An Evolutionary Theory of Female Physical Attractiveness

Devendrá Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24839/1092-0803.EYE10.3.18
Abstract:Physical attractiveness, despite sustained exhortations that beauty is only skin deep and that one should not judge the book by its cover, significantly impacts practically every aspect of interpersonal relationships. Physically attractive women are admired and handsomely paid to be models, glamorized as movie actresses, and blamed for being greatly responsible for widespread body dissatisfaction and eating disorders in young women. The argument that fairy tales and the media link physical beauty to positive attributes does not explain why children as young as 14 hours old gaze at adults judged to have attractive female faces longer than those who have unattractive faces. What is the basis for such allure and power of attractiveness? To understand the nature of physical attractiveness, the first step is to identify features that a majority of people find attractive and to search for a basis of consensus. Evolutionary psychologists use such an approach. Simply stated, evolutionary theorists argue that physical attractiveness reliably conveys biological information about a person's genetic quality, health, and reproductive potential. Being able to judge these attributes reliably would have enabled people in Stone Age environments to select healthy mates and be reproductively successful, as healthy mates would be better providers and protractors for the family unit. The problem is that the reproductive potential, capability, and genetic resistance to disease cannot be directly observed. Therefore, the selection process has shaped mental mechanisms to attend to those bodily features that are reliable indicators of health and fertility, and such features are judged to be desirable and attractive. Although people are not consciously aware of such a link, therein lies the power of physical attractiveness. Many evolution-inspired researchers have started to explore whether the facial features that are judged to be attractive, such as full lips, small chin, symmetry of bilateral facial features, and so forth, are indicators of sex hormone, reproductive potential, and healthiness (e.g., Johnston, Hagel, Franklin, Fink, & Grammer, 2001). Physical attractiveness depends on both facial and bodily features, but strangely, all the detailed analysis of what constitutes attractiveness and its link to genetic quality is restricted to faces. The attractiveness of the body, in spite of clear age-related change (e.g., prepubertal, postpubertal, and menopausal) is solely defined by body weight; skinny women are more
What problem does this paper attempt to address?