Abstract:Background: PCR has the potential to detect and precisely quantify specific DNA sequences, but it is not yet often used as a fully quantitative method. A number of data collection and processing strategies have been described for the implementation of quantitative PCR. However, they can be experimentally cumbersome, their relative performances have not been evaluated systematically, and they often remain poorly validated statistically and/or experimentally. In this study, we evaluated the performance of known methods, and compared them with newly developed data processing strategies in terms of resolution, precision and robustness. Results: Our results indicate that simple methods that do not rely on the estimation of the efficiency of the PCR amplification may provide reproducible and sensitive data, but that they do not quantify DNA with precision. Other evaluated methods based on sigmoidal or exponential curve fitting were generally of both poor resolution and precision. A statistical analysis of the parameters that influence efficiency indicated that it depends mostly on the selected amplicon and to a lesser extent on the particular biological sample analyzed. Thus, we devised various strategies based on individual or averaged efficiency values, which were used to assess the regulated expression of several genes in response to a growth factor. Conclusion: Overall, qPCR data analysis methods differ significantly in their performance, and this analysis identifies methods that provide DNA quantification estimates of high precision, robustness and reliability. These methods allow reliable estimations of relative expression ratio of two-fold or higher, and our analysis provides an estimation of the number of biological samples that have to be analyzed to achieve a given precision.

Improving the quality of quantitative polymerase chain reaction experiments: 15 years of MIQE

Reporting quality of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) methods in scientific publications

The need for transparency and good practices in the qPCR literature

Statistical significance of quantitative PCR

Introducing Theoretical Principles of Semi-, Relative, and Absolute Quantification Via Conventional, Real-Time, and Digital PCR to Graduate and Senior Undergraduate Students of Chemistry

Evaluation of the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms and primer mismatches on quantitative PCR

Disclosing quantitative RT-PCR raw data during manuscript submission: a call for action

pcr: an R package for quality assessment, analysis and testing of qPCR data

Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR

Statistical Analysis of Quantitative RT-PCR Results

The System Setting for Diagnostic Reagents of Polymerase Chain Reaction Nucleic Acid Amplification

Primerbank: A Pcr Primer Database for Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis, 2012 Update

Revolutionizing Molecular Biology: The Evolution of PCR through Troubleshooting and Optimization

Improving Baseline Subtraction for Increased Sensitivity of Quantitative PCR Measurements

Comprehensive algorithm for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Basic principles of real-time quantitative PCR

The Importance of and a Method for Including Transfection Efficiency into Real‐time PCR Data Analyses

Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data

Obtaining Reliable RT-qPCR Results in Molecular Diagnostics—MIQE Goals and Pitfalls for Transcriptional Biomarker Discovery

RT-qPCR Protocol Optimization Assessment with Propidium Monoazide for Viable and Non-Viable Pathogen Detection

Exploring the Impact of Primer–Template Mismatches on PCR Performance of DNA Polymerases Varying in Proofreading Activity