Expertise-based bid evaluation for construction-contractor selection with generalized comparative linguistic ELECTRE III

Zhen-Song Chen,Xuan Zhang,Rosa M. Rodríguez,Witold Pedrycz,Luis Martínez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103578

IF: 10.3

2021-05-01

Automation in Construction

Abstract:<p>The process of bid evaluation is subject to indetermination, imprecision, and uncertainty in terms of their alternative-criterion decision appraisals. To address this issue, this paper develops a novel ELECTRE III-based MCGDM approach for bid evaluation, in which generalized comparative linguistic expressions (GCLEs) are used to evaluate bidder performance. The collected GCLEs are further transformed into possibility-distribution-based hesitant fuzzy linguistic-term sets (HFLTSs) to facilitate the qualitative construction of individual expertise. A consensus-reaching process is introduced to promote decisions that are agreed upon by experts and thereby ensure an enhanced state of mutual agreement among the experts. Subsequently, an integrated subjective-objective approach is proposed to calculate criterion weights and to implement an ELECTRE III-based method that incorporates HFLTS possibility distributions, which allows us to treat the indetermination, imprecision, and uncertainty embedded in appraisals of alternative-criterion decisions when evaluating bids. The potential advantages of the proposed approach are validated by a real-life contractor-selection case.</p>

construction & building technology,engineering, civil

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to address the issues of uncertainty and ambiguity in bid evaluation during the selection process of construction contractors. Specifically, traditional bid evaluation methods often have the following shortcomings:

1. **Compensatory Issue**: Traditional methods allow poor performance in one attribute to be compensated by high performance in other attributes, which is unacceptable in construction projects because any weakness of a contractor can severely impact the entire project.

2. **Inadequate Handling of Uncertainty and Ambiguity**: Existing methods fail to effectively handle uncertainty and ambiguity in bid evaluation, especially in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM).

3. **Subjectivity in Expert Weighting**: Existing methods usually determine expert weights subjectively, which may lead to unfair evaluation results and do not consider the expertise level of the experts.

4. **Lack of Consensus Mechanism**: Current bid evaluation models fail to address disagreements among experts and do not introduce a consensus-reaching process.

5. **Single Weighting of Evaluation Criteria**: Existing methods either rely entirely on subjective judgment or objective data to determine the weights of evaluation criteria, without combining the advantages of both.

6. **Limitations of Single Granularity Linguistic Sets**: Existing methods use single granularity linguistic sets to evaluate different criteria, but different criteria have different uncertainties, which may lead to inappropriate evaluation results.

To address these issues, this paper proposes a multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) method based on ELECTRE III and hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTS) with possibility distribution. The main contributions of this method include:

- **Introduction of Generalized Comparative Linguistic Expressions (GCLEs)**: Allowing experts to oscillate between multiple linguistic values to handle ambiguity and uncertainty in bid evaluation.
- **Generation of HFLTS Possibility Distribution**: Converting GCLEs into HFLTS possibility distribution for better understanding and calculation of hesitant fuzzy linguistic information.
- **Introduction of Consensus Reaching Process (CRP)**: Addressing disagreements among experts to ensure consensus in the evaluation process.
- **Use of Multi-Granularity Linguistic Sets**: Using different granularity linguistic sets according to the uncertainty of different criteria, reducing restrictions on experts.
- **Objective Weight Calculation Method Based on Expert Expertise**: Objectively calculating expert weights by combining characteristics such as hesitation, interest, preference, consensus degree, and experience of the experts.
- **Comprehensive Evaluation Criteria System**: Considering multiple aspects of criteria such as technical, commercial, and health safety environment (HSE) to ensure comprehensive evaluation.
- **Combination of Subjective and Objective Methods to Determine Criteria Weights**: Proposing a distance entropy-based method to determine objective criteria weights and obtaining subjective criteria weights through online questionnaires.

Through these improvements, this method aims to enhance the accuracy and reliability of bid evaluation, thereby helping project owners select the most suitable contractor.