Specific sonographic features of placenta accreta: tissue interface disruption on gray‐scale imaging and evidence of vessels crossing interface‐ disruption sites on Doppler imaging

H. Wong,Y. Cheung,L. Strand,P. Carryer,S. Parker,J. Tait,K. Pringle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.3915
2007-02-01
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract:The antenatal detection rate of placenta accreta (a collective term for accreta, increta and percreta) on ultrasound varies in the literature, ranging from 33% (4/12)1 to 100% (5/5)2. Similarly, the gray-scale sonographic diagnostic criteria are diverse (placental lacunae, absence of the retroplacental clear zone and interruption of posterior bladder wall–uterine interface), with the sensitivity of individual criteria ranging from 7% to 93%3. With the use of color and/or power Doppler, the reported sensitivity and specificity of antenatal diagnosis increase to 82.4–100% and 92–96.8%, respectively2,4,5. We have reported the sonographic signs of tissue interface disruption on gray-scale imaging and those of vessels crossing interface-disruption sites on Doppler imaging6 (Figure 1). These signs correspond with the histological findings of placenta accreta. In this retrospective analysis, we examined the performance of these signs in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. From our departmental ultrasound database, 41 patients were identified who had been referred for the exclusion of placenta accreta in 2004–2005. Five patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the analysis. Gray-scale imaging was performed in all of the remaining 36 patients and Doppler (color and/or power) was perfomed in 30, using ATL HDI 5000 or iU22 ultrasound machines (Philips, Bothell, WA, USA). Doppler was not performed if on gray-scale imaging there was clear
What problem does this paper attempt to address?