Long‐term electrocardiographic safety monitoring in clinical drug development: A report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium

J. Piccini,Richard L Clark,P. Kowey,S. Mittal,P. Dunnmon,N. Stockbridge,J. Reiffel,M. Turakhia,P. Ziegler,R. Kleiman,Fraz A. Ismat,P. Sager

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2017.01.012

IF: 5.099

2017-05-01

American Heart Journal

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Perioperative Outcomes Comparing Laparoscopic with Open Repeat Liver Resection for Post-Hepatectomy Recurrent Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yuelong Liang,Chengping Lin,Bin Zhang,Jiasheng Cao,Mingyu Chen,Jieliang Shen,Feng Xu,Guang-Yuan Xiao,Ping Long,Ke Chen,Hendi Maher,Xiujun Cai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.052

2020-01-01

International Journal of Surgery

Abstract:Repeat laparoscopic hepatectomy (LRH) offers an option for recurrent tumors in liver remnants following an initial liver resection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC), showing advantages in some outcomes. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential benefits of LRH in comparison with repeat open hepatectomy (ORH) for recurrent liver cancer.A systematic review was performed in compliance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify studies that compared LRH with ORH from inception to September 30, 2019. Outcomes of interest included operation time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, complication rate, transfusion and R0 resection rate. The protocol was registered with the PROSPERO register of systematic reviews.10 retrospective observational studies were suitable for this analysis, involving 767 patients with 334 undergoing LRH (43.5%) and 433 undergoing ORH (56.5%). Compared with ORH, LRH had less intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -1.03; 95% CI: 1.48~-0.59, P < 0.001), less overall postoperative complications (OR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.16-0.99, P = 0.048), less major complications (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15-0.62, P = 0.001), shorter hospital stay (SMD = -0.98; 95% CI: 1.41~-0.54, P < 0.001) and higher R0 resection rate (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.39-3.81, P = 0.001). It was comparable in operation time (WMD = -7.66; 95% CI: 52.50-37.19, P = 0.738), transfusion rate (OR = 0.33; 95% CI:0.11-1.05, P = 0.060), and mortality (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.27-2.18, P = 0.615) between LRH and ORH.Our results indicate that LRH is a safe and effective technique. Benefits, especially less intra-operative blood loss, less complications rate, shorter hospital stay and higher R0 resection, might be offered in the laparoscopic approach.
Laparoscopic radical resection for gallbladder cancer

陈晶云,丁国平,梁霄,沈波,曹利平

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn113855-20210817-00491

2022-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To investigate the feasibility and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy(LRC) for gallbladder cancer.Methods:The clinical data of 247 patients with gallbladder cancer who underwent radical resection from Jan 2013 to Dec 2019 at Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine was analyzed retrospectively. After propensity score matching, 54 patients were included in laparoscopic group and 103 in laparotomy group. The clinicopathological characteristics and the short- and long-term outcomes were compared.Results:Compared to the laparotomy group, patients in the laparoscopic group had less intraoperative blood loss [100(50,200)ml vs. 200(100,300) ml, Z=4.105, P<0.001], earlier postoperative oral diet[1.0(1.0,2.0) d vs. 2.0(1.0,4.0) d, Z=4.157, P<0.001]and drainage removal[6.5(4.0,12.5) d vs. 9.0(6.0,16.0) d, Z=2.769, P=0.006], shorter hospital stay[7.0(5.0,9.3) d vs. 9.0(8.0,14.0) d, Z=3.923, P<0.001]. The number of lymph node dissection in laparoscopic group was significantly lesser than that in open group [6(4,9) vs. 8(5,12), Z=2.639, P=0.008]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative complications, short-term and long-term survival outcomes. Conclusions:Laparoscopic radical surgery for gallbladder cancer is as safe and feasible, and identical survival prognosis as open surgery, and moreover a less traumatic procedure.
[Analysis for the short-term efficacy and long-term prognosis of laparoscopic and laparotomy radical resection for gallbladder cancer]

C W Dou,C X Zhang,J Liu,J Cheng,L M Jin,J W Liu,C W Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20210226-00099

