Assessing the Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Stationary Energy Storage for Electricity Grid Services

Christopher Jones,Paul Gilbert,Laurence Stamford
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06231
2020-01-07
Abstract:This paper presents a life cycle assessment for three stationary energy storage systems (ESS): lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery, vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB), and liquid air energy storage (LAES). The global warming potential (GWP) is assessed in relation to uncertainties in usage of the storage, use-phase energy input, cell replacement, and round-trip efficiency parameters. Relative climate change mitigation potential in comparison with equivalent diesel electric and natural gas generation is discussed, as is the effect of recycling at end of life. With variations in input electricity source, recycling, and efficiency, the life cycle global warming potential for LFP ranges from 185 to 440 kg CO2 eq/MWh, for VRFB from 121 to 443 kg CO2 eq/MWh, and for LAES from 48 to 203 kg CO2 eq/MWh. In all cases, there are climate change mitigation benefits compared to fossil fuel alternatives. Use of renewable energy for charging and operation, ease of component recycling/reuse, and reduced parts replacement is shown to reduce GWP. The climate change mitigation potential of ESS for electricity grid operation is further enhanced by increasing use of the storage assets. Recycling of ESS is shown to reduce terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, and particulate matter impacts. Reduced ozone depletion potential for VRFB and LFP can be achieved by reducing nafion and PVDF components, respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?