Abstract:Divergence time estimation-the calibration of a phylogeny to geological time-is an integral first step in modeling the tempo of biological evolution (traits and lineages). However, despite increasingly sophisticated methods to infer divergence times from molecular genetic sequences, the estimated age of many nodes across the tree of life contrast significantly and consistently with timeframes conveyed by the fossil record. This is perhaps best exemplified by crown angiosperms, where molecular clock (Triassic) estimates predate the oldest (Early Cretaceous) undisputed angiosperm fossils by tens of millions of years or more. While the incompleteness of the fossil record is a common concern, issues of data limitation and model inadequacy are viable (if underexplored) alternative explanations. In this vein, Beaulieu et al. (2015) convincingly demonstrated how methods of divergence time inference can be misled by both (i) extreme state-dependent molecular substitution rate heterogeneity and (ii) biased sampling of representative major lineages. These results demonstrate the impact of (potentially common) model violations. Here, we suggest another potential challenge: that the configuration of the statistical inference problem (i.e., the parameters, their relationships, and associated priors) alone may preclude the reconstruction of the paleontological timeframe for the crown age of angiosperms. We demonstrate, through sampling from the joint prior (formed by combining the tree (diversification) prior with the calibration densities specified for fossil-calibrated nodes) that with no data present at all, that an Early Cretaceous crown angiosperms is rejected (i.e., has essentially zero probability). More worrisome, however, is that for the 24 nodes calibrated by fossils, almost all have indistinguishable marginal prior and posterior age distributions when employing routine lognormal fossil calibration priors. These results indicate that there is inadequate information in the data to over-rule the joint prior. Given that these calibrated nodes are strategically placed in disparate regions of the tree, they act to anchor the tree scaffold, and so the posterior inference for the tree as a whole is largely determined by the pseudodata present in the (often arbitrary) calibration densities. We recommend, as for any Bayesian analysis, that marginal prior and posterior distributions be carefully compared to determine whether signal is coming from the data or prior belief, especially for parameters of direct interest. This recommendation is not novel. However, given how rarely such checks are carried out in evolutionary biology, it bears repeating. Our results demonstrate the fundamental importance of prior/posterior comparisons in any Bayesian analysis, and we hope that they further encourage both researchers and journals to consistently adopt this crucial step as standard practice. Finally, we note that the results presented here do not refute the biological modeling concerns identified by Beaulieu et al. (2015). Both sets of issues remain apposite to the goals of accurate divergence time estimation, and only by considering them in tandem can we move forward more confidently.

Abundance–diversity relationship as a unique signature of temporal scaling in the fossil record

Apparent timescaling of fossil diversification rates is caused by sampling bias

Diversity-dependence brings molecular phylogenies closer to agreement with the fossil record

Global diversity dynamics in the fossil record are regionally heterogeneous

A mismatch between community assembly and abundance‐based diversity indices

Unveiling the underlying drivers of Phanerozoic marine diversification

Evolutionary change is remarkably time-independent across scales

Estimating Diversity Through Time using Molecular Phylogenies: Old and Species-Poor Frog Families are the Remnants of a Diverse Past

Toward a Theory for Diversity Gradients: the Abundance–adaptation Hypothesis

Standardizing fossil disparity metrics using sample coverage

A ubiquitous ~62 Myr periodic fluctuation superimposed on general trends in fossil biodiversity: II, Evolutionary dynamics associated with periodic fluctuation in marine diversity

Unveiling rare diversity by integrating museum, literature, and field data

Fossilization can mislead analyses of phenotypic disparity

A covariant model of molecular and diversification patterns through time and the history of large clades

Cross‐scale scaling‐law analyses for the heterogeneity and diversity of animal gut microbiomes from community to landscape

Ecological structure of diversity-dependent diversification in Phanerozoic marine bivalves

Tetrapod species-area relationships across the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction

Biodiversity across space and time in the fossil record

Environmental heterogeneity and dispersal limitation simultaneously determine the spatial scaling of different microbial functional groups

Extant timetrees are consistent with a myriad of diversification histories

The Past Sure is Tense: On Interpreting Phylogenetic Divergence Time Estimates