Apoptotic effect of CKD-602 (Camtobell) on oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.

Yong-Ju Ok,H. Myoung,Young-Kyun Kim,Jong-Ho Lee,Myung-Jin Kim,P. Yun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.05.001

IF: 5.972

2009-03-01

Oral Oncology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Phase II randomised trial of type I interferon inhibitor anifrolumab in patients with active lupus nephritis

David Jayne,Brad Rovin,Eduardo F Mysler,Richard A Furie,Frederic A Houssiau,Teodora Trasieva,Jacob Knagenhjelm,Erik Schwetje,Yen Lin Chia,Raj Tummala,Catharina Lindholm

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221478

Abstract:Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of the type I interferon receptor antibody, anifrolumab, in patients with active, biopsy-proven, Class III/IV lupus nephritis. Methods: This phase II double-blinded study randomised 147 patients (1:1:1) to receive monthly intravenous anifrolumab basic regimen (BR, 300 mg), intensified regimen (IR, 900 mg ×3, 300 mg thereafter) or placebo, alongside standard therapy (oral glucocorticoids, mycophenolate mofetil). The primary endpoint was change in baseline 24-hour urine protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR) at week (W) 52 for combined anifrolumab versus placebo groups. The secondary endpoint was complete renal response (CRR) at W52. Exploratory endpoints included more stringent CRR definitions and sustained glucocorticoid reductions (≤7.5 mg/day, W24-52). Safety was analysed descriptively. Results: Patients received anifrolumab BR (n=45), IR (n=51), or placebo (n=49). At W52, 24-hour UPCR improved by 69% and 70% for combined anifrolumab and placebo groups, respectively (geometric mean ratio=1.03; 95% CI 0.62 to 1.71; p=0.905). Serum concentrations were higher with anifrolumab IR versus anifrolumab BR, which provided suboptimal exposure. Numerically more patients treated with anifrolumab IR vs placebo attained CRR (45.5% vs 31.1%), CRR with UPCR ≤0.5 mg/mg (40.9% vs 26.7%), CRR with inactive urinary sediment (40.9% vs 13.3%) and sustained glucocorticoid reductions (55.6% vs 33.3%). Incidence of herpes zoster was higher with combined anifrolumab vs placebo (16.7% vs 8.2%). Incidence of serious adverse events was similar across groups. Conclusion: Although the primary endpoint was not met, anifrolumab IR was associated with numerical improvements over placebo across endpoints, including CRR, in patients with active lupus nephritis. Trial registration number: NCT02547922.
Type I interferon blockade with anifrolumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus modulates key immunopathological pathways in a gene expression and proteomic analysis of two phase 3 trials

Tina Baker,Hoda Sharifian,Paul J Newcombe,Patrick G Gavin,Mark N Lazarus,Madhu Ramaswamy,Wendy I White,Nicola Ferrari,Daniel Muthas,Raj Tummala,Eric F Morand,Richard Furie,Edward M Vital,Chris Chamberlain,Adam Platt,Hussein Al-Mossawi,Philip Z Brohawn,Eszter Csomor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-225445

IF: 27.973

2024-04-03

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract:Introduction Anifrolumab is a type I interferon (IFN) receptor 1 (IFNAR1) blocking antibody approved for treating patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Here, we investigated the immunomodulatory mechanisms of anifrolumab using longitudinal transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of the 52-week, randomised, phase 3 TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials. Methods Patients with moderate to severe SLE were enrolled in TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 and received intravenous anifrolumab or placebo alongside standard therapy. Whole-blood expression of 18 017 genes using genome-wide RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) (pooled TULIP; anifrolumab, n=244; placebo, n=258) and 184 plasma proteins using Olink and Simoa panels (TULIP-1; anifrolumab, n=124; placebo, n=132) were analysed. We compared treatment groups via gene set enrichment analysis using MetaBase pathway analysis, blood transcriptome modules, in silico deconvolution of RNA-seq and longitudinal linear mixed effect models for gene counts and protein levels. Results Compared with placebo, anifrolumab modulated >2000 genes by week 24, with overlapping results at week 52 and 41 proteins by week 52. IFNAR1 blockade with anifrolumab downregulated multiple type I and II IFN-induced gene modules/pathways and type III IFN-λ protein levels, and impacted apoptosis-associated and neutrophil extracellular trap-associated transcriptional pathways, innate cell activating chemokines and receptors, proinflammatory cytokines and B-cell activating cytokines. In silico deconvolution of RNA-seq data indicated an increase from baseline of mucosal-associated invariant and γδT cells and a decrease of monocytes following anifrolumab treatment. Discussion Type I IFN blockade with anifrolumab modulated multiple inflammatory pathways downstream of type I IFN signalling, including apoptotic, innate and adaptive mechanisms that play key roles in SLE immunopathogenesis.

rheumatology
MMP-9 (gelatinase B) mRNA is expressed during mouse neurogenesis and may be associated with vascularization.

