A histochemical study of cholinergic fibres in the cerebral cortex.

K. Krnjević,A. Silver
1965-10-01
Journal of Anatomy
Abstract:Several kinds of evidence have led many authors to suggest that cholinergic transmission plays a role in cortical function. Acetylcholine (ACh) and related compounds apparently excite cortical neurones and this effect is abolished by cholinolytic agents which also interfere with normal activity( Bonnet & Bremer, 1937; Miller, Stavraky & Woonton, 1940; Feldberg, 1945; Bornstein, 1946; Bremer & Chatonnet, 1949; Hyde, Beckett & Gellhorn, 1949; Infantellina, 1955; Monnier & Romanowski, 1962; Ling, 1963). The cortex contains a substantial amount of ACh, choline acetylase and cholinesterase (ChE) (MacIntosh, 1941; Feldberg, 1945; Feldberg & Vogt, 1948; Burgen & Chipman, 1951; Pope, 1952; Hebb & Silver, 1956; Stone, 1957; Rosenzweig, Krech & Bennett, 1958; McCaman, 1963; Lewis, Shute & Silver, 1964), and there is a continual release of ACh in the cortex, at a rate bearing some relation to the level of cortical activity (MacIntosh & Oborin, 1953; Mitchell, 1963). Recent experiments have proved that some nerve cells in the mammalian neocortex can be excited by ACh applied directly from micropipettes (Krnjevic & Phillis, 1961,1963 a; Spehlmann & Kapp, 1961; Spehlmann, 1963). Further studies (Krnjevic & Phillis, 1963b) revealed certain characteristic features of these cholinoceptive cells. Although some were found in all regions of the neocortex, often in clusters, they seemed more common in or near the primary afferent areas. Perhaps their most notable feature was an uneven distribution in depth; few were found within 0-8 mm of the cortical surface and they were concentrated particularly within the middle range of depth, between 0-8 and 1-3 mm. Since most of the cells activated by antidromic stimulation of the medullary pyramids could be excited with ACh, cholinoceptive units in general appeared to be deep pyramidal neurones. Cholinoceptive cells often showed a typically irregular, spontaneous discharge, similar to the projection activity described by Dempsey & Morison (1943). Their ACh receptors had certain well-defined pharmacological properties (Krnjevic & Phillis, 1963c); they were especially sensitive to the muscarine-like actions of ACh (Dale, 1914) and other muscarinic agents, and were blocked specifically by muscarineantagonists, such as atropine and hyoscine. These cortical cells thus presented a sharp contrast to spinal cholinoceptive cells with predominantly nicotinic receptors (Eccles, Fatt & Koketsu, 1954). The most likely explanation for all these findings is that cortical cholinoceptive cells are innervated by cholinergic nerve endings. However, although various cerebral pathways were examined (Krnjevic & Phillis, 1963 b), a distinct cholinergic innervation could not be demonstrated by electrophysiological and pharmacological
What problem does this paper attempt to address?