Abstract:Objective To evaluate the influence of Unloader? One knee brace on the range of motion, pain, function, quality of daily life in the patients with medial knee osteoarthritis ( OA ). Methods A prospective, randomized and double-blind trial was performed on 36 patients with OA, who were divided into 3 groups, with 12 patients in each group. In group A, the patients were treated with the combination of Unloader? One knee brace and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ( NSAIDs ) ( meloxicam ). In group B, the patients were treated with Unloader? One knee brace alone. In group C, the patients was treated with NSAIDs ( meloxicam ) alone. All the patients visited the outpatient department every 3 weeks. The therapeutic effects were evaluated by means of the Lysholm knee scoring scale ( LKSS ), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score ( KOOS ), SF-12 physical component score, visual analogue scale ( VAS ) and Tegner activity level scale. The overall treatment time was 12 weeks. Results ( 1 ) At 12 weeks after the treatment, Lysholm score: 85.64 ± 4.74; KOOS score: 73.17 ± 8.29; pain: 70.33 ± 5.96;daily life: 77.08 ± 4.32; sports and entertainment: 81.67 ± 5.77; quality of life: 80.58 ± 5.76; SF-12 score: 19.08 ± 1.88;VAS pain score in the past 24 hours: 1.25 ± 0.754; Tegner active score: 7.45 ± 1.08 in group A, and all of the indexes got improved significantly ( P < 0.05 ). Lysholm score: 85.33 ± 4.68; KOOS score: 71.33 ± 10.63; pain: 68.83 ± 5.01; daily life: 75.92 ± 5.18; sports and entertainment: 80.00 ± 7.07; quality of life: 78.17 ± 6.63; SF-12 score: 18.83 ± 2.52; VAS pain score in the past 24 hours: 1.4 ± 0.809; Tegner active score: 7.55 ± 1.31 in group B, and all of the indexes got improved significantly ( P < 0.05 ). Lysholm score: 76.17 ± 5.557; KOOS score: 60.92 ± 7.75; pain: 57.67 ± 8.69; daily life: 68.17 ± 4.61; sports and entertainment: 70.00 ± 8.53; quality of life: 69.33 ± 8.24; SF-12 score: 14.18 ± 1.81; VAS pain score in the past 24 hours: 2.2 ± 0.669; Tegner active score: 4.36 ± 0.91 in group C, and all of the indexes got improved significantly ( P < 0.05 ). No significant differences were noticed between group B and group A ( P ≥ 0.05 ), while the therapeutic effects were much better than that in group C ( P < 0.05 ). ( 2 ) From the overall trend, the improvement of symptoms was achieved quickly in group C, but the final effects were worse than those in group A and B. The improvement of symptoms was achieved slowly in group B, but the final effects were better than those in group C. The improvement of symptoms was achieved quickly in group A. There were no significant differences between group A and group B ( P ≥ 0.05 ), while the final effects in group A were much better than those in group C. ( 3 ) Three weeks later, Lysholm score: 71.08 ± 7.63; KOOS score: 56.25 ± 12.22; pain: 41 ± 10.24; daily life: 55.5 ± 10.7; sports and entertainment: 57.08 ± 14.22; quality of life: 55.5 ± 10.7; SF-12 score: 10.92 ± 2.11, VAS pain score in the past 24 hours: 2.08 ± 1.08; Tegner active score: 3.67 ± 1.23 in group C, and the therapeutic effects were much better than those in group B ( P < 0.05 ), while no significant differences existed between group C and group A ( P ≥0.05 ). ( 4 ) Six weeks later, Lysholm score: 81.25 ± 8.95; KOOS score: 69.5 ± 11.33; pain: 62.5 ± 9.8; daily life: 69.5 ± 9.35; sports and entertainment: 72.92 ± 10.97; quality of life: 69.5 ± 9.35; SF-12 score: 16.58 ± 2.84; VAS pain score in the past 24 hours: 1.58 ± 0.79; Tegner active score: 6.58 ± 1.56 in group A, and the therapeutic effects were much better than those in group C ( P < 0.05 ). No significant differences were noticed when compared with group C 3 weeks earlier ( P ≥ 0.05 ), while there were significant differences when compared with group B ( P < 0.05 ). ( 5 ) Nine weeks later, Lysholm score: 85.08 ± 4.91; KOOS score: 71.17 ± 10.53; pain: 65.67 ± 7.33; daily life: 72.42 ± 6.1;sports and entertainment: 77.5 ± 7.54; quality of life: 72.42 ± 6.1; SF-12 score: 18.92 ± 2.07; VAS pain score in the past 24 hours: 1.46 ± 0.54; Tegner active score: 7.42 ± 0.9 in group A, and the therapeutic effects were much better than those in group C ( P < 0.05 ). No significant differences were noticed when compared with those at the 6th weeks in group C ( P ≥ 0.05 ), while there were no significant differences when compared with group B ( P ≥ 0.05 ). Conclusions ( 1 ) Better therapeutic effects can be achieved using Unloader? One knee brace in the treatment of medial knee OA. ( 2 ) The symptoms, pain, function and quality of daily life can be effectively improved by using the brace alone even though it takes a longer time relatively. ( 3 ) Pain can be relieved in a shorter time and the final effects are better by the combination of Unloader? One knee brace and NSAIDs, but no significant differences are found in the final effects when compared with that using the brace alone.

Knee braces and foot orthoses multimodal 3‐month treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis in a randomised crossover trial

Three-month efficacy of three knee braces in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis in a randomized crossover trial

Effect of a valgus brace on medial tibiofemoral joint contact force in knee osteoarthritis with varus malalignment: A within-participant cross-over randomised study with an uncontrolled observational longitudinal follow-up

Effectiveness of Different Orthoses on Joint Moments in Patients with Early Knee Osteoarthritis: Lateral Wedge Versus Valgus Knee Bracing

Do Laterally Wedged Insoles or Valgus Braces Unload the Medial Compartment of the Knee in Patients With Osteoarthritis?

Comparing the effects of lower limb orthoses on knee pain, function, quality of life, and knee joint alignment in people with medial knee osteoarthritis

Effects of tailored lateral wedge insoles on medial knee osteoarthritis based on biomechanical analysis: 12-week randomized controlled trial

The effect of bracing on varus gonarthrosis

Kinetic and kinematic changes with the use of valgus knee brace and lateral wedge insoles in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis

THE IMPACT OF A SENSOR BASED PLATFORM ON THE OUTCOME OF MEDIAL OFF-LOADER BRACING IN INDIVIDUALS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: A PILOT RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Effect of using knee valgus brace on pain and activity level over different time intervals among patients with medial knee OA: systematic review

Reduced knee joint loading with lateral and medial wedge insoles for management of knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Impact of a Semi-Rigid Knee Orthotic Intervention on Pain, Physical Activity, and Functional Capacity in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

Physical therapy and orthopaedic equipment-induced reduction in the biomechanical risk factors related to knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of bracing in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis management: protocol for a multicentre, primary care, randomised, parallel-group, superiority trial

Efficacy of arch contouring foot orthoses for midfoot osteoarthritis: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Research on Unloader? One knee brace in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis

Immediate and long-term efficacy of laterally-wedged insoles on persons with bilateral medial knee osteoarthritis during walking

Higher satisfaction and function scores in restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment with medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled trial

Effects Of Orthopaedic Insoles On Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis And Systematic Review

Moderators of Effects of Internet-Delivered Exercise and Pain Coping Skills Training for People With Knee Osteoarthritis: Exploratory Analysis of the IMPACT Randomized Controlled Trial