R. Cañete Soler,Y. Gui,K. Linask,R. Muschel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-3806(95)00079-S

1995-08-28

Abstract:
Evaluation of anifrolumab safety in systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Zhihui Liu,Ruijuan Cheng,Yi Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.996662

IF: 7.3

2022-09-23

Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract:Objectives Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease, and type I interferon plays an important role in its pathogenesis. Anifrolumab is a new strategy for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. It could antagonize the activity of all type 1 interferons by binding with type I interferon receptor subunit 1. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety of anifrolumab in patients with moderate to severe SLE (excluding patients with active severe lupus nephritis or central nervous system lupus). Methods Four databases (Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science) were systematically searched from inception until December 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the safety of anifrolumab versus placebo in SLE patients. Then, the incidence of adverse events in each study was aggregated using meta-analysis. Results A total of 1160 SLE patients from four RCTs were included in the analysis. Serious adverse events were less common in the anifrolumab group than in the placebo group (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.98, p<0.03). The most common adverse events included upper respiratory tract infection (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.13-1.94, P=0.004), nasopharyngitis (RR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.25-2.20, P=0.0004), bronchitis (RR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.32-2.92, P=0.0009), and herpes zoster (RR: 3.40, 95% CI: 1.90-6.07, P<0.0001). Conclusion Anifrolumab is considered a well-tolerated option for the treatment of SLE patients with good safety. Systematic Review Registration https://inplasy.com , identifier 202230054.

immunology
Portrait of a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus for the prescription of the type I interferon inhibitor anifrolumab

T. M. Reshetnyak,E. A. Aseeva,A. A. Shumilova,N. Yu. Nikishina,S. Yu. Shkireeva,A. M. Lila

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2023-6-14-21

2023-12-16

Modern Rheumatology Journal

Abstract:In recent years the use of monoclonal antibodies that block activity of type I interferon (IFN) or its receptors has become the new approach in the pharmacotherapy of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Objective : to characterize patients with SLE treated with the type I IFN receptor inhibitor anifrolumab (AFM, Saphnelo®). Material and methods . The prospective 12-month study included 21 patients with SLE who met the 2012 SLICC criteria. Standard laboratory and immunological markers for SLE were examined in all patients. The SLEDAI-2K index was used to determine the activity of SLE and the CLASI index was used to determine the severity of the mucocutaneous syndrome. Organ damage was assessed using the SLICC/ACR Damage Index (DI). The LupusQol and FACIT-Fatigue questionnaires were used to analyze health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Results and discussion . Female patients prevailed in the study, female/male ratio – 17 (81%)/4 (19%), median age – 31 [27; 46] years, disease duration – 9 [6.0; 11.0] years. The majority of patients (86%) had moderate or high disease activity according to the SLEDAI-2K index. Among the clinical manifestations of SLE, skin and mucous membranes lesions predominated (81%). Non-erosive polyarthritis of varying severity was observed in 66% of cases. Serositis showed 24% of patients (pleurisy, pericarditis), 43% had hematological abnormalities (hemolytic anemia, leukopenia, lymphopenia) and 14% - urinary syndrome (daily proteinuria up to 0.5 g/l and/or urinary sediment – leukocytes/erythrocytes/cylinders up to 5 in the field of view in the absence of urinary tract infection). All patients had immunological disorders. 14% of them were diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and 43% with Sjögren's syndrome. All patients received hydroxychloroquine, 95% received glucocorticoids (GC) from 5 to 60 mg/day, 66% received immunosuppressants (cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, methotrexate). 33% of patients had anamnesis of treatment with biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (rituximab, belimumab, dual anti-B-cell therapy) and Janus kinase inhibitor baricitinib. All patients experienced a significant deterioration in HRQoL. Conclusion. The indications for prescribing AFM to 21 patients with SLE were: active SLE according to SLEDAI-2K and/or CLASI with predominant involvement of skin, its appendages and development of polyarthritis with immunological disorders, intolerance/ineffectiveness of previous standard therapy and inability to achieve low average daily doses of oral GCs. Other clinical manifestations in some patients were: serositis, mild hematological disorders (Coombs-positive anemia, leukopenia), urinary syndrome. AFM could be prescribed for a combination of SLE with secondary APS and Sjögren's syndrome as well as for a high DI SLICC.
POS0120 SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF SUBCUTANEOUS (S.C.) DOSE IANALUMAB (VAY736; ANTI-BAFFR Mab) ADMINISTERED MONTHLY OVER 28 WEEKS IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (SLE)

Josefina Cortés-Hernández,Stanislav Ignatenko,А В Гордиенко,Nancy Agmon‐Levin,Pongthorn Narongroeknawin,K. Romanowska -Prochnicka,Nan Shen,Hana Ciferská,Masanari Kodera,James Cheng‐Chung Wei,Piotr Leszczyński,Joung‐Liang Lan,Rafał Wojciechowski,Tünde Tarr,Еlena A. Vishneva,Y. H. Chen,Yuko Kaneko,Stephanie Finzel,Alberta Hoi,Masato Okada,Ajchara Koolvisoot,S. S. Lee,Lie Dai,Hiroshi Kaneko,B Rojkovich,Lingyun Sun,Е. Г. Зоткин,B. Magallares,Tapan K. Sengupta,C. Sips,Stuart Oliver

