Impact of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions during the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Prevalence of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Hospitalized Children with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

José J. Leija-Martínez,Luis A. Esparza-Miranda,Gerardo Rivera-Alfaro,Daniel E. Noyola
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/v16030429
2024-03-11
Viruses
Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) were implemented in order to control the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, potentially affecting the prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). This review evaluated the impact of NPIs on RSV-related hospitalizations in children during the lockdown (2020–2021) compared to the pre-pandemic (2015–2020) and post-lockdown (2021–2022) periods. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published in English between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2022. Additionally, we conducted hand searches of other records published between 1 January 2023 and 22 January 2024. Our target population was hospitalized children aged 0–18 years with RSV-related lower respiratory tract infections confirmed through immunofluorescence, antigen testing, or molecular assays. We focused on peer-reviewed observational studies, analyzing the primary outcome of pooled RSV prevalence. A generalized linear mixed model with a random-effects model was utilized to pool each RSV prevalence. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics, while publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger's tests. We identified and analyzed 5815 publications and included 112 studies with 308,985 participants. Notably, RSV prevalence was significantly lower during the lockdown period (5.03% [95% CI: 2.67; 9.28]) than during the pre-pandemic period (25.60% [95% CI: 22.57; 28.88], p < 0.0001). However, RSV prevalence increased notably in the post-lockdown period after the relaxation of COVID-19 prevention measures (42.02% [95% CI: 31.49; 53.33] vs. 5.03% [95% CI: 2.67; 9.28], p < 0.0001). Most pooled effect estimates exhibited significant heterogeneity (I2: 91.2% to 99.3%). Our findings emphasize the effectiveness of NPIs in reducing RSV transmission. NPIs should be considered significant public health measures to address RSV outbreaks.
virology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the impact of non - pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) implemented during the COVID - 19 pandemic on the prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in hospitalized children with lower respiratory tract infections. Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the impact of NPIs on RSV - related hospitalization rates during the lockdown period (2020 - 2021), before the pandemic (2015 - 2020), and after the lockdown was lifted (2021 - 2022). ### Research Background - **RSV** is the main cause of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in young children, especially in autumn and winter, with a relatively high incidence. - During the **COVID - 19** pandemic, various non - pharmaceutical interventions (such as social distancing, wearing masks, closing schools, etc.) were implemented in different countries, and these measures may have affected the transmission pattern of RSV. ### Research Objectives - **Primary objective**: To evaluate the impact of NPIs on the prevalence of RSV during the pandemic, especially the comparison between the lockdown period and before the pandemic and after the lockdown was lifted. - **Secondary objective**: To analyze the changes in RSV prevalence in different age groups, different regions, and under different diagnostic methods. ### Methods - **Data sources**: Relevant studies published from January 2015 to December 2022 were searched through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, and literature from January 2023 to January 2024 was supplemented by manual retrieval. - **Inclusion criteria**: Studies on RSV - related LRTIs in hospitalized children aged 0 - 18 years, confirmed by immunofluorescence, antigen detection, or molecular detection. - **Statistical analysis**: Generalized linear mixed models and random - effects models were used to summarize each RSV prevalence and to assess heterogeneity and publication bias. ### Main Findings - **During the lockdown**: The RSV prevalence was significantly reduced (5.03% [95% confidence interval: 2.67; 9.28]), much lower than that before the pandemic (25.60% [95% confidence interval: 22.57; 28.88]). - **After the lockdown was lifted**: The RSV prevalence increased significantly (42.02% [95% confidence interval: 31.49; 53.33]), higher than that during the lockdown. ### Conclusions - **Effectiveness of NPIs**: The research results emphasize the effectiveness of NPIs in reducing RSV transmission and suggest that they should be regarded as important public health measures to deal with RSV outbreaks. ### Keywords - Respiratory syncytial virus; Non - pharmaceutical interventions; Lockdown; COVID - 19; SARS - CoV - 2; Respiratory infections Through this systematic review and meta - analysis, the research team has provided strong evidence indicating that NPIs have a significant effect in controlling RSV transmission, providing an important reference for future public health decision - making.