2022-02-01

Abstract:Objective: To compare the short-term efficacy and long-term prognosis of laparoscopic and laparotomy radical resection for gallbladder cancer(GBC). Methods: From January 2010 to December 2020,the clinical data and survival information for 133 patients who underwent radical resection of GBC at the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery,Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital,were retrospectively collected. Eighty patients(23 males and 57 females) underwent laparoscopic radical resection and had a median age(M(IQR)) of 66.0(12.8)years(range:28.0 to 82.0 years). Fifty-three patients(45 males and 8 females) who received laparotomy were 63.0(6.0)years old(range:45.0 to 80.0 years old). There were no significant differences in age,gender,body mass index,preoperative albumin,preoperative total bilirubin,N stages,vascular invasion,peri-neural invasion or tumor differentiation between the laparoscopic and laparotomy group(all P>0.05). But there were significant differences in preoperative CA19-9(Z=-2.955, P=0.003), preoperative ALT level(Z=-2.801,P=0.031) and T stage (χ2=19.110,P=0.007) between the two groups. A non-parametric test was used for quantitative data. χ2 test or Fisher exact probability method was used for count data. Results: Patients in the laparoscopic group did not differ from those in the laparotomy group in terms of length of operation,number of lymph node yield,number of positive lymph nodes,the incidence of intraoperative gallbladder rupture,incidence of postoperative bile leakage,abdominal bleeding or abdominal infection,30-day mortality,90-day mortality, the incidence of incision implantation or peritoneal cavity metastasis(all P>0.05). Patients in the laparoscopic group showed less intraoperative bleeding(100.0(200.0)ml vs. 400.0(250.0)ml)(Z=-5.260,P<0.01),fewer days with drainage tube indwelling(6.0(3.8)days vs. 7.0(4.0)days)(Z=-3.351, P=0.001), and fewer postoperative days in hospital(8.0(5.0)days vs. 14.0(7.5)days)(Z=-6.079,P<0.01) than those in the laparotomy group. Patients in the laparoscopic group displayed better overall survival (P<0.01) and progression-free survival (P<0.01). Subgroup analysis for GBC of T1b-T2 and T3 stages revealed comparable overall survival and progression-free survival between the laparoscopic and laparotomy groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopic radical resection can achieve long-term survival for GBC comparable to that with open surgery. Laparoscopic radical resection has advantages over open surgery regarding surgical trauma and postoperative recovery.
Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Resection in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hanchu Xiong,Ji Wang,Yunlu Jia,Chenyang Ye,Yi Lu,Cong Chen,Jianguo Shen,Yongxia Chen,Wenhe Zhao,Linbo Wang,Jichun Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.042

2017-01-01

Abstract:Purposes: The contemporary surgery has reported the safety of laparoscopic surgery (LAP) for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, its use is still debated due to suspicion of the oncologic equivalence to open surgery (OPEN). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of updated original articles to investigate the short-and long-term clinical outcomes of LAP compared with OPEN for GISTs. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and CNKI. Comparative studies of laparoscopic and open surgery for GISTs were published before November 2016. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was utilized to conduct quality assessment. The Review Manager (RevMan) software version 5.0 was used for meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-four studies involving 2140 patients were included for the meta-analysis. The metaanalysis results showed that, compared with OPEN, LAP indicated potentially favorable outcomes in terms of operative time (WMD, -30.71; 95% CI, -58.48 to -2.95; P =0.03); intraoperative blood loss (WMD, -60.90; 95% CI, -91.53 to -30.28; P < 0.0001); time to flatus (WMD, -1.10; 95% CI, -1.41 to 0.79; P < 0.00001); time to oral intake (WMD, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.64 to 0.86; P < 0.00001); length of hospital stay (WMD, -3.42; 95% CI, -4.37 to -2.46; P < 0.00001); overall complications (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.54; P < 0.00001); and recurrence (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.66; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery is safe and feasible for the treatment of GISTs including less operative time and intraoperative blood loss, earlier postoperative recovery, shorter hospital stay, and lower rate of overall complications and recurrence. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Selection of Surgical Procedures for Gallbladder Cancer

PENG Shu-you,HONG De-fei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2011.02.003

2011-01-01

Abstract:Radical resection is still the only possible cure for gallbladder cancer nowadays. Rational procedures vary according to different TNM stages, locations and biological behavior of tumor. Diagnostic laparoscopic exploration offers the opportunity to identify peritoneal metastasis which may be negative on preoperative radiological findings. Besides, this can also minimize trauma to abdomen. Therefore, laparoscopic exploration is suggested in cases highly suspected of peritoneal metastasis. For incidental gallbladder cancer, radical surgery should be performed because of positive margin of cystic duct, inadequate trocar management or advanced tumor stages. Timing for reoperation is still controversial. Most scholars recommended that it should be proceed within two months after the first surgery.
A cerebellar abiotrophy of calves.

White Me,R. Whitlock,A. Lahunta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.89872

1975-10-01

Abstract:A postnatal cerebellar atazia of a type not previously reported in calves is described. Atazia was first noticed in affected animals when they were three to eight months of age, and was often accompanied by loss of the menace response in an animal which was not blind. The disorder was progressive. At postmortem cerebellar size was normal. Microscopic lesions consisted of primarily an apparent degeneration of cerebellar neurons without obvious evidence of inflammation. History, clinical signs, laboratory examination, gross pathology, histopathology, differential diagnosis, search for an etiologic agent and genetic histories are reported. It is concluded that this disorder may represent an hereditary cerebellar abiotrophy in Holstein cattle.
Deterioration in Quality of Life Following Hip Fracture: A Prospective Study

A. Randell,Tuan V. Nguyen,N. Bhalerao,S. Silverman,P. Sambrook,J. Eisman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980070115

Osteoporosis International

Abstract:
Laparoscopic versus open surgery in treating patients with gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Duo Li,Li Xu,Xiangling Deng,Yongliang Sun,Zihuan Zhang,Tianxiao Wang,Ruili Wei,Yingjixing Luo,Wenquan Niu,Zhiying Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-22-597

2024-06-01

Abstract:Background: Concerns over the security of laparoscopic radical operation for gallbladder cancer (GBC) persist. This systematic review and meta-analysis attempted to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LS) versus open surgery (OS) in the treatment of GBC. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 18, 2022. Literature search, quality assessment, and data extraction were completed independently and in duplicate. Effect-size estimates expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were derived under the random-effects model. Results: A total of 27 independent studies including 2,868 participants were meta-analyzed. Significance was noted for intraoperative blood loss (WMD: -117.194, 95% CI: -170.188 to 64.201, P<0.001), harvested lymph nodes (WMD: -1.023, 95% CI: -1.776 to -0.269, P=0.008), postoperative hospital stay (WMD: -3.555, 95% CI: -4.509 to -2.601, P<0.001), postoperative morbidity (OR: 0.596, 95% CI: 0.407 to 0.871, P=0.008), overall survival rate at 2-year (OR: 1.524, 95% CI: 1.143 to 2.031, P=0.004), T2 survival at 1-year (OR: 1.799, 95% CI: 1.777 to 2.749, P<0.01) and 2-year (OR: 2.026, 95% CI: 1.392 to 2.949, P<0.001), as well as T3 survival at 1-year (OR: 2.669, 95% CI: 1.564 to 4.555, P<0.001) and 2-year (OR: 2.300, 95% CI: 1.308 to 4.046, P=0.004). Subgroup analyses revealed that ethnicity, incidental GBC, sample size, and follow-up period were possible sources of heterogeneity. There was a low probability of publication bias for all outcomes except postoperative morbidity. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that LS statistically had better 2-year survival rates, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospitalization times, and lower rates of complications than OS. However, the superiority and even the safety of LS still remain an open question due to the impact of incidental GBC, unaccounted heterogeneity, publication bias, lymph node dissection, and port-site metastasis.
Polyadenylation of the Xenopus beta 1 globin mRNA at a downstream minor site in the absence of the major site and utilization of an AAUACA polyadenylation signal.

P. Mason,M. B. Jones,J. A. Elkington,J. Williams

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb02337.x

1985-01-01

Abstract:We show that adult reticulocytes of Xenopus laevis produce two forms of the beta 1 globin mRNA that differ in their site of polyadenylation. The minor site of polyadenylation is located 46 nucleotides downstream of the major site and is used in approximately 1% of mRNA molecules. A fusion gene was constructed containing the promoter from the thymidine kinase gene of herpes simplex virus fused to the protein coding, 3′‐noncoding and 3′‐flanking sequences of the X. laevis beta 1 globin gene. When injected into the nuclei of Xenopus oocytes, transcripts of this fusion gene were accurately and efficiently spliced and polyadenylated. The proportion of fusion gene transcripts terminating at the major and minor polyadenylation sites after injection into oocytes was approximately similar to that found in reticulocytes. When the AATAAA sequence element upstream from the major site was deleted, the minor site was used with a high (greater than 90%) efficiency. Therefore, by comparing the ratio of polyadenylation at the major and minor sites, it is possible to determine the effect of sequence alterations at the major site. In a construct where the AATAAA polyadenylation signal was changed to AATACA a high proportion (35%) of transcripts continued to be polyadenylated at the major site. This suggests a surprisingly high degree of flexibility in the precise polyadenylation signal.
Laparoscopic surgery for oncologic extended resection of T1b and T2 incidental gallbladder carcinoma at a high-volume center: a single-center experience in China

Parbatraj Regmi,Hai-Jie Hu,Yin Chang-Hao,Fei Liu,Wen-Jie Ma,Cong-Dun Ran,Jun-Ke Wang,Aliza Paudyal,Nan-Sheng Cheng,Fu-Yu Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08146-7

Abstract:Background: Surgical treatment is still the most effective treatment for gallbladder cancer. For the patients with stage T1b and above, the current guidelines recommend the extended radical operation, and oncologic extended resection can benefit the survival of the patients. The laparoscopic approach is still in the early phase, and its safety and oncological outcomes are not well known. Objective: To evaluate the technical feasibility and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for oncologic extended resection of early-stage incidental gallbladder carcinoma. Results: This study included 18 male and 32 female patients. Twenty patients underwent laparoscopic oncologic extended resection and 30 patients underwent open oncologic extended resection. All of the patients had R0 resection. A laparoscopic approach was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (242 ± 108.5 vs 401 ± 130.3; p < 0.01) and shorter duration of postoperative hospital stay (6.2 ± 2.4 vs 8.6 ± 2.3; p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between two groups for lymph nodes yield (5.4 ± 3.5 vs 5.8 ± 2.1; p > 0.05), incidence of lymphatic metastasis (15% vs 16.67%; p > 0.05), residual disease (20% vs 23.3%; p > 0.05), and postoperative morbidity (15% vs 20%; p > 0.05). During follow-up time of median 20.95 (12-29.5) months, no significant difference was found between the two groups for early tumor recurrence (10% vs 13.33%; p > 0.05) and disease-free survival (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery may offer similar intraoperative, perioperative, and short-term oncological outcomes as an open oncologic extended resection for incidental gallbladder carcinoma.
Propensity Score Analysis of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic or Open Radical Resection for Gallbladder Cancer in T2 and T3 Stages

Changwei Dou,Chunxu Zhang,Chengwu Zhang,Jie Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05288-y

Abstract:Background: Although laparoscopic radical resection (LRR) has long been contraindicated in gallbladder cancer (GBC), recent studies have demonstrated laparoscopic surgery did not adversely affect the perioperative and survival outcomes of GBC patients. However, these literatures are mainly focused on GBC of relatively early stages or incidental GBC. This study aimed to investigate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of LRR versus open radical resection (ORR) for GBCs in T2 and T3 stages. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 99 patients with GBC of T2 and T3 stages who underwent radical resection at Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from January 2010 to December 2020. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), which is widely used to reduce selection bias, was performed to compare the surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis between LRR and ORR. A logistic regression analysis was implemented to identify the predictive risk factors of postoperative overall survival. Results: By using PSM, the baseline characteristics of two groups (with 30 patients in each group) were generally well balanced. In the LRR group, the length of operation was significantly longer than the ORR group, but the intraoperative bleeding and postoperative days of hospital stay were significantly decreased compared to the ORR group. The two groups showed comparable outcomes regarding the incidence of biliary reconstruction, lymph node yield, the incidence of postoperative morbidities, the incidence of Clavien-Dindo (C-D) grades III-IV, the days of drainage tubes indwelling, mortality at 30 postoperative days and 90 postoperative days, and the incidence of port-site metastasis. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 61.2, 40.1, and 30.1%, respectively, in the LRR group, and 53.3, 40.1, and 40.1%, respectively, in the OLR group (P = 0.644). On multivariate analysis, T stage, vascular invasion, and tumor differentiation were found to be the independent risk factors for overall survival of GBC in T2 and T3 stages. Conclusions: For GBC in T2 and T3 stages, LRR can achieve comparable perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival benefit compared to ORR. LRR tends to show advantages over ORR regarding intraoperative bleeding and postoperative days of hospital stay.
Laparoscopic versus open treatment of gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xin Zhao,Xiang Yang Li,Wu Ji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_223_16

2018-01-01

Journal of Minimal Access Surgery

Abstract:Background: The aim of this review was to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic surgery on the treatment of patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC). Methods: A comprehensive search of Medline and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify relevant articles. A meta-analysis was subsequently performed. Results: A total of 20 studies including 1217 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that the 5-year survival rate was significant higher in laparoscopic group than open group (48.4% vs. 38.5%; odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-2.19; P = 0.001). Although the scar recurrence rate was significant higher in laparoscopic group than open group (7.1% vs. 4.0%; OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.11-3.96; P = 0.02), the overall recurrence rates between two groups were not significant different (44.8% vs. 42.2%; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64-1.14; P = 0.29). In addition, compared with open extended cholecystectomy (EC), laparoscopic EC (LEC) was associated with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter post-operative hospital stays and insignificant less complication rate (10.0% vs. 18.3%; OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.15-1.73; P = 0.28). Conclusion: Laparoscopic simple cholecystectomy does not lead to a worse prognosis when applied on patients with GBC. LEC can be performed in specialised expert centres on elective patients.
Laparoscopic Surgery for Early Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Xu Feng,Jia-Sheng Cao,Ming-Yu Chen,Bin Zhang,Sarun Juengpanich,Jia-Hao Hu,Win Topatana,Shi-Jie Li,Ji-Liang Shen,Guang-Yuan Xiao,Xiu-Jun Cai,Hong Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i6.1074

2020-01-01

World Journal of Clinical Cases

Abstract:BACKGROUND There is a controversy as to whether laparoscopic surgery leads to a poor prognosis compared to the open approach for early gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). We hypothesized that the laparoscopic approach is an alternative for early GBC. AIM To identify and evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of early GBC. METHODS A comprehensive search of online databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane libraries, and Web of Science, was performed to identify non-comparative studies reporting the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and comparative studies involving laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in early GBC from January 2009 to October 2019. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed for 1- and 5-year overall survival and postoperative complications, while 3-year overall survival, operation time, blood loss, the number of lymph node dissected, and postoperative hospital stay were analyzed by random-effects models. RESULTS The review identified 7 comparative studies and 8 non-comparative studies. 1068 patients (laparoscopic surgery: 613; open surgery: 455) were included in the meta-analysis of 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival with no significant differences observed [(HR = 0.54; 95%CI: 0.29-1.00; I2 = 0.0%; P = 0.051), (HR = 0.75; 95%CI: 0.34-1.65; I2 = 60.7%; P = 0.474), (HR = 0.71; 95%CI: 0.47-1.08; I2 = 49.6%; P = 0.107), respectively]. There were no significant differences in operation time [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 18.69; 95%CI: −19.98-57.36; I2 = 81.4%; P = 0.343], intraoperative blood loss (WMD = −169.14; 95%CI: −377.86-39.57; I2 = 89.5%; P = 0.112), the number of lymph nodes resected (WMD = 0.12; 95%CI: −2.95-3.18; I2 = 73.4%; P = 0.940), and the complication rate (OR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.30-1.58; I2 = 0.0%; P = 0.377 ) between the two groups, while patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had a reduced length of hospital stay (WMD = −5.09; 95%CI: −8.74- −1.45; I2 = 91.0%; P= 0.006). CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis confirms that laparoscopic surgery is a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery with comparable survival and operation-related outcomes for early GBC.
Single-laboratory validation for the quantification of neomycin B and neomycin C in animal feeds by liquid chromatography fluorescence detection with post-column derivatization.

J. L. Driver,N. Thiex,D. Raynie,M. Ofitserova,M. Pickering

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/JAOAC/92.1.34

Journal of AOAC International

Abstract:A method using ion-exchange liquid chromatographic (LC) separation, post-column derivatization, and fluorescence detection to quantify neomycin B and neomycin C in animal feeds has been developed and validated. Improved methodology is required to achieve positive identification of antibiotics present and to more accurately determine the amount of antibiotics in feeds. The method sample range covers additive levels found in type A, B, and C medicated feed products (50-0.005% wt/wt neomycin base). The linear range for the method covers 50-150% of expected sample concentrations. Average recovery from type A and B feeds, n = 9, was 100.4% neomycin with %RSD = 2.28. Average recovery from type C feeds and milk replacers, n = 9, was 97.5% neomycin with %RSD = 4.36. There were no interferences from soybean meal and milk replacer matrix components, oxytetracycline, or other aminoglycosides, with the exception of one gentamicin isomer, which co-elutes with neomycin B. However, neomycin and gentamicin are not a legal feed combination, and the presence of gentamicin can easily be discerned by the appearance of the 3 gentamicin homologs that do not interfere. Comparison of the proposed LC method to the microbiological method shows that the LC method provides comparable recoveries of neomycin from feed products throughout the range of concentrations found commercially.
Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Qi-Long Chen,Yu Pan,Jia-Qin Cai,Di Wu,Ke Chen,Yi-Ping Mou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-206

2014-01-01

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Abstract:Background In past decades, laparoscopic surgery has been introduced for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Recently, additional studies comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery for gastric GISTs have been published, and an updated meta-analysis of this subject is necessary. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Comparative studies of laparoscopic and open surgery for gastric GISTs published before June 2014 were identified from databases. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to perform quality assessment and original data were extracted. The statistical software STATA (version 12.0) was used for the meta-analysis. Results Finally, 22 studies, including a total of 1,166 cases, meet the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The operation time was similar between laparoscopic and open surgery. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic resection was associated withless blood loss (WMD = -58.91 ml; 95% CI, -84.60 to -33.22 ml; P <0.01); earlier time to flatus (WMD = -1.31 d; 95% CI, -1.56 to -1.06, P <0.01) and oral diet (WMD = -1.75 d; 95% CI, -2.12 to -1.39; P <0.01); shorter hospital stay (WMD = -3.68 d; 95% CI, -4.47 to -2.88; P <0.01); and decreased overall complications (relative risk = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.89; P = 0.01). For long-term outcomes, there were no significant differences between two surgical procedures on recurrence. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery for gastric GISTs is acceptable for selective patients with better short-term outcomes compared with open surgery. The long-term survival situation of patients mainly depends on the nature of tumor itself, and laparoscopic surgery was not associated with worse oncological outcomes.
Laparoscopic Radical Cholecystectomy Vs Open Surgery for T2 Gallbladder Cancer

Zhang Lingfu,Hou Chunsheng,Xu Zhi,Guo Limei,Tao Liyuan,Ling Xiaofeng,Wang Lixin,Xiu Dianrong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631x.2017.05.004