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2023-eular.3110

2023-01-01

Abstract:Background Ianalumab (VAY736) is a novel defucosylated, human IgG1 mAb targeting the receptor for B cell Activating Factor of TNF Family (BAFF-R), providing both enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity-mediated depletion of B cells and blockade of BAFF:BAFF-R signaling that drives B cell differentiation, proliferation and survival. Objectives Evaluate safety and efficacy of ianalumab in patients with active SLE. Methods Multi-center, randomised, parallel group, double-blind trial consisting of 2 separate, placebo-controlled treatment cohorts for ianalumab and for iscalimab (CFZ533; anti-CD40 mAb) randomised 1:1 between active:placebo. Patients (ianalumab cohort n= 67, iscalimab cohort n= 40) with ANA ≥1:80 and meeting ≥4/11 ACR 1997 SLE classification criteria, with SLEDAI-2K score ≥6 and BILAG-2004 ≥1 'A' or two 'B' scores that included activity in either mucocutaneous and/or musculoskeletal domains were enrolled from 19 Dec 2018 through 31 Jan 2022. Here we report interim analysis results for ianalumab treatment cohort (active n=34, placebo n=33) completing the 28-week blinded treatment period, which comprised of monthly s.c. injection of ianalumab 300 mg or placebo. Outcomes were measured at baseline (BL) and weeks (w) 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and 28. The primary w28 outcome was proportion of patients meeting composite endpoint requirements consisting of patients who both achieved SRI-4 and also tapered predniso(lo)ne ≤5 mg/d or ≤ BL dose, whichever was lower, by w16 and kept within that range to w28. Other outcomes included safety and tolerability, incidence of BILAG-2004 moderate or severe flares, proportion of patients achieving Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), change from BL in SLEDAI-2K and BILAG-2004, physician/patient global visual analog scale (VAS) assessments and laboratory markers of inflammation and immune activation. Post-w28 patients received open-label ianalumab for 20w, then safety follow up off treatment up to 2 years (y). Results Median age was 42y and 39y for ianalumab and placebo arms, respectively, with 8 males (ianalumab: 2, placebo: 6). BL median (range) values for ianalumab and placebo arms, respectively, were: SLEDAI-2K scores 10 (6-32) and 10 (4-18), and predniso(lo)ne 10.0 mg (0-30.0) and 10.0 mg (2.5-27.5). Proportion of patients treated with ianalumab or placebo, respectively, achieving SRI-4 at w28 (Figure 1) was 70.6% (n=24) vs. 24.2% (n=8), and also meeting composite endpoint (Figure 1 insert): 44.1% (n=15) vs. 9.1% (n=3). Ianalumab showed benefit vs placebo in other outcomes (Table 1) for incidence moderate or severe flare, time to moderate or severe flare, achieving w28 LLDAS, and serum levels of complement and autoantibodies. No drug-related SAEs were reported with ianalumab during blinded or subsequent 20w open-label treatment. There were 2 AE-related dropouts occurring during open-label treatment, one in ianalumab arm (morphoea) and one with placebo (worsening of SLE). Pandemic-related discontinuations included one from each arm during the blinded treatment period, and 2 occurring post-w28 in the ianalumab arm: one each in open label and during safety follow up. Conclusion Treatment of SLE with ianalumab was well tolerated and met the composite primary endpoint of SRI-4 response with sustained steroid reduction, with additional benefits seen across other study endpoints. These positive results support further evaluation of ianalumab in SLE. REFERENCES: NIL. Acknowledgements: NIL. Disclosure of Interests Josefina Cortés-Hernández: None declared, Stanislav Ignatenko: None declared, Alexander Gordienko: None declared, Nancy Agmon-Levin: None declared, Pongthorn Narongroeknawin Speakers bureau: Novartis (Speaker/Honoraria (includes speakers bureau, symposia, and expert witness)), Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Galapagos, Glaxo-Smith Kline, Novartis (Researcher), Katarzyna Romanowska -Prochnicka: None declared, Nan Shen: None declared, Hana Ciferská: None declared, Masanari Kodera: None declared, James Cheng-Chung Wei: None declared, Piotr Leszczynski Speakers bureau: AbbVie/Abbott, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, UCB ((includes speakers bureau, symposia, and expert witness)), Grant/research support from: AbbVie/Abbott, Novartis, Roche, UCB, Joung Liang Lan: None declared, Rafal Wojciechowski Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Novartis (Speaker/Honoraria (includes speakers bureau, symposia, and expert witness)), Tunde Tarr: None declared, Elena Vishneva: None declared, Yi-Hsing Chen: None declared, Yuko Kaneko Speakers bureau: Speaker/Honoraria (includes speakers bureau, symposia, and expert witness: AbbVie/Abbott, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, AYUMI Pharmaceutical K. K., Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Chug- Pharm, Chug-Pharm, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Tanabe Mitsubishi Pharma, UCB Japan, Consultant of: Advisor or Review Panel Member: AbbVie/Abbott, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, AYUMI Pharmaceutical K. K., Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Chug- Pharm, Chug-Pharm, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKlein (GSK), Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Tanabe Mitsubishi Pharma, UCB Japan, Stephanie Finzel Speakers bureau: AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, Galapagos, Novartis, UCB (Speaker/Honoraria (includes speakers bureau, symposia, and expert witness)), Consultant of: Amgen, Novartis, Novonordisk (Advisor or Review Panel Member), Alberta Hoi Speakers bureau: Sandoz, UCB, Janssen (Speaker/Honoraria (includes speakers bureau, symposia, and expert witness)), Consultant of: AbbVie/Abbott (Consultant, Professional service), AstraZeneca, Pfizer (Consultant), Janssen (Consultant, Sponsor of Australian Lupus Registry & Biobank), Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Merck Serono (Grant/Research Support), Masato Okada: None declared, Ajchara Koolvisoot: None declared, Shin-Seok Lee: None declared, Lie Dai: None declared, Hiroshi Kaneko: None declared, Bernadette Rojkovich: None declared, Lingyun Sun: None declared, Evgeniy Zotkin: None declared, Berta Magallares: None declared, Tirtha Sengupta Employee of: Novartis, Carole Sips Shareholder of: Novartis (Stock options or bond holdings in a for-profit corporation or self-directed pension plan), Employee of: Novartis, Stephen Oliver Shareholder of: Novartis (Stock options or bond holdings in a for-profit corporation or self-directed pension plan), Employee of: Novartis.
Anifrolumab treatment improves patient-reported quality of life and decreases disease activity and corticosteroid use in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A qualitative study in Denmark

