Integral Uniform Flows in Symmetric Networks

F. Shahrokhi,L. Székely

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10692760_22

1998-06-18

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Potential consumer response to the healthy symbol proposed by the U.S. food and Drug Administration

Jillian Hyink,Brandon R McFadden,Brenna Ellison

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30863

IF: 3.776

2024-05-08

Heliyon

Abstract:The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed updates to the definition of "healthy," including distinctions between types of sugar and fats and limits on added sugar, saturated fat, and sodium. To communicate the updated standards, the FDA is developing a Healthy symbol to display on food packages, which could reduce knowledge gaps by assisting U.S. consumers in meeting recommended nutritional guidelines. This study aimed to explore the potential for the label to increase consumers' ability to correctly identify a food product that met the FDA's criteria for a healthy symbol. To complete the study objective, 1018 adults were recruited to represent the U.S. population regarding gender, age, income, and geographic region, and a randomized group experiment was used to determine the potential communication value of an FDA Healthy symbol. Respondents were randomized to a group shown either a healthy yogurt with the FDA symbol, a healthy yogurt without the symbol, or an unhealthy yogurt. Respondents were then asked whether they considered the yogurt shown to be healthy, a question examining the desired criteria for the Healthy symbol, willingness to accept various costs to implement the symbol, and questions to measure objective dietary knowledge. Adding the symbol to yogurt that already met the healthy criteria only yielded about a 4 percentage point increase in the proportion of respondents identifying it as healthy. However, 53 % of participants still identified a yogurt too high in added sugars as healthy. For the desired label criteria, 64 % of respondents selected limits on added sugars, 57 % selected limits on sodium, and 54 % selected limits on saturated fats, which all align with the proposed updates to the definition of healthy. Over half of the participants supported the implementation of the label, even at a cost of $40 annually, and 86 % supported implementation at no cost.
Consideration of nutrition and sustainability in public definitions of ‘healthy’ food: an analysis of submissions to the US FDA

Emily H Belarmino,Michelle Carfagno,Lauren Kam,Kene-Chukwu Ifeagwu,Miriam E Nelson,Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980024000636

2024-01-01

Public Health Nutrition

Abstract:Abstract Objective: To better understand how the public defines ‘healthy’ foods and to determine whether the public considers sustainability, implicitly and explicitly, in the context of healthy eating. Design: We conducted a content analysis of public comments submitted to the US FDA in 2016 and 2017 in response to an invitation for feedback on use of the term ‘healthy’ on food labels. The analysis explored the ways in which commenters’ definitions of ‘healthy’ aligned with the 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans and whether their definitions considered sustainability. Setting: The US Government’s Regulations.gov website. Participants: All 1125 unique comments from individuals and organisations. Results: Commenters’ definitions of ‘healthy’ generally mirrored the recommendations that the Dietary Guidelines for Americans put forth to promote a ‘healthy eating pattern’. Commenters emphasised the healthfulness of fruit, vegetables, whole grains, fish and other minimally processed foods and the need to limit added sugars, sodium, saturated and trans fats and other ingredients sometimes added during processing. One-third of comments ( n 374) incorporated at least one dimension of sustainability, mainly the environmental dimension. Commenters who mentioned environmental considerations primarily expressed concerns about synthetic chemicals and genetic modification. Less than 20 % of comments discussed social or economic dimensions of sustainability, and less than 3 % of comments ( n 30) used the word ‘sustainability’ explicitly. Conclusions: This novel analysis provides new information about the public’s perceptions of ‘healthy’ foods relative to nutrition and sustainability considerations. The findings can be used to advance policy discussions regarding nutrition labelling and guidance.

public, environmental & occupational health,nutrition & dietetics
Consumer perception of dried dairy ingredients: Healthy, natural, and sustainable?

