Abstract:Background: Adolescent dating violence (ADV) is a serious issue that affects millions of youth worldwide. ADV can be any intentional psychological, emotional, physical, or sexual aggression that occurs in adolescent dating and/or sexual relationships, and can occur both in person and electronically. The mental health consequences of ADV can be significant and far reaching, with studies finding long-term effects of dating violence victimization in adolescence. Preventing ADV so that youth do not experience negative mental health consequences is thus necessary. To be effective, however, prevention efforts must be comprehensive and address more than one domain of the social-ecological model, incorporating risk and protective factors across the individual level; relationship level; community level; and societal level. To support researchers and practitioners in designing such prevention programs, an understanding of what risk and protective factors have been identified over the past several decades of ADV research, and how these factors are distributed across levels of the social-ecological model, is needed. Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We included peer-reviewed articles published in English between January 2000 and September 2020. The search strategy was developed in collaboration with a research librarian. Covidence was used for title and abstract screening and full text review. Data were extracted from included articles using a standardized charting template, and then synthesized into tables by type of factor (risk or protective), role in ADV (victimization or perpetration), and level(s) of the social-ecological model (individual, relationship, community, societal). Results: Our initial search across six databases identified 4,798 potentially relevant articles for title and abstract review. Following title and abstract screening and full text review, we found 20 articles that were relevant to our study objective and that met inclusion criteria. Across these 20 articles, there was a disproportionate focus on risk factors at the individual and relationship levels of the social-ecological model, particularly for ADV perpetration. Very little was found about risk factors at the community or societal levels for ADV victimization or perpetration. Furthermore, a very small proportion of articles identified any protective factors, regardless of level of the social-ecological model. Conclusion: Despite best practice suggesting that ADV prevention strategies should be comprehensive and directed at multiple levels of an individual's social ecology, this systematic scoping review of reviews revealed that very little is known about risk factors beyond the individual and relationship level of the social-ecological model. Further, past research appears steeped in a risk-focused paradigm, given the limited focus on protective factors. Research is needed that identifies risk factors beyond the individual and relationship levels, and a strengths-based focus should be used to identify novel protective factors. In addition, a more critical approach to ADV research – to identify structural and not just individual risk and protective factors – is needed.

Toward a Comprehensive Model of Physical Dating Violence Perpetration and Victimization

Poor Parenting, Attachment Style, and Dating Violence Perpetration Among College Students

Predictors of Physical and Dating Violence in Middle and High School Students in the United States

Understanding Pathways to Physical Teen Dating Violence: Social Learning Theory vs. Birds of a Feather Hypothesis

Individual, Familial, and School Risk Factors Affecting Teen Dating Violence in Early Adolescents: A Longitudinal Path Analysis Model

Attachment styles, alcohol, and childhood experiences of abuse: an analysis of physical violence in dating couples

Longitudinal Trajectories of Physical Teen Dating Perpetration and Trait Anger Expression: A Group-Based Trajectory Approach

Correlates of Relational and Physical Aggression among Peers and Dating Partners in a College Sample

Intimate Partner Violence In College Students: Psychological Perspective

Using Structural Equations to Model Akers’ Social Learning Theory With Data on Intimate Partner Violence

Integrating Dehumanization and Attachment in the Prediction of Teen Dating Violence Perpetration

In-Person and Cyber Dating Abuse: A Longitudinal Investigation

A model of personal relationships and cyberbullying perpetration among adolescents: A person*environment model

Considering context: Current relationship satisfaction in a second‐generation model of men's physical intimate partner violence

Longitudinal Prediction and Concurrent Functioning of Adolescent Girls Demonstrating Various Profiles of Dating Violence and Victimization

Attachment Style and Emotional Regulation as Protective and Risk Factors in Mutual Dating Violence among Youngsters: A Moderated Mediation Model

He Said, She Said: a Dyadic Perspective on Adolescent Conflict Management and Dating Violence

What Helps and Hinders Students’ Intervening in Incidents of Dating Violence On Campus? an Exploratory Study Using Focus Groups

Exploring risk and protective factors for adolescent dating violence across the social-ecological model: A systematic scoping review of reviews

The Impact of Parent-Child Closeness and Romantic Attachment on Dating Violence Perpetration in Adolescence

Violence Exposure and Psychopathology as Potential Correlates and Risk Factors of Relational Aggression among Diverse College Students