Anne Troldborg,Lauren Remkus,Daniel Eek,Bent Deleuran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033241261746

IF: 2.858

2024-06-21

Lupus

Abstract:Lupus, Ahead of Print. Anifrolumab is a new therapeutic approach for individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) directed at blocking the type 1 interferon pathway. Despite the expanding body of literature on Anifrolumab, an essential aspect remains absent: the subjective patient experience of treatment effects and implications on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The present study aimed to fill this void by elucidating the nuanced perspectives of SLE patients receiving Anifrolumab treatment by conducting qualitative in-depth interviews (IDIs). SLE patients at Aarhus University Hospital who had received at least three infusions of Anifrolumab were approached for inclusion in the study, which comprised two main elements: (1) qualitative IDIs and (2) collection of patient data from electronic medical records (EMRs). The IDIs were semi-structured and based on a discussion guide that included open-ended and close-ended questions. Verbatim transcripts were coded and analysed using qualitative software to understand concepts important to patients and to understand patients' own experiences before and after Anifrolumab therapy. A clinical chart review was conducted using EMR data at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after Anifrolumab initiation. IDIs were completed with 14 patients, and EMR data was collected from 16 patients (treatment days range: 62-474). Of the 23 symptoms spontaneously reported by patients prior to Anifrolumab treatment, fatigue, joint pain, sun sensitivity, joint stiffness, skin rashes, and hair loss were the most common. Most symptoms improved, and none worsened during treatment. Patients reported significant impacts of disease on daily life before treatment: day-to-day activities, social life, emotional aspects, physical activity, concentration/memory, work/employment, and family/romantic relationships. Patients reported improvements in all aspects after treatment but were still impacted. From the EMR data, we observed a fall in disease activity after treatment initiation with a concomitant reduction in the use of corticosteroids. This study provides valuable insights into the subjective experiences of SLE patients treated with Anifrolumab, and the findings collectively contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the treatment's efficacy from the patients' perspective and its tangible effects on both subjective and objective parameters in SLE patients.

rheumatology
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Anifrolumab in Moderate-to-Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Ananya Reddy Cingireddy,Navya Ramini,Anirudh Reddy Cingireddy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.63966

2024-07-06

Cureus

Abstract:Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease, which poses significant challenges due to its chronic nature and complex clinical manifestations. For patients with moderate-to-severe SLE, anifrolumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets the type 1 interferon receptor (IFNAR), has emerged as a cutting-edge treatment option that can reduce disease activity, prevent organ damage from the illness or side effects resulting from medications, and enhance the quality of life for those living with SLE. Consequently, this drug has received approval from major regulatory agencies. Anifrolumab's safety, effectiveness, and long-term results are assessed in this systematic review using information from clinical trials, real-world research, and retrospective analysis. In particular, clinical investigations, such as the MUSE Phase II and TULIP Phase III trials, showed that anifrolumab significantly improved important outcomes compared to placebo, including the SLE Responder Index, major clinical response, and disease activity ratings. During extended use, anifrolumab demonstrated significant sustained efficacy and a tolerable safety profile, with controllable side events mostly associated with viral infections. Moreover, subgroup analyses, demonstrating that Asian patients and individuals with a strong interferon gene profile are particularly responsive to anifrolumab, underscore the importance of customized treatment methods. Anifrolumab's safety and effectiveness were further validated by real-world data, particularly in patients who reached the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), where the drug decreased glucocorticoid consumption and disease activity. Overall, anifrolumab shows great promise as a treatment for moderate-to-severe SLE, providing significant efficacy together with a manageable safety profile. To fully explore its therapeutic potential and optimize therapy approaches for the management of SLE, further research is necessary, especially in lupus nephritis and other disease subsets.
The Chloroplast DnaJ Homolog CDJ 1 of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Is Part of a Multichaperone Complex Containing HSP 70 B , CGE 1 , and HSP 90 C Author ( s ) :

Felix Willmund,Karolin V. Dorn,Miriam Schulz-Raffelt,M. Schroda

Abstract:
Clinical Trials of Interferon Inhibitors in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Preliminary Real-World Efficacy of Anifrolumab

Samuel Díaz-Planellas,Dimitrios Katsifis-Nezis,Antonis Fanouriakis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.260624.cto

2024-06-30

Abstract:Approval of anifrolumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 2021 marked the success of a long quest to target the interferon system, in a disease wherein the latter has long been considered to play a pivotal role. Prior to anifrolumab, a number of agents had been tested in early phase clinical trials in patients with SLE, with equivocal results. Following its approval and marketing in several countries, the first reports regarding efficacy and safety in real-life clinical settings have been published, which suggest remarkable efficacy in skin manifestations of the disease, even after prior failure to multiple immunosuppressive therapies. In this report, we provide a short overview of IFN inhibitors that have been used in clinical trials of SLE, with a focus on anifrolumab; we also review all available evidence to date regarding its real-world efficacy and safety.
Necrotic enteritis of unknown aetiology in young beef calves at pasture