A.N. Schiano,P.D. Gerard,M.A. Drake

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-20589

IF: 4.225

2021-12-01

Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract:Conscious consumerism is growing, along with consumer demand for socially conscious dairy products or dairy alternatives. To successfully position dairy products (especially conventional dairy) in this changing marketplace, dairy producers and processors must understand how to strategically use both on- and off-package messaging aligned with consumer perceptions. However, consumer perception of attributes such as sustainable, natural, and healthy is complex, and varies between product categories as well as among products within a category. The objective of this study was to characterize consumer definitions of the terms "sustainable," "natural," and "healthy" as they pertain to dried dairy ingredients. To meet this objective, we conducted an online survey with 3 maximum difference scaling exercises to determine the importance of 63 label claims to consumer definitions of the terms sustainable, natural, and healthy. The role of priming with dried ingredient processing information on consumer perception of these terms was also explored. Within the dried dairy ingredients category, there is extensive cognitive overlap between the terms sustainable, natural, and healthy. Priming did not affect consumer definitions of any of these terms. Certification-related claims were considered among the least important claims for consumer definitions of sustainable, natural, and healthy, whereas claims that were simple to read and visualize were considered among the most important. Claims related to animal welfare and happiness or simple, minimal ingredients and processing were considered by consumers to be important for all 3 terms. For each of these terms, there was a cluster of consumers who defined the term primarily by simple ingredients and minimal processing, and another cluster who defined the term primarily by happy cows and conscious farming practices. The terms sustainable and healthy each had a third, unique consumer cluster. This third definition cluster defined sustainability primarily by environmental effects, whereas this cluster defined healthy primarily in fitness and nutrition terms. Age and to a lesser extent, gender, affected importance placed on these 3 terms and also affected definition of the term. Understanding these consumer definitions provides insight on how to formulate marketing and educational messaging to speak to each consumer segment.

food science & technology,agriculture, dairy & animal science
Using the Theory of Perceived Value to Determine the Willingness to Consume Foods from a Healthy Brand: The Role of Health Consciousness

Roger Albornoz,Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas,Dany Yudet Millones-Liza,Miluska Villar-Guevara,Gladys Toyohama-Pocco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16131995

IF: 5.9

2024-06-24

Nutrients

Abstract:Eating low amounts of healthy foods leads to high rates of diet-related diseases. How can we control and reduce the increase in these diseases? One of the recommendations is to improve nutritional competence, which means greater health consciousness. The objective of the present study is to determine the influence of health consciousness on the dimensions of perceived value and their impact on the willingness to consume foods from a healthy brand. Through a non-experimental, cross-sectional, and explanatory study, the responses of 518 participants (men and women) who confirmed being consumers of the healthy brands of food were analyzed. The study included adults aged from 18 to 58 years recruited using non-probability sampling. Data was collected using a self-report form and statistically analyzed using Smart PLS. The findings support that health awareness positively and significantly influences perceived quality value, perceived financial value, perceived social value, and perceived emotional value; contrary to this, it was detected that the perceived financial value does not influence the willingness to consume foods from healthy brands. This study contributes significantly to health science by showing how the theory of perceived value predicts the intention to consume healthy brands, with health consciousness intervening in this prediction. Therefore, it is concluded that the study population that consumes healthy foods has experienced the positive impact of perceived value and reports that the factors that comprise it influence their intention to consume healthy foods.

nutrition & dietetics
Health psychology and consumers' perception of claims on food

J. Kennedy,G. Kavanagh,F. Lalor,D. Minogue,P. Wall

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665108009324

2008-05-01

Proceedings of The Nutrition Society

Abstract:Over the past number of years there has been a substantial increase in the number and type of nutrition and health claims appearing on food labels and in 2006 a new European Regulation (EC 1924/2006) was introduced into law. The main aim of this new Regulation is to allow the ‘average consumer’ to make informed food choices. Thus, the consumer knowledge base and likely uptake of foods with health claims is an issue of pressing importance for food regulators and manufacturers. The study consisted of 226 students. Participants were initially recruited by addressing a convenient sample of classes in the four major universities in Dublin and subsequently via the snowball method. Validated scales were used to assess perceived dietary health, perceived credibility of health claims and dietary knowledge. When asked about how credible they found a list of health claims, more participants were inclined to believe a health claim about ‘probiotic cultures which aid healthy digestion’ (60.0%) than ‘calcium to promote healthy bones and teeth’ (57.8%), ‘plant stanols which help to reduce cholesterol’ (52.6%) or ‘fibre which can help lower cholesterol’ (50.7%). Health claims were perceived as more credible when they were on yoghurt (61.9%) than cheese (59.3%), milk (57.0%) or breakfast cereal (55.9%). One-quarter (25.5%) of participants reported that they had not bought any products with health claims in the last month. Of the participants who had purchased products with claims, those who purchased products to ‘promote healthy bones and teeth’ were more likely to purchase this product again (98.0%). Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient indicated a significant association between gender and purchase of products claiming to lower cholesterol (r 0.15, n 226, P<0.05) but not for those promoting healthy digestion (r0.112, n 226, P= 0.11) or healthy bones and teeth (r 0.01, n 226, P= 0.88). Males were more likely to purchase products with claims to lower cholesterol. The present study shows that students are more inclined to believe health claims that have short-term health benefits rather than those with longer-term consequences. As shown previously, the life-cycle position of individuals influences food choices. The present study has highlighted the way in which students perceive claims on food and further studies are needed to include a representative sample of ‘average consumers’ as indicated by the legislation.

