A Case Report of Intrauterine Device Migration: Uterine Penetration and Bladder Involvement with Secondary Stones 3 Years Post-Insertion
ZhiLong Chen,Zhong Lv,YunFeng Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s492865
2024-11-10
International Journal of Women s Health
Abstract:ZhiLong Chen, Zhong Lv, YunFeng Shi Department of Urology, Wujin People's Hospital, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213100, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Zhong Lv, Department of Urology, Changzhou Wujin People's Hospital, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213017, People's Republic of China, Tel +86-13584328748, Email Background: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are among the most popular contraceptive methods globally due to their convenience and cost-effectiveness. However, improper placement can lead to complications such as device migration and uterine perforation, with increased risk observed when IUDs are implanted within four to six weeks postpartum. Typically, patients are asymptomatic or experience mild lower abdominal discomfort or minor abnormal vaginal bleeding following IUD displacement. Advances in diagnostic techniques have resulted in an increased reporting of uterine perforations due to IUD migration. Although rare, secondary stone formation following IUD perforation has been noted. In 2023, cases of IUD perforation were reported in women with a history of multiple cesarean sections and in a young woman without detailed marital history. Prior Presentation: The 43-year-old patient, who had an IUD inserted three years prior, exhibited symptoms of frequent urination and painful urination unrelieved by anti-infective and analgesic treatments. The patient underwent cystotomy for foreign body removal, which revealed the IUD had perforated the uterus and bladder, with both arms of the device invaded into bladder wall and covered with concentric stone layers. Complete removal of the IUD and surrounding stones, followed by suturing and postoperative anti-infection analgesic treatment, led to significant symptom improvement. Conclusion: This case underscores the importance of regular IUD check-ups to prevent uterine perforation and the necessity of considering IUD migration in patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms without routine IUD examination. While self-examination by the patient through the strings in the vagina is possible, imaging studies are also indispensable. Surgery has proven to be an effective solution for such complications, but cystoscopy is not always the best option, and the decision to perform open surgery should be based on the patient's perforation and the condition of the surrounding tissues. This paper emphasizes the need for vigilance and proper clinical management. Keywords: IUD, migration, bladder stone, cystoscopy, computed tomography IUD is widely used around the world, the rates of IUD insertion vary by region, with over 80% of global intrauterine IUD users residing in Asia, and nearly two-thirds (64%) of them living in China. 1 IUD perforation is a complication that warrants attention, and its occurrence is related to the material of the IUD, the timing of pregnancy, and the state of insertion. The most common complication of IUD perforation is adhesion to the greater omentum, which can lead to small intestinal obstruction; 2 moreover, IUD migration into the Pelvis cavity is a rare but serious occurrence, with an incidence rate of 1%, 3 and cases involving migration into the bladder with secondary stone. The surface of displaced IUD is more likely to form stones and induce urinary system symptoms such as bladder irritation. Empirical anti-infective therapy is not effective for these patients, but surgery is an effective solution. Here, we present a case of IUD insertion in a normal uterus more than one month postpartum, complicated by migration and stone formation. A 43-year-old woman, who had no inducing factors of frequent urination and painful urination for 1 week, had no obvious relief after anti-infective treatment, so she came to our department for further remedy. She had normal menstruation, often accompanied by lower abdominal discomfort in the premenstrual period. The patient gave birth to a child three years ago and subsequently underwent an IUD implant procedure with a copper IUD, which was performed more than a month after the birth. After the insertion, she experienced more severe menstrual cramps than usual, but did not seek medical attention. During the treatment in our hospital, her vital signs were stable and her physical examination showed nothing wrong. Urinalysis showed WBC (-). Blood test showed CRP:6.3 mg/l, GFR:112 mL/min, Scr:82 μmol/L. Pelvic ultrasound suggested the possibility of a foreign body in the posterior wall of the bladder. Because the ultrasound imaging of IUD is affected by the composition and migrated orientation of IUD. 4 We further performed CT imaging of the urinary system, CT showed that a T-shaped hyperdense shadow could -Abstract Truncated-
obstetrics & gynecology