Abstract:Hyperopia in infancy requires accommodative effort to bring images into focus. Prolonged accommodative effort has been associated with an increased risk of strabismus. Strabismus may result in asthenopia and intermittent diplopia, and makes near work tasks difficult to complete. Spectacles to correct hyperopic refractive error is believed to prevent the development of strabismus. To assess the effectiveness of prescription spectacles compared with no intervention for the prevention of strabismus in infants and children with hyperopia. We searched CENTRAL (2018, Issue 12; which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; three other databases; and two trial registries. We used no date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 4 December 2018. We included randomized controlled trials and quasi‐randomized trials investigating spectacle intervention or no treatment for children with hyperopia. We required hyperopia to be at least greater than +2.00 diopters (D). We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. The primary outcome was the proportion of children with manifest strabismus, as defined by study investigators. Other outcomes included the amblyopia, stereoacuity, and the effect of spectacle use of strabismus and visual acuity. We also collected information on change in refractive error as a measurement of the interference of emmetropization. We identified four randomized controlled trials (985 children enrolled who were aged six months to less than 36 months) in this review. Three trials were in the UK with follow‐up periods ranging from one to 3.5 years and one in the US with three years' follow‐up. Investigators reported both incidence and final status regarding strabismus. Evidence of the incidence of strabismus, measured in 804 children over three to four years in four trials was uncertain although suggestive of a benefit with spectacle use (risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 1.02). We have very low confidence in these results due to high risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. When assessed as the proportion of children with strabismus at the end of three years' follow‐up, we found a similar level of evidence for an effect of spectacles on strabismus as reported in one study (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.31 to 3.25; 106 children). We have very low confidence in these results because of low sample size and risk of bias. One trial reported on the risk for developing amblyopia and inadequate stereoacuity after three years in 106 children. There was unclear evidence for a decreased risk of developing amblyopia (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.93), and limited evidence for a benefit of spectacles for prevention of inadequate stereoacuity (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.88). We have very low confidence in these findings due to imprecision and risk of bias. The risk of not developing emmetropization is unclear. One trial reported on the proportion of children not achieving emmetropization at three years' follow‐up (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.19). One trial suggested spectacles impede emmetropization, and one trial reported no difference. These two trials could not be combined because the methods for assessing emmetropization were different. With the high risk of bias and inconsistency, the certainty of evidence for a risk for impeding or benefiting emmetropization is very low. Based on a meta‐analysis of four trials (770 children), the risk of having visual acuity worse than 20/30 measured up to three years of age or at the end of three years of follow‐up was uncertain for children with spectacle correction compared with those without correction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.18; very low confidence due to risk of bias and imprecision). The effect of spectacle correction for prevention of strabismus is still unclear. In addition, the use of spectacle on the risk of visual acuity worse than 20/30, amblyopia, and inadequate emmetropization is also unclear. There may be a benefit on prevention of inadequate stereoacuity. However, these effects may have been chance findings or due to bias. What was the aim of this review? To find out if wearing eyeglasses by far‐sighted children will prevent crossed eyes (strabismus) and associated effects from developing. Key messages The evidence does not currently support the conclusion that eyeglasses prevent strabismus in far‐sighted children, or that wearing glasses prevents lazy‐eye (amblyopia). This evidence was limited due to some parts of the studies not being done as well as they could and small number of study participants. What was studied in the review? Infants typically are born far‐sighted, meaning they only have clear vision at distance. As children grow, their eyes also grow to where they can see clearly at both near and far distances. About 9% of chi -Abstract Truncated-

Eye Conditions in Infants and Children: Myopia and Hyperopia

Eye Conditions in Infants and Children: Amblyopia and Strabismus

IMI-Management and Investigation of High Myopia in Infants and Young Children

Juvenile myopia progression, risk factors and interventions

Refractive Error's Distribution and Clinical Characteristics of Preterm and Full-term Children

Amblyopia, Strabismus and Refractive Errors in Congenital Ptosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Myopia and Strabismus in Children

Early Detection of Refractive Errors by Photorefraction at School Age

Retinal dysfunction and refractive errors: an electrophysiological study of children

Optics of spectacle lenses intended to treat myopia progression

Refractive errors, amblyopia risk factors and vision screening in children aged 7-10 years in Aotearoa New Zealand

Review of Risk Factors and Intervention of Myopia in Children and Adolescents

Spectacle correction versus no spectacles for prevention of strabismus in hyperopic children.

High myopia: Reviews of myopia control strategies and myopia complications

Myopia, what causes it and can it be avoided?

Epidemiology of Myopia

Myopia control: Seeing beyond efficacy

Prevention of Myopia Progression in Children and Adolescents

Estimation of the Prevalence of Uncorrected Refractive Error and Other Ocular Morbid Conditions in School Children of Industrial Area in a Non-metro City in India

Vision Needs of Children Who Failed School-based Vision Screening with and without Eyeglasses

Prevalence of refractive errors among school-going children in a multistate study in India