Psychology
Consumer Characteristics, Nutrition Labels and Dietary Choices

Khaled Aboulnasr

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10951-0_106

2014-10-13

Abstract:The Center for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that a considerable segment of American adults suffers from obesity (CDC 2012). Given the strong link between consumers’ dietary behaviors and the rising obesity rates, the Food and Drug Administration has introduced a number of transformative guidelines to the way nutrition information is presented on food products. These changes aimed at aiding consumers make better food choices by making the nutrition label less complicated and more comprehensible (Burton, Garretson & Velliquette 1999). While these efforts may have simplified the nutrition label, the utilization of nutrition information prior to making food purchase decisions may be influenced by consumers’ characteristics, beliefs and knowledge. The current study investigates the role of self efficacy, response efficacy and consumers’ nutrition knowledge in the process of nutrition information use. Results of the study emphasized the important role of these variables in consumers’ dietary behavior and choices.
Consumer perceptions of healthy and sustainable eating

Daniel Hazley,John M Kearney

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665124004853

2024-09-05

Abstract:The current food system is unsustainable. It encourages unhealthy food choices, increasing the risk of non-communicable diseases, and has a substantial environmental impact, responsible for around a third of all anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Improving both public and planetary health will require dietary change. To promote this transition, it is crucial to understand how consumers conceptualise healthy and sustainable eating. The aim of this review was to examine how adults from high-income countries interpret healthy and sustainable eating, with a specific focus on Ireland and the UK. As healthy eating and sustainable eating are often conceptualised as distinctive constructs, we explored each of these separately before examining how consumers perceive them together. Most consumers have a reasonable understanding of what constitutes a healthy diet, with many echoing aspects consistent with dietary guidelines. However, consumers perceptions of healthy eating often extend beyond these health-centric recommendations, incorporating concepts such as the pleasure of eating and supporting mental well-being. Sustainable eating, on the other hand, is less well understood. Most consumers overemphasise the importance of eating local, organic food and reducing packaging and underestimate or are unaware of the environmental impact of red meat consumption. These findings provide a clear opportunity to improve public awareness of healthy and sustainable diets. Moreover, they emphasise the need to promote the synergies between healthy and sustainable dietary practices. However, knowledge alone will not be enough to change behaviour. Future interventions should also seek to overcome consumers competing dietary priorities and create system-wide changes.
'Language is the source of misunderstandings'--impact of terminology on public perceptions of health promotion messages

Christina H Buckton,Michael E J Lean,Emilie Combet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1884-1

