Abstract:Can egalitarian norms or conventions survive the presence of dominant individuals who are ensured of victory in conflicts? We investigate the interaction of power asymmetry and partner choice in games of conflict over a contested resource. We introduce three models to study the emergence and resilience of cooperation among unequals when interaction is random, when individuals can choose their partners, and where power asymmetries dynamically depend on accumulated payoffs. We find that the ability to avoid bullies with higher competitive ability afforded by partner choice mostly restores cooperative conventions and that the competitive hierarchy never forms. Partner choice counteracts the hyper dominance of bullies who are isolated in the network and eliminates the need for others to coordinate in a coalition. When competitive ability dynamically depends on cumulative payoffs, complex cycles of coupled network-strategy-rank changes emerge. Effective collaborators gain popularity (and thus power), adopt aggressive behavior, get isolated, and ultimately lose power. Neither the network nor behavior converge to a stable equilibrium. Despite the instability of power dynamics, the cooperative convention in the population remains stable overall and long-term inequality is completely eliminated. The interaction between partner choice and dynamic power asymmetry is crucial for these results: without partner choice, bullies cannot be isolated, and without dynamic power asymmetry, bullies do not lose their power even when isolated. We analytically identify a single critical point that marks a phase transition in all three iterations of our models. This critical point is where the first individual breaks from the convention and cycles start to emerge.

Attack versus defense: A strategic rationale for role differentiation in conflict

Ancillary Mechanism for Autonomous Decision-Making Process in Asymmetric Confrontation: a View from Gomoku

Evolutionary Dynamics Drives Role Specialization in a Community of Players

Heterogeneous Roles against Assignment Based Policies in Two vs Two Target Defense Game

On being unpredictable and winning.

Optimal defense-attack strategies between M defenders and N attackers: A method based on cumulative prospect theory

Optimal Defense with Variable Number of Overarching and Individual Protections

Learning to Defend by Attacking (and Vice-Versa): Transfer of Learning in Cybersecurity Games

The Evolutionary Psychology of War: Offense and Defense in the Adapted Mind

Defending a series system with individual protection, overarching protection, and disinformation

Adversaries With Incentives: A Strategic Alternative to Adversarial Robustness

Strong Stackelberg reasoning in symmetric games: An experimental replication and extension

The impacts of adaptive attacking and defending strategies on mitigation of intentional threats

Avoiding the bullies: The resilience of cooperation among unequals

Adaptive Attacker Strategy Development Against Moving Target Cyber Defenses

Quantifying Adversary Capabilities to Inform Defensive Resource Allocation

Reentrant phase transitions and defensive alliances in social dilemmas with informed strategies

A normative theory of social conflict

The Evolution of Social Dominance II: Multi-Player Models

An Attacker–Defender Game Model with Constrained Strategies

Individual vs. overarching protection for minimizing the expected damage caused by an attack