collected from an online reporting system. A pharmacist-led multidisciplinary team initiated an intervention program on cross allergy in August 2008.Results: Four years of risk management at our hospital achieved successful outcomes, ie, the number of medical errors related to cross allergies decreased by 97% (10 cases monthly before August 2008 versus three cases yearly in 2012) and risk rating decreased significantly [initial risk rating: 25(high-risk) before August 2008 versus final risk rating: 6 (medium-risk) in December 2012].Conclusion: We conclude that comprehensive clinical interventions are very effective through team cooperation. Medication use has potential for safety risks if sufficient attention is not paid to contraindications concerning cross allergy. The potential for cross allergy involving drugs which belong to completely different pharmacological classes is easily overlooked and can be dangerous. Pharmacists can play an important role in reducing the risk of cross allergy as well as recommending therapeutic alternatives.
Communicating Risk in Imaging: A Scoping Review of Risk Presentation in Patient Decision Aids

Trey A Baird,Melissa Previtera,Samuel Brady,Davene R Wright,Andrew T Trout,Shireen E Hayatghaibi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.05.014

2024-10-18

Abstract:Purpose: Best practices exist for communicating medical information to patients, but there is less emphasis on methods to communicate risks, especially in medical imaging. The authors conducted a scoping review of patient decision aids in medical imaging and characterized the presentation methods of imaging risks. Methods: Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched to identify studies involving patient decision aids used in diagnostic imaging that communicated the risks. Study characteristics included the number and types of risks included, as well as the presentation type and how the probability of risks were communicated. Results: The final study included 46 articles encompassing 27 distinct patient decision aids. Mammography was the most common imaging scenario (22 of 46), followed by lung cancer screening (18 of 46), traumatic brain injury (5 of 46), and urolithiasis (1 of 46). All patient decision aids included risks associated with imaging, but the number of risk types varied from two to nine (mean, 4 ± 2). Twelve risks were identified across the 27 decision aids, but no single study included all risks. Overall, most risks (65%) were communicated with text, and the presentation mode varied by type of risk. False-positive risks were most commonly communicated using a visual format, whereas radiation risk was most commonly communicated using text format. Conclusions: There was no consistent manner of communicating risk to patients, and visual methods such as icon arrays were not consistently used. The variability of both included risks and the risk presentation modes in the patient decision aids may affect decision making, especially among patients and caregivers with lower health literacy and numeracy.
Antimicrobial prophylaxis of infective endocarditis: effect of BSAC recommendations on compliance in general practice.

C. Scully,B. Levers,M. Griffiths,P. Shirlaw

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/JAC/19.4.521

1987-04-01

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Abstract:General dental practitioners in the South West Region of the U.K. were surveyed to assess compliance with the recently published recommendations of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy on the antimicrobial prophylaxis of infective endocarditis. For the majority of dental patients, the level of prophylaxis had improved compared with previous reports: 75% of practitioners organized the prophylaxis themselves, 80% gave oral amoxycillin to penicillin non-allergic patients, and 86% gave erythromycin to penicillin-allergic patients. Some 51% complied to an acceptable level with recommended amoxycillin schedules but only 2% complied with erythromycin schedules. The BSAC recommended prophylactic regimens have certainly improved compliance although they are not yet universally accepted.
Teaching Medical Students to Communicate Risks Like Military Intelligence Analysts

James S Brooks,David Muller,Peter Campbell,Allen Yu,Brian Southwell,Maya Korin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241278182