IF: 4.5

2015-06-23

BMC Public Health

Abstract:Background: The high level of premature death due to non-communicable diseases has been associated with unhealthful lifestyles, including poor diet. The effectiveness of public health strategies designed to promote health via messages focusing on food and diets depends largely on the perception of the messages by the public. The aim of this study was to explore public perceptions of language commonly used to communicate concepts linking health, food and the diet. Methods: This study is a qualitative and semi-quantitative cross-sectional survey exploring public perceptions of terms used to improve eating habits within public health strategies. We recruited adults with no background in nutrition or health-care, from May to July 2013, from urban areas of varying deprivation (n = 12) in Glasgow and Edinburgh, UK. Four key prompt-terms used to convey the idea of improving health through diet were selected for testing: Healthy Eating, Eating for Health, Balanced Diet and Nutritional Balance. Consumer understanding of these terms was explored using mixed-methods, including qualitative focus groups (n = 17) and an interviewer-led word-association exercise (n = 270). Results: The word-association exercise produced 1,386 individual responses from the four prompt-terms, with 130 unique responses associated with a single term. Cluster analysis revealed 16 key themes, with responses affected by prompt-term used, age, gender and socio-economic status. Healthy Eating was associated with foods considered 'healthy' (p <0.05); Eating for Health and Balanced Diet with negative connotations of foods to avoid (both p <0.001) and Nutritional Balance with the benefits of eating healthily (p <0.01). Focus groups revealed clear differences in perceptions: Eating for Health = positive action one takes to manage existing medical conditions, Healthy Eating = passive aspirational term associated with weight management, Balanced Diet = old fashioned, also dieting for weight loss, Nutritional Balance = maximising physical performance. Food suppliers use Healthy Eating terminology to promote weight management products. Focus group participants welcomed product reformulation to enhance food health properties as a strategy to overcome desensitisation to health-messages. Conclusions: Public perceptions of messages communicating concepts linking health, food and the diet are influenced by terminology, resulting in confusion. To increase individual commitment to change eating habits in the long term, public health campaigns need strengthening, potentially by investing in tailored approaches to meet the needs of defined groups of consumers.
The Dynamic Impacts of Public Perceptions of Fast-Food Products with Nutrition Facts on Fast-Food Consumption

Po-Lin Pan,Manu Bhandari,Li Zeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229913

IF: 3.9

2024-11-16

Sustainability

Abstract:Although most American eat at a fast-food restaurant 1 to 3 times a week, they would realize that fast food consumption is highly associated with chronic diseases and generates negative impacts on their health. As fast-food consumers become more health-conscious, fast-food brands strive to build a more health-oriented image on their fast-food products. Thus, this study proposes a conceptual model that aims to examine direct and indirect impacts of consumers' BMI, self-efficacy, perceived brand trust, and brand commitment on their fast-food consumption. An online survey using Amazon Mechanical Turk is conducted with a total of 484 female and 380 male participants included in the final analysis. Results show that the mediating effects of self-efficacy, brand trust in, and brand commitment with the fast-food product with nutrition facts are significantly generated on consumers' fast-food consumption. Moreover, indirect effects are found on consumers' fast-food consumption via the nexus of their self-efficacy, brand trust, and brand commitment. The study also offers practical insights into the impact of health-conscious consumers' brand perceptions on their fast-food consumption.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
A social marketing perspective of young adults' concepts of eating for health: is it a question of morality?

Linda Brennan,Karen Klassen,Enqi Weng,Shinyi Chin,Annika Molenaar,Michael Reid,Helen Truby,Tracy A. McCaffrey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-00946-3

2020-03-30

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract:Abstract Background Poor dietary choices are a risk factor for non-communicable diseases. Young adults have low levels of engagement towards their health and may not see the importance in the adoption of healthy eating behaviours at this stage in their lives. Here we utilise social marketing principles, digital ethnography and online conversations to gain insights into young adults’ attitudes and sentiments towards healthy eating. Methods Young Australian adults who use social media at least twice a day were recruited by a commercial field house. Using a mixture of methods, combining online polls, forums and conversations, participants ( n = 195, 18–24 years old) engaged in facilitated discussions over an extended 4 week period about health and eating-related topics. Data were analysed using thematic analysis constant comparison approach. A post-hoc conceptual framework related to religion was theorised and used as a metaphor to describe the results. Results Findings demonstrate that different segments of young adults with varying attitudes and interest towards healthy eating exist. We developed a conceptual framework based on consumer segmentation which adopted religious metaphors as a typology of ‘consumers’. Some young adults practice and believe in the message of healthy eating ( saints ), whilst some oppose these messages and are not motivated to make any change ( sinners ), another segment are both aware of and interested in the issues but do not put healthy eating behaviours as a current priority ( person in the pew ). Conclusions Consumer segmentation and social marketing techniques assist health professionals to understand their target audience and tailor specific messages to different segments. Segmentation provides insights on which groups may be most easily influenced to adopt the desired behaviours. The typology presented may be a useful tool for health professionals and social marketers to design strategies to engage young adults in healthy eating, particularly those in the pew who are contemplating a change but lacking the motivation. The utilisation of marketing segmentation in health promotion has the potential to enhance health messaging by tailoring messages to specific segments based on their needs, beliefs and intentions and therefore drive the efficient use of resources towards those most likely to change.

