Ascitic fluid culture technique

P. Edelstein,B. Runyon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840080456
IF: 17.298
1988-07-01
Hepatology
Abstract:The Pugh score is a simple method to assess the severity of liver disease, enjoys wide recognition and has been shown to be a valid predictor of death. Poynard et al. suggest that serum fibronectin and age add significant prognostic value to Pugh score. In their data, the Pugh score alone did unusually poorly as a discriminator of those who died and of those who did not [at the maximum discrimination point, the sensitivity of the test was 80% but its specificity was only 40% (60% false positives)]. It would seem, then, that all the discriminating power in the later models shown by Poynard et al. was carried by age and fibronectin; but again, the maximum discriminating point of the best model was not as good (75%) as the one reached in our study (1) with the Pugh score alone (80%). This could indicate either (i) that there may be a problem in the measurement of the Pugh components such as a lack of standardization, leading to large measurement errors, or (ii) that the Pugh score is not a useful prognostic indicator in a population of alcoholic cirrhotics such as the one included in the Poynard study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?