2024-09-27

Abstract:Communication about health often involves descriptions of risk: the probability or likelihood of an unfavorable outcome. Communicating risk helps individuals make choices about their own health by building understanding of potential outcomes and providing context for the importance of procedures, health interventions, and lifestyle choices. However, medical education in the United States does not provide future physicians with adequate statistical literacy to communicate risk effectively and rarely encourages them to practice communicating risk in pre-clinical years. Risk communication in military intelligence, a field with formalized risk language and training, offers a unique perspective into potential improvements for medical risk communication. With backgrounds in the military, public health, communication, surgery, and medical education, the authors offer the following recommendations to improve risk communication for medical students. (1) Encourage the use of numerical absolute risk when communicating among health practitioners to avoid varied interpretations of what different risk descriptors ("uncommon," "likely," or "low") might mean; (2) build efficient, teachable skills in use of patient-facing risk communication tools like comparative probabilities and visual aids; and (3) practice estimating risk through role-play of risk communication between medical students and standardized patients. By improving risk communication in medical education, future doctors will be better equipped to build trust through open communication and improve the health of the patients and the communities for whom they care.
Aids to improve understanding of statistical risk in patients consenting for surgery and interventional procedures: A systematic review

Arif Hanafi Bin Jalal,Despoina Chatzopoulou,Hani J Marcus,Anand S Pandit

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12142

IF: 3.282

2024-03-21

World Journal of Surgery

Abstract:Background Informed consent is an essential process in clinical decision‐making, through which healthcare providers educate patients about benefits, risks, and alternatives of a procedure. Statistical risk information is difficult to communicate and the effectiveness of aids aimed at supporting this type of communication is uncertain. This systematic review aims to study the impact of risk communication adjuncts on patients' understanding of statistical risk in surgery and interventional procedures. Methods A systematic search was performed across Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science until July 2021 with a repeated search in September 2022. RCTs and observational studies examining risk communication tools (e.g., information leaflets and audio‐video) in adult (age >16) patients undergoing a surgical or interventional procedure were included. Primary outcomes included the objective assessment of statistical risk recall. Secondary outcomes included patient attitudes with respect to statistical information. Due to the study heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed. Results A total of 4348 articles were identified, and following abstract and full‐text screening 14 articles, including 9 RCTs, were included. The total number of adult patients was 1513. The most common risk communication tool used was written information (n = 7). Most RCTs (7/9, 77.8%) showed statistically significant improvements in patient understanding of statistical risk in the intervention group. Quality assessment found some concerns with all RCTs. Conclusion Risk communication tools appear to improve recall of statistical risk. Additional prospective trials comparing various aids simultaneously are warranted to determine the most effective method of improving understanding.

surgery
[Portocaval emergency shunt in severe esophageal varices hemorrhage].

R. Häring,U. Baer,B. Stallkamp,L. Tung

1976-05-14

Abstract:
Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Communication Tools and Presentation Formats on Patient Perceptions and Preferences

Ann Marie Navar,Tracy Y Wang,Xiaojuan Mi,Jennifer G Robinson,Salim S Virani,Veronique L Roger,Peter W F Wilson,Anne C Goldberg,Eric D Peterson,Tracy Y. Wang,Jennifer G. Robinson,Salim S. Virani,Veronique L. Roger,Peter W. F. Wilson,Anne C. Goldberg,Eric D. Peterson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3680

2018-12-01

JAMA Cardiology

Abstract:Importance: Practice guidelines recommend that clinicians engage patients in treatment decisions and explain atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk but do not describe how to communicate this risk most effectively.Objective: To determine how the ASCVD risk time horizon, outcome, and presentation format influence risk perceptions and treatment preferences.Design, Setting, and Participants: From May 27, 2015, through November 12, 2015, participants from the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management Registry at 140 US cardiology, primary care, and endocrinology practices were presented 3 independent scenarios (representing the same hypothetical patient) and asked to rate their perceived risk and willingness to take medication to lower risk in light of (1) a 15% 10-year ASCVD event risk, (2) a 4% 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) death risk, and (3) a 50% lifetime ASCVD event risk.Exposures: Participants were randomized to receive risk estimates using numbers only, a bar graph, or a face pictogram.Results: Of 3566 eligible participants, 2708 (76.9%) responded (median age, 67 years [interquartile range, 61-76 years]; 280 [10.3%] African American; 1491 men [55.1%]). When shown the lifetime ASCVD risk, respondents were more likely to consider the risk "high to very high" than when presented the 10-year ASCVD risk or the CVD death risk (70.1% vs 31.4% vs 25.7%, respectively; both P < .001). Treatment willingness was also the highest for lifetime ASCVD risk (77.9% very willing) followed by 10-year ASCVD risk (68.1%) and 10-year CVD death risk (63.1%; both P < .001). Compared with participants who were shown a bar graph or no graphic, those who were shown the risk information with a pictogram had the lowest perception of disease severity and the lowest willingness to consider therapy. These findings were robust across demographic and socioeconomic subgroups.Conclusions and Relevance: The format, time horizon, and outcome used for risk estimation influence patient perceptions and should be considered when designing risk communication tools. When shown lifetime risk estimates, patients had higher risk perception and willingness for therapy than when shown 10-year estimates. Pictogram risk displays may decrease risk perception and consideration for treatment.