nutrition & dietetics,physiology
The Effects of Social Distance and Front-of-Package Claims on Healthy Food Selection: Moderating Role of Perceived Importance of Eating Healthily

Veena Chattaraman,Yee Ming Lee,Ebony Marchelle Robinson,Adam J Book,Fnu Al-Amin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15153427

IF: 5.9

2023-08-02

Nutrients

Abstract:Applying construal level theory, this study examined how social distance (thinking of self/children), front-of-package (FOP) claim type (nutrient/health/control), and perceived importance of eating healthily (low/high) impact consumer responses (attitudes/purchase intent) to healthier food products through an online experiment with 171 U.S. parents from low-to-mid socio-economic households. Participants were randomly assigned to view controlled images of healthier foods with packaging that bore different claim types for real and fictitious brands. Results revealed that when choosing for themselves, consumer attitudes were more positive when the healthier food package carried a nutrient (vs. health) claim, however, control claims received the most positive evaluations. When choosing for children, attitudes were more positive when the package carried a health (vs. nutrient/control) claim. Attitudes toward healthier foods were higher for consumers with high (vs. low) perceived importance of eating healthily when the package bore a nutrient claim, however, their attitudes did not significantly differ when the package bore a health/control claim. Purchase intent for healthier foods was higher for consumers with high (vs. low) perceived importance of healthy eating when shopping for self; whereas, when shopping for children, purchase intent did not significantly differ between consumers who varied in perceived importance of eating healthily.
Public Perceptions of Food Safety: Assessing the RisksPosed by Genetic Modification, Irradiation, Pesticides,Microbiological Contamination and High Fat/High CalorieFoods

M. Mehta

Abstract:[Excerpt] "In general, people in the developed world have access to a safe and varied supply of food. Instead of systemic hunger, many developed countries have problems with obesity and other kinds of eating disorders among their citizenry. It is within this context that some find public concerns about the safety of food both paradoxical and misplaced. Nevertheless, understanding how people perceive the risk associated with food is an important exercise in demonstrating accountability and in setting priorities for regulation. With the advent of technologies for producing genetically modified foods, and the development of fat blockers like Olestra, the public is increasingly being asked to judge the social acceptability of various kinds of food modifications. In addition to interpreting the risks and benefits associated with these newer innovations, the public is also balancing the risks and benefits of more familiar food interventions. Not only must consumers of food assess the merits of genetic modification and food irradiation, they still must consider exposure to pesticide residues and microbiological contaminants like Salmonella, Listeria, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter. Additionally, with high rates of cardiovascular disease and elevated concerns about developing diseases like diabetes, many people seriously consider the fat and sugar content of the foods they consume. This exploratory study examines how the public perceives food risks by employing a ranking exercise, a scale for assessing food safety practices, a scale for combining elements from the psychometric paradigm (e.g., voluntary exposure, perceived benefit, and perceived risk) across five potential food hazards, and demographic variables (sex, age, and level of education) most commonly linked to the perception of food risks."

Medicine,Environmental Science
Factors that Influence the Perceived Healthiness of Food—Review

Brigitta Plasek,Zoltán Lakner,Ágoston Temesi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061881

IF: 5.9

2020-06-24

Nutrients

Abstract:The interest of consumers is the consumption of healthy food, whereas the interest of food manufacturers is that consumers recognize the produced “healthier” food items on the shelves, so they can satisfy their demands. This way, identifying the factors that influence the perceived healthiness of food products is a mutual interest. What causes consumers to consider one product more beneficial to health than another? In recent years, numerous studies have been published on the topic of the influence of several health-related factors on consumer perception. This analysis collected and categorized the research results related to this question. This review collects 59 articles with the help of the search engines Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, MDPI and Emerald Insight between 1 January 2014 and 31 March 2019. Our paper yielded six separate categories that influence consumers in their perception of the healthiness of food items: the communicated information—like FoP labels and health claims, the product category, the shape and colour of the product packaging, the ingredients of the product, the organic origin of the product, and the taste and other sensory features of the product.