C. Penny,P. Scott,N. Watt,A. Greig

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/VR.134.12.296

1994-03-19

Abstract:An enteric disease has occurred for four consecutive years (1989 to 1992) in a spring-calving beef suckler herd in east central Scotland affecting seven- to 12-week-old beef calves. The affected animals remained pyrexic (40 to 42 degrees C) with an acute enteritis which progressed in some cases to severe mucohaemorrhagic colitis. Despite intensive antibiotic and fluid therapy 25 per cent of the affected calves died after five to 10 days of illness. Post mortem examination revealed ulceration and necrosis of the mucosa of the abomasum and small and large intestine. Haematological examinations revealed a severe, non-regenerative neutropenia. Histopathological examination of gut and associated lymphoid tissue revealed lesions similar to those described in bovine viral diarrhoea/mucosal disease (BVD/MD) infection but detailed investigations failed to reveal evidence of active BVD virus infection in the herd. No aetiological agent has been found in association with this disease, for which the term necrotic enteritis is proposed.
Use of Anifrolumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus, and Other Autoimmune Dermatoses

D Martín-Torregrosa,M Mansilla-Polo,D Morgado-Carrasco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2024.05.024

2024-07-05

Abstract:Anifrolumab is an inhibitor of the type I interferon receptor subunit 1 (IFNAR1) recently approved for the management of moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In 2 clinical trials, it has proven effective to treat cutaneous signs. Although anifrolumab has not been indicated for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), multiple cases and case series (20 publications with a total of 78 patients) have shown good and rapid responses with this drug, both in subacute CLE and discoid lupus erythematosus, as well as in lupus panniculitis and perniosis. Two case reports of dermatomyositis have also experienced clinical improvement with anifrolumab. Clinical trials of this drug are ongoing for subacute CLE and discoid lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and progressive vitiligo. Its most common adverse effects are respiratory infections and herpes zoster. Anifrolumab may be a well-tolerated alternative in the management of CLE.
Physiology‐based pharmacokinetic model with relative transcriptomics to evaluate tissue distribution and receptor occupancy of anifrolumab

Pradeep Sharma,David W. Boulton,Lynn N. Bertagnolli,Weifeng Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.13245

2024-10-04

CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology

Abstract:Type I interferons contribute to the pathogenesis of several autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis, cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and myositis. Anifrolumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to subunit 1 of the type I interferon receptor (IFNAR1). Results of phase IIb and phase III trials led to the approval of intravenous anifrolumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) alongside standard therapy in patients with moderate‐to‐severe SLE. Here, we built a population physiology‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of anifrolumab by utilizing the physiochemical properties of anifrolumab, binding kinetics to the Fc gamma neonatal receptor, and target‐mediated drug disposition properties. A novel relative transcriptomics approach was employed to determine IFNAR1 expression in tissues (blood, skin, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and muscle) using mRNA abundances from bioinformatic databases. The IFNAR1 expression and PBPK model were validated by testing their ability to predict clinical pharmacokinetics over a large dose range from different clinical scenarios after subcutaneous and intravenous anifrolumab dosing. The validated PBPK model predicted high unbound local concentrations of anifrolumab in blood, skin, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and muscle, which exceeded its IFNAR1 dissociation equilibrium constant values. The model also predicted high IFNAR1 occupancy with subcutaneous and intravenous anifrolumab dosing. The model predicted more sustained IFNAR1 occupancy ≥90% with subcutaneous anifrolumab 120 mg once‐weekly dosing vs. intravenous 300 mg Q4W dosing. The results informed the dosing of phase III studies of anifrolumab in new indications and present a novel approach to PBPK modeling coupled with relative transcriptomics in simulating pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

pharmacology & pharmacy
Finding the Role of Anifrolumab in the New Paradigm of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment

Romina Estefanía Nieto,Graciela S. Alarcón,Laurent Arnaud,Guillermo Javier Pons-Estel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-0900

2024-11-02

The Journal of Rheumatology

Abstract:The article by Tani et al, "Anifrolumab in Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Real-World, Multicenter Study,"1 evaluates the efficacy of anifrolumab (ANI) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who failed to respond to other treatments, including biologics. There are many unmet needs in the treatment of SLE. Despite recent advances, remission and low disease activity (LDA) rates remain suboptimal; therefore, some patients with SLE are at high risk of developing endstage renal disease, organ damage, drug-related toxicities—particularly related to the prolonged use of glucocorticoids (GCs)—and premature mortality.2-4 The introduction of biologics (belimumab and ANI) in the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for the management of nonrenal SLE5 challenges the rheumatologic community to adopt a paradigm shift in how they approach treatment. Also, the management of lupus nephritis (LN) has witnessed important advances with the approval of belimumab and voclosporin, a new calcineurin inhibitor. Consequently, there is a gradual transition from the traditional induction-maintenance regimen to the early use of combination therapies for LN, including immunosuppressants and biologics for patients with moderate or even mild disease.5 However, tools that would allow us to make better therapeutic decisions based on precision medicine without risk of overtreatment, which exposes patients to greater risks and higher costs without sufficient clinical benefit, are still lacking. Other unanswered questions remain: What is the optimal profile of patients who require combination therapy from the outset? Which patients will develop flares? Can we foresee treatment refractoriness? Precise indicators for using combinations of immunosuppressants are still unavailable. Other important points to consider are the differences in access and costs of these treatments, which introduce inequities, particularly in some low- and middle-income countries. We wonder if we will be able to treat our patients adequately worldwide. Currently, due to the ... Address correspondence to Dr. G.J. Pons-Estel, Centro Regional de Enfermedades Autoinmunes y Reumáticas, Grupo Oroño, Bv. Oroño 740, CP 2000, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina. Email: gponsestel{at}yahoo.com.

rheumatology
Interferon-targeted therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: Is this an alternative to targeting B and T cells?