medicine, general & internal
Effective communication and shared decision making: Theoretical approach from the doctor-patient relationship approach

Javier Gonzalez-Argote

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/mw202212

2022-12-11

Abstract:Introduction: shared decision making is understood as a communicational model in which health personnel collaborate with the patient or caregiver in making optimal health decisions, encouraging patients, family members and physicians to evaluate clinical information and compare risk-benefit in order to select the most appropriate treatment option.Objective: to characterize shared decision making as a model of patient-physician communication.Development: the method has gained acceptance among the medical community in recent years; despite having an approach in line with current medicine due to benefits such as a decrease in medical errors, being associated with a better overall quality of decisions and less decisional conflict, its use is controversial due to weaknesses such as lack of practical guidelines for its use, lack of training for the parties involved, lack of time and applicability due to the patient's characteristics. Shared decision support tools provide information about the options and potentially expected outcomes for a person's health status, and are different from traditional educational materials. Conclusions: shared decision making emerges as a method of patient-physician communication centered on the participation of the patient in his or her medical therapy and is credited with reducing decisional uncertainty. The scientific evidence is insufficient to recommend its use over traditional methods, although its application has gained acceptance among the international community in recent years.
The effectiveness of personalized coronary heart disease and stroke risk communication

Benjamin J. Powers,Susanne Danus,Janet M. Grubber,Maren K. Olsen,Eugene Z. Oddone,Hayden B. Bosworth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.12.021

IF: 5.099

2011-04-01

American Heart Journal

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend global risk assessment to guide vascular risk factor management; however, most provider-patient communication focuses on individual risk factors in isolation. We sought to evaluate the impact of personalized coronary heart disease and stroke risk communication on patients' knowledge, beliefs, and health behavior.METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial testing personalized risk communication based on Framingham stroke and coronary heart disease risk scores compared with a standard risk factor education. A total of 89 patients were recruited from primary care clinics and followed up for 3 months. Outcomes included the following: risk perception and worry, risk factor knowledge, risk reduction preferences and decision conflict, medication adherence, health behaviors, and blood pressure.RESULTS: Participants had a very low understanding of numeric information, high perceived risk for stroke or myocardial infarction, and high proportion of medication nonadherence. Patients' ability to identify vascular risk factors increased with personalized risk communication (mean 1.8 additional risk factors, 95% CI 1.3-2.2) and standard risk factor education (mean 1.6 additional risk factors, 95% CI 1.1-2.1) immediately after the intervention but was not sustained at 3 months. Patients in the personalized group had less decision conflict than the standard risk factor education group over intended risk reduction strategies (5.9 vs 10.1, P = .003). There was no appreciable impact of either communication strategy on medication adherence, exercise, smoking cessation, or blood pressure.CONCLUSIONS: Personalized risk communication was preferred by patients and had a small impact on risk reduction preferences and decision conflict but had no impact on patient beliefs or behavior compared with standard risk factor education.
The problematic of decision-sharing: deconstructing 'cholesterol' in a clinical encounter

