Abstract:During a bacterial infection or colonization, the detection of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is critical, but slow due to culture-based approaches for clinical and screening samples. Culture-based phenotypic AMR detection and confirmation require up to 72 hours (h) or even weeks for slow-growing bacteria. Direct shotgun metagenomics by long-read sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) may reduce the time for bacterial species and AMR gene identification. However, screening swabs for metagenomics is complex due to the range of Gram-negative and -positive bacteria, diverse AMR genes, and host DNA present in the samples. Therefore, DNA extraction is a critical initial step. We aimed to compare the performance of different DNA extraction protocols for ONT applications to reliably identify species and AMR genes using a shotgun long-read metagenomic approach. We included three different sample types: ZymoBIOMICS Microbial Community Standard, an in-house mock community of ESKAPE pathogens including Enterococcus faecium , Staphylococcus aureus , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Acinetobacter baumannii , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Escherichia coli ( ESKAPE Mock ) , and anonymized clinical swab samples. We processed all sample types with four different DNA extraction kits utilizing different lysis (enzymatic vs. mechanical) and purification (spin-column vs. magnetic beads) methods. We used kits from Qiagen (QIAamp DNA Mini and QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA) and Promega (Maxwell RSC Cultured Cells and Maxwell RSC Buccal Swab DNA). After extraction, samples were subject to the Rapid Barcoding Kit (RBK004) for library preparation followed by sequencing on the GridION with R9.4.1 flow cells. The fast5 files were base called to fastq files using Guppy in High Accuracy (HAC) mode with the inbuilt MinKNOW software. Raw read quality was assessed using NanoPlot and human reads were removed using Minimap2 alignment against the Hg38 genome. Taxonomy identification was performed on the raw reads using Kraken2 and on assembled contigs using Minimap2. The AMR genes were identified using Minimap2 with alignment against the CARD database on both the raw reads and assembled contigs. We identified all bacterial species present in the Zymo Mock Community (8/8) and ESKAPE Mock (6/6) with Qiagen PowerFecal Pro DNA kit (chemical and mechanical lysis) at read and assembly levels. Enzymatic lysis retrieved fewer aligned bases for the Gram-positive species ( Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium ) from the ESKAPE Mock on the assembly level compared to the mechanical lysis. We detected the AMR genes from Gram-negative and -positive species in the ESKAPE Mock with the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA kit on reads level with a maximum median time of 1.9 h of sequencing. Long-read metagenomics with ONT may reduce the turnaround time in screening for AMR genes. Currently, the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA kit (chemical and mechanical lysis) for DNA extraction along with the Rapid Barcoding Kit for the ONT sequencing captured the best taxonomy and AMR identification for our specific use case.

Relative Performance of MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) versus Sequel (Pacific Biosciences) Third-Generation Sequencing Instruments in Identification of Agricultural and Forest Fungal Pathogens

Evaluation of Oxford Nanopore’s MinION Sequencing Device for Microbial Whole Genome Sequencing Applications

Microbiome-based environmental monitoring of a dairy processing facility highlights the challenges associated with low microbial-load samples

Early assessment of fungal and oomycete pathogens in greenhouse irrigation water using Oxford nanopore amplicon sequencing

Systematic Comparison of Nanopore and Illumina Sequencing for the Detection of Plant Viruses and Viroids Using Total RNA Sequencing Approach

Diagnosis of plant diseases using the Nanopore sequencing platform

RAPiD: a rapid and accurate plant pathogen identification pipeline for on-site nanopore sequencing

Early insights into the potential of the Oxford Nanopore MinION for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes

Targeting the 16S rRNA Gene for Bacterial Identification in Complex Mixed Samples: Comparative Evaluation of Second (Illumina) and Third (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) Generation Sequencing Technologies

Fast Identification Method for Screening Bacteria from Faecal Samples Using Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION Sequencing

A preliminary study on the potential of Nanopore MinION and Illumina MiSeq 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize building-dust microbiomes

Closing the gap: Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10 sequencing allows comparable results to Illumina sequencing for SNP-based outbreak investigation of bacterial pathogens

The Oxford Nanopore MinION as a Versatile Technology for the Diagnosis and Characterization of Emerging Plant Viruses

Evaluation of Oxford Nanopore MinIONTM Sequencing for 16S rRNA Microbiome Characterization

The Future of Livestock Management: A Review of Real-Time Portable Sequencing Applied to Livestock

Evaluation of DNA extraction kits for long-read shotgun metagenomics using Oxford Nanopore sequencing for rapid taxonomic and antimicrobial resistance detection

Next-generation fungal identification using target enrichment and Nanopore sequencing

Development of an efficient antimicrobial susceptibility testing method with species identification by Nanopore sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons

Rapid identification, capsular typing and molecular characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae by using whole genome nanopore sequencing

Performance evaluation of whole genome metagenomics sequencing with the MinION nanopore sequencer: Microbial community analysis and antimicrobial resistance gene detection

Evaluation of a nanopore sequencing strategy on bacterial communities from marine sediments