K C Kalunian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203316652495

IF: 2.858

2016-08-05

Lupus

Abstract:Clinical trials of investigational agents in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have focused on targeting dysregulated B and T cells; however, recent translational research findings of the importance of the dysregulation of the innate immune system in SLE have led to clinical trials that target interferon. Three biologics that target type I interferons have been tested for their efficacy and safety in active SLE patients; these phase II trials have tested the hypothesis that down-regulation of interferon-regulated gene expression (the interferon signature) lessen the clinical burden of SLE. Rontalizumab, an anti-interferon-α monoclonal antibody, was studied in patients who had discontinued immunosuppressants. This study failed to show efficacy as assessed by both two outcome assessments; however, in low interferon signature patients, response was higher and corticosteroid usage was less in rontalizumab-treated patients. Sifalimumab, another anti-interferon-α monoclonal antibody, was studied in patients who remained on standard of care therapy. This study showed significantly better efficacy in patients treated with two sifalimumab dosages; significant differences were seen in the high interferon signature group. In a similar design and in a similar population as the sifalimumab study, anifrolumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to a type I interferon receptor, was studied in patients who remained on standard of care therapy. In this study, one dosage group demonstrated efficacy and statistically significant effects were achieved in both tested dosage groups with secondary end points. Oral corticosteroid reduction to ≤7.5 mg daily was achieved in one of the tested dosage groups and organ-specific outcomes were significantly improved in that same group. For all studies, no significant differences in serious adverse effects were seen; although, herpes zoster infections were increased in sifalimumab- and anifrolumab-treated patients and influenza rates were increased in anifrolumab-treated patients. Anifrolumab is currently in pivotal phase III studies. Data appear to support the concept that targeting type I interferon in SLE patients associates with clinical efficacy and safety. Further data are forthcoming from ongoing phase III clinical trials of anifrolumab. Other drug development efforts should be considered that target plasmacytoid dendritic cells and toll like receptors given the effects these components have on interferon production.

rheumatology
Dangers of Herpesvirus Infection in SLE Patients Under Anifrolumab Treatment: Case Reports and Clinical Implications

Mads Lamm Larsen,Morten Kelder Skouboe,Trine Hyrup Mogensen,Alex Lund Laursen,Bent Deleuran,Anne Troldborg,Mads Nyhuus Bendix Rasch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.944505

2024-09-09

Abstract:BACKGROUND Anifrolumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the type 1 interferon (IFN-I) signaling pathway, holds promise as a therapeutic intervention for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, its use is associated with an increased risk of infections, particularly viral infections like herpes zoster (HZ). Results from the clinical trials on anifrolumab show yearly rates of upper respiratory tract infections of 34% and HZ of 6.1%. An increased frequency of other specific viral infections, including herpes simplex virus (HSV), was not reported. CASE REPORT Here, we present 2 cases of patients with SLE treated with anifrolumab, both experiencing severe adverse reactions in the form of disseminated herpesvirus infections, specifically disseminated HSV-2 and varicella zoster virus (VZV, HZ encephalitis). To the best of our knowledge, no previous reports of severe disseminated HSV-2 or HZ have been published in anifrolumab-treated patients. The patient in case 1 experienced a primary HSV-2 infection following anifrolumab treatment, potentially explaining the severity of the infection. The patient in case 2 had a history of previous HZ skin infections, which may have increased her risk of disseminated infection. Both patients recovered from the infections with minor sequelae, but they still require prophylactic antiviral treatment. These cases highlight the critical role of IFN-I immunity in protecting against herpesvirus infections. CONCLUSIONS Thorough risk assessment before anifrolumab initiation, considering the patient's viral infection history, vaccination status, and potential exposure risks, is essential. Administration of recombinant zoster vaccine before anifrolumab therapy may benefit susceptible individuals.
Belimumab or anifrolumab for systemic lupus erythematosus? A risk-benefit assessment