Richard Gwyn,Glyn Elwyn,Adrian Edwards,Annabelle Mooney

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00245.x

Abstract:Shared decision-making is increasingly advocated as a means of interacting with patients but there is also a widely accepted view that many factors will militate against this ideal. While some patients may not wish to take on the responsibility of decision-making, it is also evident that many find it difficult to assimilate probabilities about future events and overestimate the likelihood of some outcomes, especially when terms such as 'stroke', 'bleeding' and 'heart attack' are used in consultation and bring with them emotional connotations and reactions. Under such circumstances, should clinicians portray risks as best they can, in the hope that even a marginally improved understanding will be an improvement on unilateral professional decision-making? Or, conversely, should they 'guide' the decision process, acting in a way that is known as 'professional agency'? Developing some perspectives put forward in recent work by the authors and applying it to a distinct clinical context, this paper will provide (i) a discourse analytic exploration of a single extended example from clinical practice employing aspects of Bakhtin's theory of dialogism, and (ii) a discussion and summary of what we can learn from this analysis in the context of shared decision-making and risk communication.
Effect of Patient-Provider Communication on Patient Risk Awareness: the Moderating Role of Trust Based on Scenario Experiment

Huiling Hu,Haiyan Gong,Xuanna Wu,Xue Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.530

IF: 1.559

2022-01-01

PsyCh Journal

Abstract:Good patient-provider communication and high level of trust can decrease patients' risk perception and promote their acceptability of medical risks.The extent to which communication can be effective may be distinguished by different levels of trust. The present study examined the effect of patient-provider communication and treatment outcome on patients' risk awareness, and explored the moderating effect of trust. This research adopted a paper-based scenario experiment with a 2 (communication: good vs. poor) x 2 (treatment outcome: good vs. poor) between-subjects design. Three hundred sixteen college students were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to four groups and instructed to read more information about the two independent variables. Finally, all participants finished the manipulation check (eight items), affect- and cognition-based trust scales (10 items), and risk awareness scales (eight items) by questionnaire. The results showed the positive interaction effects between communication and treatment outcome on patients' acceptance of uncertainties. Affect- and cognition-based trust had similar moderating mechanisms on the interaction effect of communication and treatment outcome on uncertainty acceptability, and different moderating mechanisms on patient risk perception. In clinical work, we should develop the strategy to improve patien-provider communication and trust to improve patients' acceptability of uncertainty.
From Calculation to Communication: Using Risk Score Calculators to Inform Clinical Decision Making and Facilitate Patient Engagement

Hoda Fakhari,Courtney L. Scherr,Sydney Moe,Christin Hoell,Maureen E. Smith,Laura J. Rasmussen-Torvik,Rex L. Chisholm,Elizabeth M. McNally

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x241285036

2024-10-09

Medical Decision Making

Abstract:Medical Decision Making, Ahead of Print. BackgroundRisk score calculators are a widely developed tool to support clinicians in identifying and managing risk for certain diseases. However, little is known about physicians' applied experiences with risk score calculators and the role of risk score estimates in clinical decision making and patient communication.MethodsPhysicians providing care in outpatient community-based clinical settings (N = 20) were recruited to participate in semi-structured individual interviews to assess their use of risk score calculators in practice. Two study team members conducted an inductive thematic analysis using a consensus-based coding approach.ResultsParticipants referenced at least 20 risk score calculators, the most common being the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculator. Ecological factors related to the clinical system (e.g., time), patient (e.g., receptivity), and physician (e.g., experience) influenced conditions and patterns of risk score calculator use. For example, compared with attending physicians, residents tended to use a greater variety of risk score calculators and with higher frequency. Risk score estimates were generally used in clinical decision making to improve or validate clinical judgment and in patient communication to serve as a motivational tool.ConclusionsThe degree to which risk score estimates influenced physician decision making and whether and how these scores were communicated to patients varied, reflecting a nuanced role of risk score calculator use in clinical practice. The theory of planned behavior can help explain how attitudes, beliefs, and norms shape the use of risk score estimates in clinical decision making and patient communication. Additional research is needed to evaluate best practices in the use of risk score calculators and risk score estimates.HighlightsThe risk score calculators and estimates that participants referenced in this study represented a range of conditions (e.g., heart disease, anxiety), levels of model complexity (e.g., probability calculations, scales of severity), and output formats (e.g., point estimates, risk intervals).Risk score calculators that are easily accessed, have simple inputs, and are trusted by physicians appear more likely to be used.Risk score estimates were generally used in clinical decision making to improve or validate clinical judgment and in patient communication to serve as a motivational tool.Risk score estimates helped participants manage the uncertainty and complexity of various clinical situations, yet consideration of the limitations of these estimates was relatively minimal.Developers of risk score calculators should consider the patient- (e.g., response to risk score estimates) and physician- (e.g., training status) related characteristics that influence risk score calculator use in addition that of the clinical system.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics,health policy & services
Communicating cardiovascular risk: Systematic review of qualitative evidence

