Title Tunable white light emission by variation of compositionand defects of electrospun Al 2 O 3-SiO 2 nanofibers
Jinyuan Zhou,Gengzhi Sun,Hao Zhao,Xiaojun Pan,Zhenxing Zhang,Yujun Fu,Y. Mao,E. Xie
Abstract:Composite nanofibers consisting of Al2O3–SiO2 were prepared by electrospinning in combination with post-calcination in air. X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy were used to investigate the crystalline phase and microstructure of the composite nanofibers. Photoluminescence experiments indicated that the resulting white light emission can be tuned by the relative intensity of the individual spectral components, which are related to the individual defects such as: violet-blue emission from O defects, green emission from ≡Si(Al)–O–C∙=O, and red emission from intersystem radiative crossing. White light emission was realized at a Al/(Al–Si) ratio of 40 and 60 mol %. This research may offer a deeper understanding of the preparation of efficient and environmentally friendly, white luminescence materials. Introduction During the last decade, nanoscale SiO2 has been intensely investigated as a new silicon-based light-emitting material. Its wide photoluminescence (PL) band ranges from the UV to red wavelengths, allowing for potential application in white light emission devices. It has been demonstrated that the luminescence emission and emission intensity of SiO2 nanostructures are strongly dependent upon the intrinsic structural defects and extrinsic environmental influences introduced during the preparation processes, which can be effectively tuned and controlled by doping [1-4]. Thus far, in order to achieve enhanced and stable light emission, various materials have been incorporated into a SiO2 matrix, such as Si nanocrystals, carbon nanocomposites, ZnO, Al2O3, SnO2, and various rare-earth elements [5-9]. Among those materials, Al2O3 is one of the most important materials in the history of ceramics, and has been extensively applied in catalysts, coatings, microelectronics and various Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 313–320. 314 devices, due to its excellent physical and chemical stability, high dielectric constant, wide band gap energy, and relatively high refractive index [10]. Similar to SiO2, Al2O3 is inexpensive and environmentally friendly, as well as highly compatible with the current integrated circuit processes. It has been demonstrated that the PL properties of SiO2/Al2O3 composites are more suitable than those of pure SiO2 or Al2O3 [11-15]. For example, Hayakawa et al. reported on the PL properties of 10Al2O3–90SiO2 glasses annealed at 500 °C, and found two emission peaks at 420 and 520 nm, which are assigned to the point defects of oxygen deficiencies and the radical carbonyl defect (≡Si(Al)–O–C∙=O) formed on the pore surface [16]. Mir et al. incorporated 30 nm, Al2O3 nanocrystals into silica aerogels, followed by calcination at 1150 °C in air for 2 h. The resulting 1Al2O3–3SiO2 composites exhibited strong, visible PL bands ranging from 400 to 600 nm centered at ≈500 nm, which were assigned to OH-related radiative emission centers formed in the samples [11]. Additionally, Yoldas also showed that the A12O3–SiO2 composites respond to UV light by emission of strong, visible luminescence (400–700 nm), which is due to the (≡Si–O ̈O–Si≡) radiative centers [17]. Chen et al. reported a peapod-like heterostructure composed of SiOx particles orderly embedded in the highly crystalline α-Al2O3 nanoribbons. They observed a strong and stable blue emission centered at 467 nm under excitation at 320 nm, which was attributed to the neutral oxygen vacancies (≡Si–Si≡) in the SiOx–Al2O3 heterostructure [18]. More recently, Korsunska et al. have investigated the PL behaviors of Si-rich Al2O3 films annealed at 1150 °C and observed intense emission in the visible spectral range from 575 to 600 nm, which is ascribed to defects in the matrix located near the nanocrystal/matrix interface [13-15,19]. From the above referenced work, it can be seen that the mechanism of this defect-dominant PL still remains ambiguous, and it is also a challenge to obtain the desired white luminescent material by control the different defects. Moreover, to date, few studies have reported on Al2O3–SiO2 nanocomposites. Thus, it is important and instructive to further explore the preparation and PL properties of these environmentally friendly, Al2O3–SiO2 nanomaterials. In this work, Al2O3–SiO2 composite nanofibers with different Al/(Al–Si) ratios were prepared by electrospinning in combination with calcination in air. Strong light emission was observed from the Al2O3–SiO2 hetero-nanofibers with tunable emission from bluish-white to yellow-white. The possible origins of each PL band in this composite nanofiber were also discussed. Results and Discussion Crystalline structures Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the samples with different Al/(Al–Si) ratios annealed at 1200 °C in air. The diffraction peaks from pure SiO2 are located at 21.9°, 28.5°, and 36.2°, which can be assigned to the <101>, <111>, and <200> crystalline plane of cristobalite (ICDD No. 39-1425), respectively [20,21]. The diffraction peaks of pure Al2O3 are located at 25.4°, 34.92° , 43.16°, 52.36° , and 57.30°,which can be assigned to the <012>, <104>, <110>, <113>, <024>, and <110> crystalline plane of α-Al2O3 (ICDD No. 46-1212), respectively [22]. Once the Al2O3 components are mixed with SiO2, the mullite formation reaction in diphasic gels takes place between amorphous silica and transition alumina during calcination. It can be seen from the typical mullite XRD line from Si6Al4 samples that the diffraction peaks located at 16.51°, 26.25°, 31.05°, 33.23°, 35.27°, 37.05°, 39.25°, 40.86°, 42.65°, 49.55°, 54.09°, and 57.58° can be assigned to the <100>, <210>, <001>, <220>, <111>, <130>, <201>, <121>, <230>, <311>, <321>, and <041> crystalline planes of mullite (ICDD No. 15-0776), respectively [23,24]. It is also noted that the diffraction peaks from mullite located at 26.25° are clearly split into two peaks, <120> and <210>, which is due to the fast heating process during the calcination of Al2O3–SiO2 gels [25]. Figure 1: XRD patterns of the obtained composite nanofibers with different Al/(Al–Si) ratios. Furthermore, a diffraction peak is located at approximately 22°, corresponding to the <101> of cristobalite, which indicates that crystalline silica phases are present in the diphasic gels during heating, while α-Al2O3 phases can barely be detected. Wei et al. found that A12O3 or cristobalite residue is formed in a Al2O3rich or SO2-rich, mullite specimen if the A12O3 content of the sample is not maintained between 60 and 66 mol % [26]. In our case, the mole percent of Al2O3 in the diphasic gels ranges from 11 mol % to 66 mol %, that is, most of our diphasic gels are silica-rich, except Al8Si2. The cristobalite residues in the Al-rich Al8Si2 samples might be caused by Si contamination from the silicon substrates used during high-temperature calcination. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 313–320. 315 Morphology and microstructure Figure 2a illustrates the morphology of the pure Al2O3 nanofibers. The diameter of the rather brittle fibers is about 100–200 nm, exhibiting a smooth surface. When 20 mol % SiO2 is incorporated into the Al2O3 matrix, the fibers become ductile with length up to the centimeter scale and a diameter similar to the pure Al2O3 material. Moreover, from the enlarged SEM image shown in the inset of Figure 2b, some black spots were formed on the surface of fibers. This may be due to the precipitation of mullite nanocrystals from the inside to the surface of the Al2O3 during the calcination [18]. When the concentration of SiO2 is further increase to 40 mol % (Figure 2c), the composite fibers show an obvious change, exhibiting a fused, interconnect network with a diameter of ≈500 nm. This may be caused by the formation of mullite components in the samples. The continued increase in the concentration of SiO2 (to 60 and 80 mol %, as shown in Figure 2d and Figure 2e, respectively) results in the coarsening of the surface of the fiber, further implying the precipitation of mullite nanocrystals from the inside to the surface of the fibers during the calcination. Comparably, the pure SiO2 nanofiber has a diameter of ≈100 nm with smooth surface (Figure 2f). Figure 2: SEM images of the obtained composite nanofibers with different Al/(Al–Si) ratios: (a) Al2O3, (b) Al8Si2, (c) Al6Si4, (d) Al4Si6, (e) Al2Si8, and (f) SiO2. The insets are their corresponding enlarged SEM images. Further studies on the microstructure and morphology of the calcined composite nanofibers were conducted by TEM. Figure 3a shows the morphology of the Al4Si6 fibers. It can be seen that the fibers have diameters of about 100–200 nm with a coarse surface, which is consistent with the above SEM results. Additionally, many nanocrystals can be observed in the enlarged TEM image shown in Figure 3b with dimensions from several nm to several tens of nm. The HRTEM image in Figure 3c illustrates that the lattice fringes are well-defined, suggesting that the composite nanowires have a high degree of crystallinity. The interplanar spacing of 0.5495 nm measured from the legible lattice fringes along the axis of the nanowire is quite similar to that of the <110> planes of the mullite crystals [27,28]. In addition, some nanocrystals of cristobalite with dimensions of several tens of nm can also found on the surface of the fibers, as shown in Figure 3d. Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns are collected from the thin edge of one fiber, as shown in the inset of Figure 3c. The patterns not only verify the high degree of crystallinity of the composite nanofibers, but also indicate the disordered stacking of the formed mullite nanocrystals. Figure 3: (a) Low magnification TEM image of Al4Si6 nanofibers; (b) locally enlarged TEM image; (c) HRTEM image of one area shown in (b); and (d) enlarged TEM image of the fiber surface, the inset is the SAED pattern collected from the fiber’s edge. Chemical bonds Previous results indicate the PL from Al2O3–SiO2 composites is mai