nutrition & dietetics
Determinants of Israeli consumers' decision to use food label information more frequently: a national survey study

Shosh Shahrabani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-021-00462-0

2021-03-15

Abstract:Background: Food labeling to encourage healthier food choices may have positive long-term effects. Yet previous studies point to challenges in terms of how consumers understand and use labeling information. The current study seeks to determine how psychological factors related to health and nutrition, food label perceptions, nutrition habits and sociodemographic factors are associated with consumers' decisions to seek and use the information on nutrition food labels more frequently. Methods: The survey was conducted by a polling company in Israel between November 11 and December 12, 2019. Participants comprised a representative sample of the adult population in Israel age 21 and over. A total of 513 people returned the completed questionnaires, which included the following parts: personal details; frequency of searching for information on food product labels; perceived health risks of foods high in sodium, sugar and saturated fats; Health Belief Model constructs related to food labeling. The statistical analysis entailed ordinal logistics regressions. Results: While 59.3% of the sample reported that the information on food labels often or always affects their decision to purchase a food product, more than 20% reported often or always consuming products that are high in sugar (32.0%), saturated fats (31.3%) and salt (20.4%). The results of the analytical model show the following HBM variables to be significantly associated with frequency of using information on food labels: higher levels of perceived benefit (OR = 1.72, CI 95% = 1.12-2.64); higher confidence in reading and understanding food labels (OR = 2.48, CI 95% = 1.62-3.78); and higher perceptions of the importance of nutrition (OR = 2.76, CI 95% =1.97-3.87). In addition, women and married people were found to use food label information more frequently. Conclusions: General public information campaigns and HMOs campaigns with messages to motivate the use of food labels should emphasize the benefits of using labels to select food products. These messages should aim at increasing individuals' perceived confidence in understanding the information on nutrition labels. The recent front-of-package labeling reform could be an important policy step for achieving healthier nutrition.
Consumer psychology for food choices: a systematic review and research directions

Abdul Wahid Khan,Jatin Pandey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-07-2021-0566

IF: 5.181

2023-01-19

European Journal of Marketing

Abstract:Purpose Consumer food behavior has received considerable attention from marketers, researchers and regulators. With the rising obesity epidemic worldwide, the existing literature and previous reviews provide a limited understanding of consumers' unhealthy food choices. To address this gap, this study aims to investigate consumer psychology for food choices in terms of mental processes and behavior. Design/methodology/approach This systematic literature review analyzed 84 research papers accessed from the Web of Science database and selected high-quality marketing journals. A detailed analysis identified themes arranged in an organizing framework. Gaps, limitations, convergence and ambivalent findings were noted to derive future research directions. Findings Major themes in the literature include food marketers' actions (food stimuli and context), environmental influence (micro and macro) and consumer psychology and personal factors, leading to food choice related decisions. The antecedents and consequences of food choice healthiness are summarized. Several studies converged on the benefits of health motivations and goals, food literacy and customizing meals bottom-up on food choice healthiness. Research limitations/implications This review helps researchers gain state-of-the-art understanding on consumer psychology for food choices. It presents ambivalent and converging findings, gaps and limitations of extant research to inform researchers about issues that need to be addressed in the literature. This review presents future research questions to guide research on critical issues. This literature review contributes to marketing domain literature on consumer's food well-being and overall well-being. Practical implications This review offers actionable insights for food marketers, policymakers and nongovernmental organizations to drive consumer demand for healthier foods, focusing on food labeling, food environment, message framing and raising consumer awareness. Originality/value This review offers current understanding of consumer psychology for food choices focusing on healthiness, an aspect lacking in previous literature reviews.

business
A focused ethnographic study on the role of health and sustainability in food choice decisions

Elizabeth L Fox,Claire Davis,Shauna M Downs,Rebecca McLaren,Jessica Fanzo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105319

