The genetic origins of human cancer

R. Weinberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19880515)61:10<1963::AID-CNCR2820611005>3.0.CO;2-8

IF: 6.9209

1988-05-15

Cancer

Abstract:EDUCTIONISM HAS BEEN the driving obsesR sion of many biologists over the last decades. This obsession has camed us far through many of biology’s thorniest problems, including the search for the origins of cancer. Only a decade ago, few could have perceived even the outlines of our current corpus of results and insights. I will review my own travels through this field over this decade, in large part because they illustrate how many disparate fields of basic biological research have impinged on and pushed forward the work of those struggling to divine the origins of human cancer. Many molecular biologists kept a healthy distance from cancer research in the early and mid-1970s. The reasons were clear and oft-repeated. Molecular biology and genetics offered powerful tools for a clear understanding of single cell micro-organisms, but cancer seemed to represent a process at the organismic level, thereby confronting the experimentalist with a prospect of endless, unfathomable complexity. The cancer problem could not be reduced to a set of small, separable, easily studied pieces. Additionally frustrating for those steeped in microbial genetics was the strongly phenomenonologic vein of cancer research: the multiple aspects of tumors and cancer cells were being described in everincreasing detail, but these descriptions yielded only consequences, end results, and few insights into causal mechanisms. By cataloguing consequences, researchers were confined to the periphery of the cancer process. The engines working at the core remained obscure. By the early 1970s, we had one clear idea about where to look for cancer’s origins. A half century of work with Drosophila had shown that x-rays, which were known to induce human cancer, also created genetic lesions in the fly genome. This finding created an association between mutagenesis and carcinogenesis, although the connection was at best tenuous. For me, awareness and in-