Abstract:Abstract Cell signal networks are orchestrated directly or indirectly by various peptide-mediated protein–protein interactions, which are normally weak and transient and thus ideal for biological regulation and medicinal intervention. Here, we develop a general-purpose method for modeling and predicting the binding affinities of protein–peptide interactions (PpIs) at the structural level. The method is a hybrid strategy that employs an unsupervised approach to derive a layered PpI atom–residue interaction (ulPpI[a-r]) potential between different protein atom types and peptide residue types from thousands of solved PpI complex structures and then statistically correlates the potential descriptors with experimental affinities (KD values) over hundreds of known PpI samples in a supervised manner to create an integrated unsupervised–supervised PpI affinity (usPpIA) predictor. Although both the ulPpI[a-r] potential and usPpIA predictor can be used to calculate PpI affinities from their complex structures, the latter seems to perform much better than the former, suggesting that the unsupervised potential can be improved substantially with a further correction by supervised statistical learning. We examine the robustness and fault-tolerance of usPpIA predictor when applied to treat the coarse-grained PpI complex structures modeled computationally by sophisticated peptide docking and dynamics simulation. It is revealed that, despite developed solely based on solved structures, the integrated unsupervised–supervised method is also applicable for locally docked structures to reach a quantitative prediction but can only give a qualitative prediction on globally docked structures. The dynamics refinement seems not to change (or improve) the predictive results essentially, although it is computationally expensive and time-consuming relative to peptide docking. We also perform extrapolation of usPpIA predictor to the indirect affinity quantities of HLA-A*0201 binding epitope peptides and NHERF PDZ binding scaffold peptides, consequently resulting in a good and moderate correlation of the predicted KD with experimental IC50 and BLU on the two peptide sets, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients Rp = 0.635 and 0.406, respectively.

InterPep2: global peptide-protein docking using interaction surface templates

Predicting protein-peptide interaction sites using distant protein complexes as structural templates

InterPepScore: a deep learning score for improving the FlexPepDock refinement protocol

In Silico Peptide Ligation: Iterative Residue Docking and Linking as a New Approach to Predict Protein-Peptide Interactions

PepBinding: A Workflow for Predicting Peptide Binding Structures by Combining Peptide Docking and Peptide Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Peptide binder design with inverse folding and protein structure prediction

PaFlexPepDock: Parallel Ab-Initio Docking of Peptides Onto Their Receptors with Full Flexibility Based on Rosetta.

MDockPeP: An ab‐initio protein–peptide docking server

Divide-and-link Peptide Docking: a Fragment-Based Peptide Docking Protocol.

Improved Docking of Polypeptides with Glide

Inferring Protein-Protein Interface from Geometry of Unbound Structures

Integrated unsupervised–supervised modeling and prediction of protein–peptide affinities at structural level

Identifying protein-protein interface via a novel multi-scale local sequence and structural representation

Comprehensive Evaluation of Fourteen Docking Programs on Protein-Peptide Complexes

Comparison of Two Docking Methods for Peptide-Protein Interactions.

Modeling beta‐sheet peptide‐protein interactions: Rosetta FlexPepDock in CAPRI rounds 38‐45

Compact assessment of molecular surface complementarities enhances neural network-aided prediction of key binding residues

Towards protein-protein docking with significant structural changes using CABS-dock

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions

PepPro: A Nonredundant Structure Data Set for Benchmarking Peptide-Protein Computational Docking

Flexible protein-peptide docking using CABS-dock with knowledge about the binding site