IF: 5.016

2021-10-01

Appetite

Abstract:In the United States, typical dietary patterns are not necessarily healthy and sustainable. In order to shift diets, we need to provide support to individuals in a way that reflects what matters most to them. In this study, we aimed to identify the considerations that are most important to individuals regarding food-related decisions, and to determine how those considerations relate to specific foods, with a focus on health and environmental sustainability. In a sequential mixed-methods design, we first conducted 27 semi-structured interviews with participants in California and Nebraska. These interviews included a free-listing activity, where we used a technical construct of salience, Smith's S Index, to identify the considerations that were most important to our participants. We followed up with 20 of those participants to complete a pile-sorting survey, where participants sorted and rated 42 food items for price, taste, health, convenience, familiarity, and environmental impact. Our findings showed that the most salient considerations cited by our participants were price, health, taste, and time. There was consensus for how participants rated the foods for price, taste, convenience, and familiarity. However, there was only weak consensus for how participants rated the foods for health impact, and no consensus for how participants rated the foods for environmental impact. There was also disagreement on how to sort new plant-based products intended to replace or substitute meat and other animal-based foods. These findings have implications for how to communicate about healthy and sustainable diets. They highlight conflicting considerations, disagreement in classification of new products, and limited consensus for perceived health and environmental impact of foods, which present challenges to the achievement of diets that are healthy and environmentally sustainable in the United States.
US Consumers’ Understanding of Nutrition Labels in 2013: The Importance of Health Literacy

Alexander Persoskie,Erin Hennessy,Wendy L. Nelson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd14.170066

2017-09-28

Preventing Chronic Disease

Abstract:INTRODUCTION: We examined US adults' understanding of a Nutrition Facts panel (NFP), which requires health literacy (ie, prose, document, and quantitative literacy skills), and the association between label understanding and dietary behavior.METHODS: Data were from the Health Information National Trends Survey, a nationally representative survey of health information seeking among US adults (N = 3,185) conducted from September 6, 2013, through December 30, 2013. Participants viewed an ice cream nutrition label and answered 4 questions that tested their ability to apply basic arithmetic and understanding of percentages to interpret the label. Participants reported their intake of sugar-sweetened soda, fruits, and vegetables. Regression analyses tested associations among label understanding, demographic characteristics, and self-reported dietary behaviors.RESULTS: Approximately 24% of people could not determine the calorie content of the full ice-cream container, 21% could not estimate the number of servings equal to 60 g of carbohydrates, 42% could not estimate the effect on daily calorie intake of foregoing 1 serving, and 41% could not calculate the percentage daily value of calories in a single serving. Higher scores for label understanding were associated with consuming more vegetables and less sugar-sweetened soda, although only the association with soda consumption remained significant after adjusting for demographic factors.CONCLUSION: Many consumers have difficulty interpreting nutrition labels, and label understanding correlates with self-reported dietary behaviors. The 2016 revised NFP labels may address some deficits in consumer understanding by eliminating the need to perform certain calculations (eg, total calories per package). However, some tasks still require the ability to perform calculations (eg, percentage daily value of calories). Schools have a role in teaching skills, such as mathematics, needed for nutrition label understanding.

public, environmental & occupational health
Influence of Healthy Brand and Diagnosticity of Brand Name on Subjective Ratings of High- and Low-Calorie Food

Chengchen Zhang,Jiayi Han,Xiyu Guo,Jianping Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010070

2023-01-13

Abstract:Brand names on food packaging and the diagnosticity of brand names have notable effects on consumer preferences. However, their effects on healthy food consumption are not clear. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of healthy brands and the diagnosticity of brand names on consumers' subjective ratings of different calorie foods. In two studies, participants viewed 32 pictures of high- and low-calorie food product packaging from healthy and unhealthy brands and rated their feelings and willingness to pay online. Study 1 used real brand names, and Study 2 used fictional brand names and added press releases to manipulate diagnosticity. The present study demonstrated that participants perceived foods from healthy brands as healthier but less delicious and were more willing to buy low-calorie foods from healthy brands. Moreover, only when the brand name was of high diagnosticity were high-calorie foods rated as more likable, and did the willingness to pay for low-calorie foods increase. Collectively, these findings highlight the influence of the healthy brand on consumers' subjective ratings of food. It is also inspiring for healthy food marketing.
Nutrition and Health Claims as Marketing Tools

