Abstract:BackgroundAerobic exercise reduces blood pressure (BP), but it is unknown whether a high-intensity training approach can elicit a greater BP reduction in populations with elevated BP. This systematic review compared the efficacy of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for reducing BP in adults with pre- to established hypertension.MethodsFive electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PEDro, and SPORTDiscus) were searched for randomized trials comparing the chronic effects of HIIT versus MICT on BP in individuals with resting systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 85 mmHg and/or under antihypertensive medication. Random-effects modelling was used to compare changes from pre- to post-intervention in resting and ambulatory BP between HIIT and MICT. Changes from pre- to post-intervention in maximal oxygen uptake (V˙\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\dot{V}$$\end{document}O2max) between HIIT and MICT were also meta-analyzed. Data were reported as weighted mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsAmbulatory BP was excluded from the meta-analysis due to the limited number of studies (two studies). Comparing changes from pre- to post-intervention, no differences in resting systolic BP (MD − 0.22 mmHg [CI 95%, − 5.36 to 4.92], p = 0.93, I2 = 53%) and diastolic BP (MD − 0.38 mmHg [CI 95%, − 3.31 to 2.54], p = 0.74, I2 = 0%) were found between HIIT and MICT (seven studies; 164 participants). HIIT improved V˙\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\dot{V}$$\end{document}O2max to a greater magnitude than MICT (MD 2.13 ml/kg/min [CI 95%, 1.00 to 3.27], p < 0.01, I2 = 41%) with similar completion rates of the intervention and attendance at the exercise training sessions (nine studies; 245 participants). Limited data were available to compare the incidence of adverse events between HIIT and MICT.ConclusionHIIT and MICT provided comparable reductions in resting BP in adults with pre- to established hypertension. HIIT was associated with greater improvements in V˙\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\dot{V}$$\end{document}O2max when compared to MICT. Future randomized trials should investigate the efficacy of HIIT versus MICT for reducing ambulatory BP in adults with pre- to established hypertension.RegistrationPROSPERO registration (2016: CRD42016041885).

Ambulatory blood pressure reduction following 2 weeks of high-intensity interval training on an immersed ergocycle

Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training On Blood Pressure in Adults with Pre- to Established Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Intermittent high-intensity exercise for pre- to established hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

AN ALTERNATIVE PROTOCOL TO IMPROVE ACCESSIBILITY TO ISOMETRIC EXERCISE TRAINING TO TREAT UNCOMPLICATED HYPERTENSION

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Blood Pressure, and Substrate Utilization During Exercise Among Prehypertensive and Hypertensive Patients With Excessive Adiposity

Acute high-intensity interval exercise versus moderate-intensity continuous exercise in heated water-based on hemodynamic, cardiac autonomic, and vascular responses in older individuals with hypertension

Effects of Exercise Interventions on Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity and Mean Arterial Pressure in Overweight Adults: The Role of Modality

Effects of high-intensity interval training on retinal vessel diameters and oxygen saturation in patients with hypertension: A cross-sectional and randomized controlled trial

Effects of different aerobic exercise programmes with nutritional intervention in sedentary adults with overweight/obesity and hypertension: EXERDIET-HTA study

Isometric Exercise and Blood Pressure: 12 Weeks of Training and Detraining in the Elderly

Effect of home‐based isometric training on blood pressure in older adults with high normal BP or stage I hypertension: A randomized controlled trial

Effects of Aerobic Exercise Intensity on Post-exercise Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Function in Prehypertensive Men in Their 30s

Short-term high-intensity interval training improves micro- but not macrovascular function in hypertensive patients

Isometric Exercise Training and Arterial Hypertension: An Updated Review

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Exercise Capacity, Blood Pressure, and Autonomic Responses in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: A meta-analysis

Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Body Composition and Blood Biomarkers in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

FEASIBILITY STUDY TO ASSESS THE DELIVERY OF A NOVEL ISOMETRIC EXERCISE INTERVENTION FOR PEOPLE WITH STAGE 1 HYPERTENSION

Clinical and physiological effects of high-intensity aerobic training on metabolic syndrome: understanding the individual exercise response variability

Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Central Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis