Targeted Vouchers, Competition Among Schools, and the Academic Achievement of Poor Students

Christopher A. Neilson
Abstract:In this paper I use detailed administrative data to study the effects of targeted school vouchers on the outcomes of poor children in Chile. A difference-in-differences analysis reveals that this reform raised the test scores of poor children significantly and closed the gap between these students and the rest of the population by one third. I estimate an empirical model of school choice to construct counter-factual simulations that allow me to isolate the different mechanisms through which this policy affected outcomes. In addition, the explicit modeling of schools’ choice of price and quality allows for the analysis of how the policy changed the nature of competition among schools. The model estimates imply that the observed policy effect is due mostly to the increase in the quality of schools in poor neighborhoods and not to a resorting of students to better schools or the entry of new higher-quality schools. The introduction of targeted vouchers is shown to have effectively raised competition in poor neighborhoods, pushing schools to improve their academic quality. † The author wishes to thank the Departamento de Estadisticas e Informacion de Salud del Ministerio de Salud (MINSAL), the Ministerio de Educacion (MINEDUC) of the government of Chile and DEMRE for facilitating joint work between government agencies that produced the data from Chile used in this study. The author also wishes to thank Joseph Altonji, Steve Berry, Sebastian Bustos, Prashant Bharadwaj, Ryan Cooper, Fabian Duarte, Francisco Gallego, Martin Hackmann, Phil Haile, Justine Hastings, Adam Kapor, Francisco Lagos, Paola Maino, Costas Meghir, Nicolas Rojas, Seth Zimmerman, and seminar participants at Yale for their comments and suggestions. I thank the Cowles Structural Microeconomics Program for financial support.
Economics,Education
What problem does this paper attempt to address?