Differential lung ventilation for refractory hypoxemia management under video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery VATS
Flavio Veintemilla Sig Tu,Erika Pinos Vélez,Flavio Veintemilla Burgos,Ruddy Loffredo Barrezueta,Julia Peralta Sanchez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154750
IF: 4.298
2024-04-01
Journal of Critical Care
Abstract:Introduction In thoracic and pulmonary surgery, one lung ventilation in the lateral decubitus position produce changes in the ventilation/perfusion ratio in the upper (non-dependent) as well as at the lower (dependent) lung1. A physiological compensatory protective reflex like hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) is activated2, nevertheless even using recruitment maneuvers hypoxemia may still occur2. Case(s) A 47-year-old, 77 kg male patient was scheduled for an apical left lower lobe lung tumor resection under video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS) with normal preoperatory tests. Monitoring included EKG, invasive arterial blood pressure (IABP), pulse oximetry (SpO2), capnography (ETCO2), bispectral analysis (BIS), regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) (INVOSTM 5100C; Covidien/Medtronic Inc., USA) and diuresis. Antibiotic prophylaxis and pre-emptive analgesia were administered. Anesthesia was based on propofol TCI, rocuronium and remifentanil with a BIS target lower than 45. A peripheral vein with a #18 Fr and an ultrasound-guided central venous catheter with left internal jugular approach were placed as venous access. The intubation-positioning of a Robertshaw 37 Fr right double lumen tube was achieved with a video laryngoscope C-MACTM and flexible video endoscope (Karl Storz, Tutlingen, Germany). Clamping tests were also applied before and after changing patient position. The controlled ventilation parameters were adjusted by capnography: TV: 500 ml, RF: 12, I:E: 1:2, PEEP: 8 cmH2O, FiO2: 0.7. After 45 min, during the tumor detachment (8x4x3cm) hypoxemia and hypercarbia developed. Verifying the position and patency of the tracheal tube and increasing FiO2 to 1.0, recruitment maneuvers were initiated. At minute 90 with hypoxemia (SpO2 < 83%, PaO2 58 mmHg) and hypercapnia, differential ventilation was started. The parameters were TV: 85 ml, PEEP: 5 cmH2O, RF: 10, FiO2:0.7 (non-dependent lung) and TV: 450 ml, I:E: 1:2, PEEP: 8 cmH2O, RF: 12 /minute and FiO2:1.0 (dependent lung), Peak airway pressures were 12 and 25 cmH2O, respectively. Subsequently, oximetry improved to 98–100%. The patient, transferred to the ICU after 290 min, hemodynamically stable, with adequate arterial blood gases, 700 ml blood loss and 280 ml diuresis underwent an uncomplicated postoperative period, being discharged five days after surgery. Conclusions Differential lung ventilation is a good option to improve oxygenation and gas exchange in one lung anesthesia for VATS, with minor influence at the surgical field and hemodynamics. References 1. Ashok V, Francis J. A practical approach to adult one-lung ventilation. BJA Educ 2018; 18:69–74. 2. Hughes JM. Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction: Clinical implications. Eur Respir J 2016; 47:31–34.
critical care medicine