Number of Removed Pelvic Lymph Nodes as a Prognostic Marker in FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer with Negative Lymph Nodes

Rongmin Wang,Xiang Tao,Xiaoyi Wu,Hongyuan Jiang,Hexia Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.002
Abstract:Study objective: To investigate whether the number of removed lymph nodes (RLNs) influences the clinical outcome of stage IB1 cervical cancer on the premise of uniform pelvic lymphadenectomy. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. Patients: Women (n = 782) with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Interventions: Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and uniform pelvic lymphadenectomy (common iliac, external iliac, internal iliac, obturator) for stage IB1 cervical cancer. The median time of follow-up was 64.7 months (range, 4.3-102.8). Measurements and main results: Of 782 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer, the median number of pelvic RLNs was 19 (range, 7-49). Twenty-one patients (2.7%) had RLNs ≤ 10, 461 (59.0%) had 11 to 20, 263 (33.6%) had 21 to 30, and 37 (4.7%) had RLNs ≥ 31. The differences were not statistically significant in the clinicopathologic characteristics between the 4 groups (p >.05). In the multivariate analysis, pelvic RLN number became an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in stage IB1 cervical cancer (p = .029; .015 for CSS and PFS). After the stratified analysis by lymph node metastasis, RLN number remained an independent predictive value (p = .026 for CSS, p = .012 for PFS) in patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes. Moreover, patients with RLN number ≤ 10 carried a 5.550-fold higher risk for progression (p <.001) and 5.596-fold greater likelihood of death (p = .001) than those with RLN number > 10 in case of no lymph node metastasis. Conclusion: With uniform pelvic lymphadenectomy, the total pelvic RLN number could be a valuable predictor of outcome in stage IB1 cervical cancer without lymph node metastasis during a follow-up of at least 5 years.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?