Theo Lorenc,Gillian Stokes,Helen Fulbright,Katy Sutcliffe,Amanda Sowden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108231

IF: 3.467

2024-02-01

Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular risk prediction models are widely used to help individuals understand risk and make decisions.METHODS: Systematic review of qualitative evidence. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL. We included English-language qualitative studies on the communication of cardiovascular risk. We assessed study quality using Hawker et al.'s tool and synthesised data thematically.RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were included. Many patients think that risk scores are of limited practical value. Other sources of information feed into informal estimates of risk, which may lead patients to reject the results of clinical risk assessment when the two conflict. Clinicians identify a number of barriers to risk communication, including patients' limited understanding of risk and excessive anxiety. They use a range of strategies for adapting risk communication. Both clinicians and individuals express specific preferences for risk communication formats.DISCUSSION: Ways of communicating risk that provide some comparison or reference point seem more promising. The broader context of communication around risk may be more important than the risk scoring instrument. Risk communication interventions, in practice, may be more about appeals to emotion than a rationalistic model of decision-making.

public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, interdisciplinary
How Does Patient Provider Communication Affect Patients' Risk Perception? A Scenario Experiment and an Exploratory Investigation.

Chao Sun,Dong Wei,Haiyan Gong,Xue Ding,Xue Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12872

2020-01-01

International Journal of Nursing Practice

Abstract:AIM:The aim of the study was to examine whether patient-provider communication interacts with treatment outcomes to influence patients' risk perception.BACKGROUND:Medical uncertainties and risks are among the most serious problems faced by patients. This is exacerbated by communication failure in patient-provider relationships and poor treatment outcomes. However, we do not know how communication and treatment outcomes shape patients' risk perception and concern about uncertainty.DESIGN:The study is a two-by-two between-subjects design.METHODS:Two studies were conducted and data were collected in 2019. Each study used a different research design and different samples: Study 1 used a scenario experiment with 120 undergraduate students; and Study 2 surveyed 200 inpatients in clinical settings.RESULTS:The convergent results found a significant interaction between patient-provider communication and treatment outcome on the perception of medical risks among the participants.CONCLUSION:Patient-provider communication interacts with treatment outcome to influence patients' perceived risk about uncertainties for healthcare. Clinicians and nurses should be aware of the effects of patient-provider communication on patients' risk perception in their concerns about the uncertainties of treatment and pay much more attention to good healthcare relationship building in addition to the improvement of objective treatment outcome.
Temporal trends in bisphenol A exposure in the United States from 2003-2012 and factors associated with BPA exposure: Spot samples and urine dilution complicate data interpretation.

J. LaKind,D. Naiman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.013

IF: 8.3

2015-10-01

Environmental Research

Abstract:
Effects of protein nutrition on cell-mediated immunity.

