Abstract:Background: Many clinical studies have reported the high success rate of the All-on-4 concept. In the present study, we aimed to compare the stress distribution with different tilted distal implants and cantilever lengths in an All-on-4 system using the two-dimensional photoelastic method and to establish the All-on-4 implant photoelastic model by computer-aided design (CAD) and rapid prototyping (RP). METHODS: The data of the human edentulous mandible were acquired by computed tomography (CT). Three human edentulous mandible All-on-4 implant models with different distally inclined implant holes were fabricated using Mimic, Geomagic Studio software, and a light solidifying fast shaping machine. Then the final photoelastic models were established through the traditional method. Each of the three models had four NobelSpeedy Replace implants between the interforaminal regions. The two posterior implants were placed 0, 15, and 45 degrees distally before the mental foramen. The four implants were splinted by wrought cobalt-chromium alloy frameworks. Each of the three photoelastic models was submitted to a 150 N vertical load at five points on the framework: the central fossa of the mandibular first molar, and 0 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm of the cantilever length. The stress produced in the models was photographed with a digital camera, and the highest value of the stressed fringe pattern was recorded. Results: The All-on-4 implant photoelastic model established by CAD and RP was highly controllable and easy to modify. The position and inclination of implants were accurate, and the frameworks could be passively emplaced. The stress values were higher around a single tilted implant compared with the distal implant in All-on-4 with the same inclination. The 0-degree distal implant and 45-degree distal implant demonstrated the highest and lowest stress when loading at the central fossa of the mandibular first molar, respectively. With the same inclination of distal implant, the peri-implant bone stress increased as the length of cantilever increased. Conclusion: The method of establishing the All-on-4 implant photoelastic model by CAD and RP was highly controllable, convenient, fast, and accurate. The tilted implants splinted in the fully fixed prosthesis with reduced cantilever lengths did not increase the stress level compared with the vertical distal implants.And this illustrated that the influence of cantilever on stress distribution was greater than the influence of implant inlination.

Influence of a mesial cantilever on stress, strain, and axial force in fixed partial dentures with a distally tilted implant in the atrophic posterior maxilla

Effect of supporting implants inclination on stability of fixed partial denture: A finite element study

[Influence of attachment type on stress distribution of implant-supported removable partial dentures].

A finite element analysis to study the stress distribution on distal implants in an all-on-four situation in atrophic maxilla as affected by the tilt of the implants and varying cantilever lengths

Influence of occlusal contact and cusp inclination on the biomechanical character of a maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.

Influence of Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behaviour of Mandibular Implant-Retained/supported Overdentures: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

A Biomechanical Evaluation of Distal Tilting Implants in All-on-Four Rehabilitation with Mild Mandibular Resorption: A Finite Element Analysis Study

Effect of different implant configurations on biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported mandibular monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses

Biomechanical behaviour of tilted abutment after fixed partial denture restoration of CAD/CAM materials

Influence of incomplete ferrule on stress distribution of post and core restored maxillary premolar

Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: A finite element analysis

Biomechanical Performance of Different Implant Spacings and Placement Angles in Partial Fixed Denture Prosthesis Restorations: A Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical analysis of stress around the tilted implants with different cantilever lengths in all-on-4 concept

Stress Analysis for Different Designs of Implant-borne and Tooth-implant Fixed Partial Dentures in Mandibular Posterior Region

Comparison of Extramaxillary Anchored Implants, Tilted Implants, or Sinus Elevation Concepts on Stress Distribution in Atrophic Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis

Influence of prosthesis type and material on the stress distribution in bone around implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis

Stress distribution of single-implant-retained overdenture reinforced with a framework: A finite element analysis study

Influence of sagittal root positions on the stress distribution around custom-made root-analogue implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

Effects of Prosthetic Material and Framework Design on Stress Distribution in Dental Implants and Peripheral Bone: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Comparison of stress distribution around splinted and nonsplinted implants with different crown height space in posterior mandible: A finite element analysis study

Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis