Abstract:Pure-tone audiometry—the process of estimating a person's hearing threshold from “audible” and “inaudible” responses to tones of varying frequency and intensity—is the basis for diagnosing and quantifying hearing loss. By taking a probabilistic modeling approach, both optimal tone selection (in terms of expected information gain) and hearing threshold estimation can be derived through Bayesian inference methods. The performance of probabilistic model-based audiometry methods is directly linked to the quality of the underlying model. In recent years, Gaussian process (GP) models have been shown to provide good results in this context. We present methods to improve the efficiency of GP-based audiometry procedures by improving the underlying model. Instead of a single GP, we propose to use a GP mixture model that can be conditioned on side-information about the subject. The underlying idea is that one can typically distinguish between different types of hearing thresholds, enabling a mixture model to better capture the statistical properties of hearing thresholds among a population. Instead of modeling all hearing thresholds by a single GP, a mixture model allows specific types of hearing thresholds to be modeled by independent GP models. Moreover, the mixing coefficients can be conditioned on side-information such as age and gender, capturing the correlations between age, gender, and hearing threshold. We show how a GP mixture model can be optimized for a specific target population by learning the parameters from a data set containing annotated audiograms. We also derive an optimal tone selection method based on greedy information gain maximization, as well as hearing threshold estimation through Bayesian inference. The proposed models are fitted to a data set containing roughly 176 thousand annotated audiograms collected in the Nordic countries. We compare the predictive accuracies of optimized mixture models of varying sizes with that of an optimized single-GP model. The usefulness of the optimized models is tested in audiometry simulations. Simulation results indicate that an optimized GP mixture model can significantly outperform an optimized single-GP model in terms of predictive accuracy, and leads to significant increases the efficiency of the resulting Bayesian audiometry procedure.

Bayesian analysis of paired-comparison sound quality ratings

Pair-wise Comparison Experiment on Subjective Annoyance Rating of Noise Samples with Different Frequency Spectrums but Same A-weighted Level

Sound quality preference modeling usiung a nested artificial neural network architecture

Paired Comparisons Modeling using t-Distribution with Bayesian Analysis

An Optimization Study on Listening Experiments to Improve the Comparability of Annoyance Ratings of Noise Samples from Different Experimental Sample Sets

On Extending the Bradley-Terry Model to Accommodate Ties in Paired Comparison Experiments

A practical guide and software for analysing pairwise comparison experiments

ROC Analysis for Paired Comparison Data

A Statistical Method for the Analysis of Speech Intelligibility Tests

Detecting Heterogeneity of Intervention Effects in Comparative Judgments

Statistical inference for pairwise comparison models

A Comparative Review of Methods for Comparing Means Using Partially Paired Data

A Bayesian Active Learning Approach to Comparative Judgement

Analysis of data from the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) using Bayesian Item Response Theory

Bayesian Pure-Tone Audiometry Through Active Learning Under Informed Priors

Strategy for Boosting Pair Comparison and Improving Quality Assessment Accuracy

Instrumental Quality Predictions and Analysis of Auditory Cues for Algorithms in Modern Headphone Technology

Comparative analysis of the existence and uniqueness conditions of parameter estimation in paired comparison models

Ties in Paired-Comparison Experiments: A Generalization of the Bradley-Terry Model

A Bayesian Bradley-Terry model to compare multiple ML algorithms on multiple data sets

Models for Paired Comparison Data: A Review with Emphasis on Dependent Data