Vincent J. van buul,Fred J. P. H. Brouns

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.754738

IF: 11.208

2013-12-23

Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract:European regulations mandate that only substantiated and approved statements can be used as nutrition- and health-related claims in food marketing. A thorough understanding of consumer perceptions of these approved claims is needed to assess their impact on both the purchase intention of functional foods and the development of innovative functional food concepts. In this paper, a conceptual framework on the European consumers' perception of nutrition and health claims on these functional foods is proposed. Through a literature review, common independent variables are structured, and an analysis of these variables shows that nutrition and health claims are mostly only perceived positive by specific target consumers (who need the product, accept the ingredient, understand the benefit, and trust the brand). These consumers indicate that the products with substantiated and approved claims help them in reaching overall health goals. This increased expectation in functional efficacy may mediate an increase in repurchase intent, overall liking, and the amount consumers are willing to spend. Other consumers, however, may have adverse reactions towards nutrition and health claims on functional foods. Implications for the consumer and the industry are discussed.

food science & technology,nutrition & dietetics
The Healthier the Tastier? USA-India Comparison Studies on Consumer Perception of a Nutritious Agricultural Product at Different Food Processing Levels

Laurette Dubé,Hajar Fatemi,Ji Lu,Cristian Hertzer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00006

2016-01-28

Abstract:Present research compares food beliefs associated with a naturally nutritious agricultural product (namely pulses) in Western and Eastern cultures (namely the US and India). Specifically, this paper focuses on the perception of healthiness and tastefulness of the food and their relationship. Two studies tested the effect of processing level, cultural differences, and branding strategies. In contrast to the well-established inverse relationship between healthiness and tastefulness beliefs observed in the West with industrial food products, the results of both studies revealed a positive association between health and taste for pulses in both West and East. Study 1 shows that this positive association is stronger with lower processing, suggesting the role of naturalness as bridge between health and taste. Focusing on cultural differences, results show that while both West and East hold positive association of health and taste for pulses, this association is stronger for East. However, the role of processing level is significantly stronger in West. Study 2 looks at branding strategies for pulse products with different processing levels in West and East. Results confirm the findings of study 1 on positive association of taste and healthiness and cross-cultural differences. Moreover, study 2 shows that cultural difference between West and East changes the effect of branding strategies on food-related belief and attitude toward food. For American consumers, a future-oriented branding is associated with an enhanced positive healthiness-taste association, whereas a brand image emphasizing tradition leads to increased perception of the taste of product but not necessarily on the healthiness. Current paper has theoretical and practical implications in public policy, health, and marketing.

Integral Uniform Flows in Symmetric Networks

Potential consumer response to the healthy symbol proposed by the U.S. food and Drug Administration

Consideration of nutrition and sustainability in public definitions of ‘healthy’ food: an analysis of submissions to the US FDA

Consumer perception of dried dairy ingredients: Healthy, natural, and sustainable?

Using the Theory of Perceived Value to Determine the Willingness to Consume Foods from a Healthy Brand: The Role of Health Consciousness

Health psychology and consumers' perception of claims on food

Consumer Characteristics, Nutrition Labels and Dietary Choices

Consumer perceptions of healthy and sustainable eating

'Language is the source of misunderstandings'--impact of terminology on public perceptions of health promotion messages

The Dynamic Impacts of Public Perceptions of Fast-Food Products with Nutrition Facts on Fast-Food Consumption

A social marketing perspective of young adults' concepts of eating for health: is it a question of morality?

The Effects of Social Distance and Front-of-Package Claims on Healthy Food Selection: Moderating Role of Perceived Importance of Eating Healthily

Public Perceptions of Food Safety: Assessing the RisksPosed by Genetic Modification, Irradiation, Pesticides,Microbiological Contamination and High Fat/High CalorieFoods

Factors that Influence the Perceived Healthiness of Food—Review

Determinants of Israeli consumers' decision to use food label information more frequently: a national survey study

Consumer psychology for food choices: a systematic review and research directions

A focused ethnographic study on the role of health and sustainability in food choice decisions

US Consumers’ Understanding of Nutrition Labels in 2013: The Importance of Health Literacy

Influence of Healthy Brand and Diagnosticity of Brand Name on Subjective Ratings of High- and Low-Calorie Food

Nutrition and Health Claims as Marketing Tools

The Healthier the Tastier? USA-India Comparison Studies on Consumer Perception of a Nutritious Agricultural Product at Different Food Processing Levels