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy for T2 gallbladder cancers.Methods A retrospective analysis was made on 44 patients with pathology confirmed T2 gallbladder cancer undergoing laparoscopic vs open radical cholecystectomy.The clinicopathological and follow-up data were compared.Results Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 32 patients,the implantation metastasis rate of this approach has no statistical differences compared with the open cholecystectomy (P =1.000).26 patients underwent laparoscopic radical resection and the remaining 18 patients underwent open radical resection.There was no statistical difference in operation time (P =0.953),blood loss (P =0.193)and postoperative complications (P =1.000),but the laparoscopic radical resection group is superior to the open group on postoperative pain grading (P =0.022),ambulation time (P =0.000),nothing per mouth time (P =0.000) and length of hospital stay (P =0.048).The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved was 5 ±4 (range 1-12) in the laparoscopic radical group and 6 ± 3 (range 1-12) in the open group (P =0.983);the 1,3,5 year survival rates was 92.3％,70.3％,61.5％ and 92.3％,76.3％,69.3％,respectively(P =0.473).Conclusions Initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not increase the rate of seeding metastasis in the context of intact gallbladder carcinoma.Totall laparoscopic radical resection is feasible in selected T2 gallbladder cancer patients.
Total laparoscopic versus open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Yuhua Zhang,Changwei Dou,Weiding Wu,Jie Liu,Liming Jin,Zhiming Hu,Chengwu Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07211-0

Abstract:Background: Radical resection is the only curative option for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) to achieve long-term survival. However, due to the fact that radical resection of HCCA has high technical requirements, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic resection for HCCA remains controversial. Method: From January 2015 to December 2018, 23 cases of HCCA underwent radical resection in our center. Clinical data of those patients were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Results: 14 patients underwent laparoscopic resection and 9 cases received open resection. 2 patients in laparoscopic group were converted to laparotomy. Operation time in laparoscopic group was significantly longer than that in open group (519.4 ± 155.4 min vs 366.7 ± 93.1 min). Estimated blood loss (620.0 ± 681.2 ml vs 821.4 ± 713.8 ml) and incidence of intraoperative blood transfusion (5/9 vs 8/14) did not differ significantly between two groups. Pathological outcomes were comparable between two groups. Length of postoperative hospital stay (23.4 ± 13.4 days vs 17.8 ± 7.1 days), severe postoperative morbidity (3/9 vs 5/14), bile leakage of Grade A or B (5/9 vs 5/14), intra-abdominal bleeding (0/9 vs 1/14), intra-abdominal abscess (1/9 vs 0/14), wound infection (0/9 vs 1/14), pulmonary infection (2/9 vs 0/14), and liver failure (0/9 vs 0/14) did not differ significantly between two groups. One patient in laparoscopic group died (1/14) at 21 postoperative days due to intra-abdominal bleeding, while no 30-day mortality was observed in open group. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that laparoscopic radical resection of HCCA is safe and feasible in experienced hands. Although laparoscopic resection for HCCA, which is still in initial and exploratory stage, fails to show any advantage over open resection in this study, we are optimistic with its wide application in future with the improvement of surgical techniques and experience.
Laparoscopic Vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China

Zhen Yuan,Dongyan Cao,Jie Yang,Mei Yu,Keng Shen,Jiaxin Yang,Ying Zhang,Huimei Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01107

IF: 4.7

2019-01-01

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:Study Objective: To compare the surgical and oncologic outcomes between open abdomen radical hysterectomy (ARH) and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for cervical cancer. Methods: Retrospective observational study with propensity score matching was used to ensure balanced groups for ARH and LRH. One-hundred-and-ninety-eight women with cervical cancer, 99 treated using ARH and 99 using LRH, between January 2012 and December 2014. Outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), intra-operative factors, post-operator recovery, urinary retention, and adverse events. Moreover, the inverse probability of the treatment weighting (IPTW) method was also used. Main Results: Compared with ARH, LRH was associated with a lower volume of blood loss (P < 0.001) and transfusion rate (P < 0.001), with a broader resection of the parametrium (P < 0.001). Post-operatively, the time to first flatus was shorter for LRH than ARH (P < 0.001) but the rate of urinary retention was higher for LRH (22.2%) than ARH (8.1%; P = 0.009). DFS and OS were similar between groups. By IPTW, laparoscopy was also not associated with poorer survival in terms of DFS (HR 1.52, CI 0.799-2.891, P = 0.202) or OS (HR 0.942, HR 0.425-2.09, P = 0.883). Conclusion: Compared with ARH, LRH provided better intra-operative and post-operative outcomes, with no significant difference in oncologic outcomes and survival. Urinary retention remains a clinical issue to improve with LRH. The technology of LRH has been improved in China to address the inconsistent results of oncologic outcomes in previous studies. Whether these improvements could be effective needs to be investigated in the future.
Comparison of different surgical treatments for early-stage gallbladder cancer

