Establishment of PM10 and PM2.5 emission inventories from wind erosion source and simulation of its environmental impact based on WEPS-Models3 in southern Xinjiang, China

Yaxin Liu,Yu Teng,Shuang Liang,Xiaoli Li,Jingwen Zhao,Mei Shan,Li Chen,Hai Yu,Jian Mao,Hui Zhang,Shuang Gao,Yanling Sun,Zhenxing Ma,Zhipeng Bai,Wen Yang,Merched Azzi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118222
IF: 5
2021-03-01
Atmospheric Environment
Abstract:<p>Southern Xinjiang located in the far northwest of China is experiencing serious particulate matter (PM) pollution. The wind erosion has been recognized as a great contributor of PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in southern Xinjiang. In this study we developed a method that used the Wind Erosion Prediction System (WEPS) to establish the PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> emission inventories from the wind erosion source in southern Xinjiang with a 10 km × 10 km spatial resolution and a temporal resolution of one month. The PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> emission inventories from wind erosion sources were provided as input to the Models3/SMOKE (Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emission). The Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model was employed to simulate PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations from wind erosion source and the results were compared with the monitoring data to verify the emission inventories. The total PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions were 12 × 10<sup>6</sup> t and 4 × 10<sup>6</sup> t, respectively, and the emission per unit area were 14.6 t/km<sup>2</sup> and 4.9 t/km<sup>2</sup>, respectively, in southern Xinjiang in 2016. The PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions per unit area were highest in Kashi being 19.1 t/km<sup>2</sup> and 9.1 t/km<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The total emissions peaked at 5.4 × 10<sup>6</sup> t/km<sup>2</sup> in PM<sub>10</sub> and 1.4 × 10<sup>6</sup> t/km<sup>2</sup> in PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Bazhou. The PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions were highest in spring, followed by summer, winter and autumn. The Normalized Mean Error (NME) between the predicted monthly average PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations from wind erosion source and the results from multiplying the monitoring data by the source apportionment results of PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> were 25.3% and 26.1%, respectively, which indicated that the accuracies of the PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> emission inventories from wind erosion source in southern Xinjiang were satisfactory.</p>
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?