Benzoxazole/benzothiazole‐derived VEGFR‐2 inhibitors: Design, synthesis, molecular docking, and anticancer evaluations
Abdel‐Ghany A. El‐Helby,Helmy Sakr,Ibrahim H. Eissa,Ahmed A. Al‐Karmalawy,Khaled El‐Adl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.201900178
2019-10-09
Archiv der Pharmazie
Abstract:<p>A novel series of benzoxazole/benzothiazole derivatives <b>4a–c</b>–<b>11a–e</b> were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for anticancer activity against HepG2, HCT‐116, and MCF‐7 cells. HCT‐116 was the most sensitive cell line to the influence of the new derivatives. In particular, compound <b>4c</b> was found to be the most potent derivative against HepG2, HCT‐116, and MCF‐7 cells, with IC<sub>50</sub> values = 9.45 ± 0.8, 5.76 ± 0.4, and 7.36 ± 0.5 µM, respectively. Compounds <b>4b</b>, <b>9f</b>, and <b>9c</b> showed the highest anticancer activities against HepG2 cells with IC<sub>50</sub> values of 9.97 ± 0.8, 9.99 ± 0.8, and 11.02 ± 1.0 µM, respectively, HCT‐116 cells with IC<sub>50</sub> values of 6.99 ± 0.5, 7.44 ± 0.4, and 8.15 ± 0.8 µM, respectively, and MCF‐7 cells with IC<sub>50</sub> values of 7.89 ± 0.7, 8.24 ± 0.7, and 9.32 ± 0.7 µM, respectively, in comparison with sorafenib as reference drug with IC<sub>50</sub> values of 9.18 ± 0.6, 5.47 ± 0.3, and 7.26 ± 0.3 µM, respectively. The most active compounds <b>4a–c</b>, <b>9b,c,e,f,h</b>, and <b>11c,e</b> were further evaluated for their VEGFR‐2 inhibition. Compounds <b>4c</b> and <b>4b</b> potently inhibited VEGFR‐2 at IC<sub>50</sub> values of 0.12 ± 0.01 and 0.13 ± 0.02 µM, respectively, which are nearly equipotent to the sorafenib IC<sub>50</sub> value (0.10 ± 0.02 µM). Furthermore, molecular docking studies were performed for all synthesized compounds to assess their binding pattern and affinity toward the VEGFR‐2 active site.</p>
pharmacology & pharmacy,chemistry, medicinal, multidisciplinary