Hearing Health Care: Review of a Report From the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

D. Blazer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-1209

IF: 39.2

2016-09-20

Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract:Hearing loss affects around 30 million persons in the United States (12.7% of those aged 12 years), and the frequency increases significantly with age (45.6% in persons aged 70 to 74 years and >80% in those aged 85 years) (13). This public health burden is especially important because, although interventions work for many people, the unmet need for hearing health care has been estimated at between 67% and 86% (4, 5). The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (of which the former Institute of Medicine is now part) recently released a report, Hearing Health Care for Adults: Priorities for Improving Access and Affordability (6), in which a panel of experts reached consensus on a series of key messages to health care providers and the public, as well as recommendations to the many stakeholders in the provision of hearing health care. The focus of the report is adults whose hearing capacity decreases over time. I served as chair of the committee that wrote the report, and in this article I review selected findings and recommendations that are especially relevant to physicians. Central to these recommendations is the importance of providing evidence-based information on hearing loss and hearing health care to our colleagues and patients. Even health care providers who are not specialists in hearing have a role to play in ensuring that hearing-related concerns expressed by patients are not simply dismissed as unimportant. Hearing is not only vital to communication; it is vital to health and can affect quality of life. Evidence exists that persons with hearing loss are at greater risk for adverse health outcomes, such as cognitive impairment, increased social isolation, and greater need of support from others (7, 8). The range of potential services available to those with hearing loss is poorly coordinated, expensive, and largely not understood by the general public. Many adults do not seek care because they cannot afford it. Others are concerned about the stigma that they believe is associated with decreased hearing ability, and still others dismiss hearing loss as a normal side effect of aging that cannot be helped. However, hearing health care offers a range of services and technologies: It can include audiometric testing and hearing aids, and it can include training persons with hearing loss to use strategies that enhance their ability to understand and communicate with others and to use hearing assistive technologies (for example, for listening to television). Hearing health care, except for audiometric testing prescribed by a physician and performed by an audiologist, is not covered by Medicare or most private health insurance plans (the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs does provide hearing health care to eligible persons). The time has come for health care providers, manufacturers, consumers, third-party payers, and regulatory bodies to address this major and neglected public health need. What steps can be taken to improve hearing health care? A multipronged approach is needed to improve the accessibility and affordability of hearing health care. We recommend that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration take 2 steps. First, the regulation requiring that patients either have a medical evaluation before being fitted for a hearing aid or sign a waiver of that evaluation should be removed. This regulation, which was originally designed to ensure that treatable medical conditions (such as cerumen impaction, ear infection, or acoustic neuroma) are not overlooked, is often circumvented by use of the waiver, and there is no evidence that it provides any clinically meaningful benefit. Second, a device category for over-the-counter wearable hearing devices should be implemented. We recommend that this new category require safe maximal sound output and be made available over the counter to expand options for adults with mild to moderate hearing loss. Other recommended measures for improving the affordability of hearing health care include increasing the transparency of fee structures by unbundling the costs of services and technologies to allow consumers to compare prices. Furthermore, options for covering hearing health care by programs (such as Medicare and Medicaid), employers, and private insurers should be evaluated. In addition, more awareness of vocational rehabilitation resources is needed among hearing health care professionals and persons with hearing loss. To further improve accessibility, our committee encouraged all stakeholders to evaluate new models of care, including but not limited to the use of community health workers, telehealth, mobile health, retail clinics, and self-administered hearing health care. Projects and studies to evaluate these options should include outcomes that are patient-centered and assess value, comparative effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness. Technological advances will undoubtedly change the horizon for persons with hearing loss. Innovation, especially disruptive innovation, could happen in the near future, but we cannot predict what it might entail. Nevertheless, one parameter of emerging technologies will be essential to improved hearing health care: compatibility of individual devices, such as hearing aids, with other communication systems. Persons with hearing loss frequently use hearing aids with telecoils or other hearing assistive technologies that couple with cell phones and a range of other communications systems. Efforts are needed to standardize the interfaces and connection of hearing aids, hearing assistive technologies, and over-the-counter wearable hearing devices with other types of technologies and communications systems. In addition, increased public awareness and consumer-friendly information on the availability, connectivity, and use of hearing aids and hearing assistive technologies is essential. However, such awareness is for naught unless standards are developed for an open-platform approach for hearing aid programming that allows any hearing health care professional (or, as evolving technology allows, the device owner) to program the device settings. Such standards should require disclosure of information about the programming features and programming portability of hearing aids before sale to enable consumers to make more informed purchasing decisions. Our committee affirmed the considerable progress and dedication of hearing health care professionals and professional societies, government agencies, industry, and advocacy groups in decreasing the effects of hearing loss over the past few years. Nevertheless, many opportunities for improvement remain to enable more persons to access the hearing health care services and technologies they need and to empower society to recognize hearing and communication as vital to the health and well-being of the public.