Pharmacogenomic study of gemcitabine on the safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (GENESECT study): Analysis of a subpopulation.
Takashi Yokokawa,Daiki Tsuji,Masahiro Hatori,Kenichi Suzuki,Kazuyoshi Kawakami,Masahiko Nakao,Takuya Yano,Yuichiro Arakawa,Keisuke Matsuo,Yasukata Ohashi,Masato Ozaka,Naoki Sasahira,Yasuhiko Sakata,Yuki Kogure,Shinya Tamaki,Atsushi Wada,Yusuke Taki,Hiroshi Ishii,Kunihiko Itoh,Masakazu Yamaguchi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.3_suppl.651
IF: 45.3
2024-01-23
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:651 Background: In the GENESECT study, we examined the relationships between gemcitabine (GEM) metabolism-related germline genetic polymorphisms (GPs) and treatment efficacy and safety. However, no significant GPs were found because approximately 70% of the patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel, which has a different metabolic process than GEM. In the present study, a subanalysis including only GEM monotherapy patients was performed. Methods: Of the 159 patients analyzed in the GENESECT study, only the GEM monotherapy patients were selected. The endpoints were the carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response (reduction ≥50% from the pretreatment level at 8 weeks), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in relation to GPs from the viewpoint of efficacy, and neutropenia ≥Grade 3 and thrombocytopenia ≥Grade 3 in relation to GPs from the viewpoint of safety. The analyzed genes included those encoding GEM transporters and metabolic enzymes ( SLC29A1, ABCC5, CDA, DCK, RRM1/2), and a tumor cell proliferation enzyme ( COX-2). Statistical analysis included univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The significance level was set to 5%. Results: Data of 50 patients were analyzed. AA genotype in ABCC5 1146A>G (rs7636910) was associated with a significantly higher percentage of CA19-9 responses compared to AG/GG (52.9% vs 21.2%, p = 0.023), and the association remained significant on multivariate analysis (OR: 6.255, p = 0.014). Patients with AA genotype in ABCC5 1146A>G tended to be associated with PFS, but this was not statistically significant (HR: 0.464, p = 0.074). On the other hand, there was no significant association between CA19-9 responses and DCK-1205C>T (rs4694362), TT/CT genotype in DCK-1205C>T was significantly associated with prolonged PFS compared to CC (median, 127 vs 48 days, p = 0.002), and the association remained significant on multivariate analysis (HR: 0.153, p = 0.028). No GPs were significantly associated with OS, and the presence of second-line chemotherapy was the only relevant factor. In terms of safety, no GPs were significantly associated with either neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: The results suggest that ABCC5 and DCK might be related to the efficacy of treatment with GEM, but further research is needed. Clinical trial information: UMIN000012720 .
oncology