Kyriakos A Kirou,Maria Dall Era,Cynthia Aranow,Hans-Joachim Anders

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.980079

2022-08-31

Abstract:Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) currently employs agents with relatively unselective immunosuppressive properties. However, two target-specific biological drugs have been approved: belimumab (anti-B-cell-activating factor/BAFF) and anifrolumab (anti-interferon alpha receptor-1/IFNAR1). Here, we performed a comparative risk-benefit assessment for both drugs based on the role of BAFF and IFNAR1 in host defense and the pathogenesis of SLE and by considering the available data on safety and efficacy. Due to differences in target expression sites, anti-IFNAR1, but not anti-BAFF, might elicit organ-specific effects, consistent with clinical efficacy data. The IFNAR1 is specifically involved in innate and adaptive antiviral immunity in most cells of the body. Consistent with this observation, the available safety data obtained from patients negatively selected for LN and neuropsychiatric SLE, primary immunodeficiencies, splenectomy and chronic HIV, HBV, HCV infections suggest an increased risk for some viral infections such as varicella zoster and perhaps influenza. In contrast, BAFF is mainly involved in adaptive immune responses in lymphoid tissues, thus anti-BAFF therapy modulates SLE activity and prevents SLE flares without interfering with local innate host defense mechanisms and should only marginally affect immune memory to previous pathogen exposures consistent with the available safety data from SLE patients without chronic HIV, HBV or HCV infections. When using belimumab and anifrolumab, careful patient stratification and specific precautions may minimize risks and maximize beneficial treatment effects for patients with SLE.
Lenzilumab in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (LIVE-AIR): a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Zelalem Temesgen,Charles D Burger,Jason Baker,Christopher Polk,Claudia R Libertin,Colleen F Kelley,Vincent C Marconi,Robert Orenstein,Victoria M Catterson,William S Aronstein,Cameron Durrant,Dale Chappell,Omar Ahmed,Gabrielle Chappell,Andrew D Badley,LIVE-AIR Study Group,Meghan Lewis,Linda Sher,Michael Bowdish,Noah Wald-Dickler,Subarna Biswas,Lydia Lam,Khang Vo,Roy Poblete,May M Lee,Douglass Hutcheon,Roberto Patron,John Gharbin,Caitlin Moran,Sheetal Kandiah,Valeria Cantos,Paulina Rebolledo,Carlos Del Rio,Jeffrey Lennox,Carmen Polito,Anandi Sheth,Anup Patel,Homero Paniagua,Seife Yohannes,Alpesh Amin,Richard Lee,Miki Watanabe,Lanny Hsieh,Martin Cearras,Amay Parikh,Jason Sniffen,Wilfred Onyia,Michael Boger,Lisa Davidson,Kiran Gajurel,Michael Leonard,Lewis McCurdy,Nestor Quezada,Mindy Sampson,Zainab Shahid,Stephanie Strollo,David Weinrib,Sara Zulfigar,Cheryl McDonald,John Hollingsworth,John Burk,Joshua Berg,Daniel Barbaro,Andrew Miller,Lakshmi Sambathkumar,Stuart McDonald,Obinna Okoye,Juan Pulido,Jennifer Fulton,William Gill,Richard Zuckerman,Lionel Lewis,Chaitanya Mandapakala,Matthew Robinson,Brian Metzger,Maqsood Alam,Chrisoula Politis,Anne Frosch,Linh Ngo,Fernando Carvalho Neuenschwander,EstevÃo Figueiredo,Gualter CanÇado,Gustavo Araujo,Lucas GuimarÃes,Ricardo Diaz,Natalia Bacellar,Celso Silva,Paulo Ferreira,Marina Andrade Lima,Caroline Uber Ghisi,Camila Anton,Ricardo Albaneze,Daniel Wagner de Castro Lima Santos,Ana Caroline Iglessias,Marianna Lago,Paula Pietrobom,Maysa Alves,Juvencio José Duailibe Furtado,Leopoldo Trevelin,Valeria Telles,Francini Correa,Fabiano Ramos,Marina de A R Da Silva,Rebeca C Lacerda Garcia,Ana Elizabeth G Maldonado,Ana Carolina M Beheregaray,Ana Maria T Ortiz,Kleber Luz,Eveline Pipolo Milan,Janine Soares de Castro,Matheus José Barbosa Moreira,Renata Bezerra Onofre,TÁcito do Nascimento JÁcome,Victor Barreto Garcia,Victor Matheus Rolim de Souzafrom,Felipe Dal Pizzol,Cristiane Ritter,Marcelo B Vinhas,Adilson Joaquim Westheimer Cavalcante,Julia Minghini,Loni Dorigo,Marina Salgado Miranda,Martti Anton Antila,Rebeca Brugnolli,Henrikki Antila

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00494-X

Abstract:Background: The pathophysiology of COVID-19 includes immune-mediated hyperinflammation, which could potentially lead to respiratory failure and death. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is among cytokines that contribute to the inflammatory processes. Lenzilumab, a GM-CSF neutralising monoclonal antibody, was investigated in the LIVE-AIR trial to assess its efficacy and safety in treating COVID-19 beyond available treatments. Methods: In LIVE-AIR, a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, hospitalised adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation were recruited from 29 sites in the USA and Brazil and were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive three intravenous doses of lenzilumab (600 mg per dose) or placebo delivered 8 h apart. All patients received standard supportive care, including the use of remdesivir and corticosteroids. Patients were stratified at randomisation by age and disease severity. The primary endpoint was survival without invasive mechanical ventilation to day 28 in the modified intention-to-treat population (mITT), comprising all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study drug under the documented supervision of the principal investigator or sub-investigator. Adverse events were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04351152, and is completed. Findings: Patients were enrolled from May 5, 2020, until Jan 27, 2021. 528 patients were screened, of whom 520 were randomly assigned and included in the intention-to-treat population. 479 of these patients (n=236, lenzilumab; n=243, placebo) were included in the mITT analysis for the primary outcome. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. 311 (65%) participants were males, mean age was 61 (SD 14) years at baseline, and median C-reactive protein concentration was 79 (IQR 41-137) mg/L. Steroids were administered to 449 (94%) patients and remdesivir to 347 (72%) patients; 331 (69%) patients received both treatments. Survival without invasive mechanical ventilation to day 28 was achieved in 198 (84%; 95% CI 79-89) participants in the lenzilumab group and in 190 (78%; 72-83) patients in the placebo group, and the likelihood of survival was greater with lenzilumab than placebo (hazard ratio 1·54; 95% CI 1·02-2·32; p=0·040). 68 (27%) of 255 patients in the lenzilumab group and 84 (33%) of 257 patients in the placebo group experienced at least one adverse event that was at least grade 3 in severity based on CTCAE criteria. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or higher were related to respiratory disorders (26%) and cardiac disorders (6%) and none led to death. Interpretation: Lenzilumab significantly improved survival without invasive mechanical ventilation in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, with a safety profile similar to that of placebo. The added value of lenzilumab beyond other immunomodulators used to treat COVID-19 alongside steroids remains unknown. Funding: Humanigen.
Targeting Interferon Signalling in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Lessons Learned