E. Copeland,J. Daly,E. Guinn,S. Dudrick

Abstract:
Evaluation and Modification of a Shared Decision-Making Tool for Peanut Allergy Management

Yaworsky, Andrew

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-024-01146-w

2024-04-20

Current Allergy and Asthma Reports

Abstract:Based on shared decision-making (SDM) principles, a decision aid was previously developed to help patients, their caregivers, and physicians decide which peanut allergy management approach best suits them. This study refined the decision aid's content to better reflect patients' and caregivers' lived experience.

immunology,allergy
Navigating the landscape of food allergies: Insights and perspectives from the AMCP Market Insights Program

Terry Richardson,Brian P Vickery,Ruchi Gupta,Fred Goldstein,Michael Kobernick,Vivien Chan,Susan Wescott,Gaurang Gandhi,Tonya Winders

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.8-a.s1

Abstract:AMCP convened a panel of clinical and managed care experts to identify insights regarding the prevalence, clinical manifestations, and management approaches for immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergies. This article aims to summarize expert perspectives on health care system challenges and areas of agreement concerning the management of food allergies, and to advance payers' understanding of their role in supporting health care for patients with food allergies. Food allergy management requires dietary modification and is associated with significant patient and caregiver burdens. Emerging therapies provide hope for those living with food allergies but will likely lead to a rise in health plan pharmacy expenses. In considering the value of new treatments, it is important to consider the total cost of care and the value of preventing anaphylaxis and enhancing the patient's quality of life. Several challenges remain in identifying the appropriate patient population for treatment with newer agents and in optimizing treatment outcomes. Addressing health disparities will require standardized clinical protocols, better access to specialized allergy care, and management of comorbid conditions.
Communicating health risk in chronic kidney disease: a scoping review

Emma Caton,Ros Aird,Maria Da Silva-Gane,Sivakumar Sridharan,David Wellsted,Shivani Sharma,Ken Farrington

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-024-02098-0

IF: 4.4061

2024-11-10

Journal of Nephrology

Abstract:Communicating risk is a key component of shared decision-making and is vital for the management of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite this, there is little evidence to suggest how best to communicate health risk information to people living with CKD. The aim of this review was to identify and understand the nature of evidence-based risk communication strategies for people living with CKD.

urology & nephrology

Microbiomes, metabolic errors and detection of performance enhancing drug abuse1,2.

Inter-cohort differences in coronary heart disease mortality in the 25-year follow-up of the seven countries study

Safe Medication Use Based on Knowledge of Information about Contraindications Concerning Cross Allergy and Comprehensive Clinical Intervention

Communicating Risk in Imaging: A Scoping Review of Risk Presentation in Patient Decision Aids

Antimicrobial prophylaxis of infective endocarditis: effect of BSAC recommendations on compliance in general practice.

Teaching Medical Students to Communicate Risks Like Military Intelligence Analysts

Aids to improve understanding of statistical risk in patients consenting for surgery and interventional procedures: A systematic review

[Portocaval emergency shunt in severe esophageal varices hemorrhage].

Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Communication Tools and Presentation Formats on Patient Perceptions and Preferences

Effective communication and shared decision making: Theoretical approach from the doctor-patient relationship approach

The effectiveness of personalized coronary heart disease and stroke risk communication

The problematic of decision-sharing: deconstructing 'cholesterol' in a clinical encounter

Effect of Patient-Provider Communication on Patient Risk Awareness: the Moderating Role of Trust Based on Scenario Experiment

From Calculation to Communication: Using Risk Score Calculators to Inform Clinical Decision Making and Facilitate Patient Engagement

Communicating cardiovascular risk: Systematic review of qualitative evidence

How Does Patient Provider Communication Affect Patients' Risk Perception? A Scenario Experiment and an Exploratory Investigation.

Temporal trends in bisphenol A exposure in the United States from 2003-2012 and factors associated with BPA exposure: Spot samples and urine dilution complicate data interpretation.

Effects of protein nutrition on cell-mediated immunity.

Evaluation and Modification of a Shared Decision-Making Tool for Peanut Allergy Management

Navigating the landscape of food allergies: Insights and perspectives from the AMCP Market Insights Program

Communicating health risk in chronic kidney disease: a scoping review