Gang WANG,Longhui ZHANG,Changkun ZHANG,Jiye ZHU,Xisheng LENG,Dong WANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7507/1007-9424.201704032

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of different surgical methods in the treatment of early-stage gallbladder carcinoma (GBC).Methods The clinical data of 43 patients with early-stage GBC who received treatment in Peking University People's Hospital from Jan.2010 to Dec.2016 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the surgical methods,the patients were divided into laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)+lymph node dissection (LND)+radiofrequency ablation (RA) group,open cholecystectomy (OC)+LND+RA group,and OC+LND+liver resection (LA) group.Operation duration,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,surgical complications,and long-term survival were compared among the 3 groups.Results All the 43 patients performed successful surgery without perioperative death.① Operation duration and postoperative hospital stay.The differences of operation duration and postoperative hospital stay among the 3 groups were statistically significant (P＜0.05).Comparedwith the LC+LND+RA group,operation duration and postoperative hospital stay of the OC+LND+RA group and the OC+LND+LR group were longer (P＜0.017),but there was no statistically significant difference between the OC+LND+RA group and the OC+LND+LR group (P＞0.017).② Intraoperative blood loss.The difference of intraoperative blood loss among the 3 groups was statistically significant (P＜0.001).Compared with the OC+LND+LR group,the intraoperative blood loss was lower in the LC+LND+RA group and the OC+LND+RA group (P＜0.017),but there was no significant difference between the LC+LND+RA group and the OC+LND+RA group (P=0.172).③ Postoperative complications.There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications among the 3 groups (P=0.326).④ Long-term survival.There was no significant difference in survival curves among the 3 groups (P=0.057).Conclusions The method of cholecystectomy combined with LND and RA of gallbladder bed can achieve the radical effect on early-stage GBC (Tis-T2).Laparoscopic surgery,in particular,has shorter operation duration and faster recovery.
Expression of class II-MHC antigens in the dermis of patients with progressive systemic sclerosis.

Matthias S. Gruschwitz,Norbert Sepp,Heinz Kofler,Georg Wick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0171-2985(11)80660-1

IF: 3.152

1991-06-01

Immunobiology

Abstract:

Long‐term electrocardiographic safety monitoring in clinical drug development: A report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium

Perioperative Outcomes Comparing Laparoscopic with Open Repeat Liver Resection for Post-Hepatectomy Recurrent Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic radical resection for gallbladder cancer

[Analysis for the short-term efficacy and long-term prognosis of laparoscopic and laparotomy radical resection for gallbladder cancer]

Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Resection in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Selection of Surgical Procedures for Gallbladder Cancer

A cerebellar abiotrophy of calves.

Deterioration in Quality of Life Following Hip Fracture: A Prospective Study

Laparoscopic versus open surgery in treating patients with gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Polyadenylation of the Xenopus beta 1 globin mRNA at a downstream minor site in the absence of the major site and utilization of an AAUACA polyadenylation signal.

Laparoscopic surgery for oncologic extended resection of T1b and T2 incidental gallbladder carcinoma at a high-volume center: a single-center experience in China

Propensity Score Analysis of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic or Open Radical Resection for Gallbladder Cancer in T2 and T3 Stages

Laparoscopic versus open treatment of gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laparoscopic Surgery for Early Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Single-laboratory validation for the quantification of neomycin B and neomycin C in animal feeds by liquid chromatography fluorescence detection with post-column derivatization.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic Radical Cholecystectomy Vs Open Surgery for T2 Gallbladder Cancer

Total laparoscopic versus open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Laparoscopic Vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China

Comparison of different surgical treatments for early-stage gallbladder cancer

Expression of class II-MHC antigens in the dermis of patients with progressive systemic sclerosis.