Sarah A. Jones,Eric F. Morand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02043-2

2024-05-30

Drugs

Abstract:The development of new medicines for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has not addressed unmet clinical need, with only three drugs receiving regulatory approval for SLE in the last 60 years, one of which was specifically licensed for lupus nephritis. In the last 20 years it has become clear that activation of type 1 interferons (IFN) is reproducibly detected in the majority of SLE patients, and the actions of IFN in the immune system and on target tissues is consistent with a pathogenic role in SLE. These findings led to considerable drug discovery activity, first with agents directly targeting IFN family cytokines, with results that were encouraging but underwhelming. In contrast, targeting the type I IFN receptor with the monoclonal antibody anifrolumab, thereby blocking all IFN family members, was effective in a phase II clinical trial. This led to a pair of phase III trials, one of which was negative and the other positive, reflecting the difficulty of obtaining outcomes from trials in this complex disease. Nonetheless, the balance of evidence resulted in approval of anifrolumab in multiple jurisdictions from 2021 onwards. Multiple approaches to targeting the type 1 IFN pathway have subsequently had positive phase II clinical trials, including antibodies targeting cells that produce IFN, and small molecules targeting the receptor kinase TYK2, required for IFN signalling. Despite multiple hurdles, it is clear that IFN targeting in SLE is here to stay. The story of IFN-targeting therapy in SLE has lessons for drug development overall in this disease.

pharmacology & pharmacy,toxicology
Safety and efficacy of biological agents in the treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

Justin Chan,Giles D Walters,Prianka Puri,Simon H Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-023-00358-3

2023-10-09

Abstract:Background: To determine the safety and efficacy of biological agents used in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in adults. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Data sources: MEDLINE (through Pubmed), EMBASE, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov, Australianclinicaltrials.gov.au, ANZCTR.org.au and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for studies published from 20 May 2021 and 15 years prior. A grey literature search was performed and completed on 31 May 2021. Study criteria: Phase II, III or quasi randomised controlled trials, studies with only cerebral or cutaneous lupus were excluded. Data extraction: Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted, reviewed data for accuracy, and used the Cochrane tool to assess risk of bias. Results: Forty-four studies were identified, consisting of 15 groups of drugs and 25 different biological agents, totalling 16,889 patients. The main outcomes assessed included Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI), BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) and combined combined/partial renal remission (CRR/PRR). Four groups of biologics were found to improve outcomes. Anti-interferons: Anifrolumab increased BICLA response and SRI 5 to 8, decreased prednisone dosages, with increased herpes zoster infections, but fewer serious adverse events. Sifalimumab improved SRI but also increased herpes zoster infections. Anti BAFF/BLyS and/or APRIL: Belimumab consistently improved SRI 4, decreased prednisone dosages, increased combined CRR/PRR, and had no adverse safety outcomes. Tabalumab increased SRI 5 at 52 weeks with no steroid sparing effect but was associated with increased infusion related adverse events. Telitacicept improved SRI 4 at 52 weeks, with no increased adverse events, though data was rather sparse. Anti CD-20 monoclonal antibody, Obinutuzumab increased combined CRR/PRR at 1 and 2 years. Anti IL12/23 monoclonal antibody, Ustekinumab, increased SRI 4 to 6, but not BICLA at 24 weeks, with no concerning safety outcomes. Conclusion: Multiple biologic agents are shown in high quality studies to have a significant therapeutic impact on outcomes in SLE.

Apoptotic effect of CKD-602 (Camtobell) on oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.

Phase II randomised trial of type I interferon inhibitor anifrolumab in patients with active lupus nephritis

Type I interferon blockade with anifrolumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus modulates key immunopathological pathways in a gene expression and proteomic analysis of two phase 3 trials

MMP-9 (gelatinase B) mRNA is expressed during mouse neurogenesis and may be associated with vascularization.

Evaluation of anifrolumab safety in systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Portrait of a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus for the prescription of the type I interferon inhibitor anifrolumab

POS0120 SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF SUBCUTANEOUS (S.C.) DOSE IANALUMAB (VAY736; ANTI-BAFFR Mab) ADMINISTERED MONTHLY OVER 28 WEEKS IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (SLE)

Anifrolumab treatment improves patient-reported quality of life and decreases disease activity and corticosteroid use in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A qualitative study in Denmark

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Anifrolumab in Moderate-to-Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The Chloroplast DnaJ Homolog CDJ 1 of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Is Part of a Multichaperone Complex Containing HSP 70 B , CGE 1 , and HSP 90 C Author ( s ) :

Clinical Trials of Interferon Inhibitors in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Preliminary Real-World Efficacy of Anifrolumab

Necrotic enteritis of unknown aetiology in young beef calves at pasture

Use of Anifrolumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus, and Other Autoimmune Dermatoses

Physiology‐based pharmacokinetic model with relative transcriptomics to evaluate tissue distribution and receptor occupancy of anifrolumab

Finding the Role of Anifrolumab in the New Paradigm of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment

Interferon-targeted therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: Is this an alternative to targeting B and T cells?

Dangers of Herpesvirus Infection in SLE Patients Under Anifrolumab Treatment: Case Reports and Clinical Implications

Belimumab or anifrolumab for systemic lupus erythematosus? A risk-benefit assessment

Lenzilumab in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (LIVE-AIR): a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Targeting Interferon Signalling in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Lessons Learned

Safety and efficacy of biological agents in the treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)