Abstract:Abstract Objective Predicting the risk of anastomotic leak (AL) is of importance when defining the optimal surgical strategy in colorectal surgery. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of existing scores in the field. Methods We followed the PRISMA checklist (S1 Checklist). Medline, Cochrane Central and Embase were searched for observational studies reporting on scores predicting AL after the creation of a colorectal anastomosis. Studies reporting only validation of existing scores and/or scores based on post-operative variables were excluded. PRISMA 2020 recommendations were followed. Qualitative analysis was performed. Results Eight hundred articles were identified. Seven hundred and ninety-one articles were excluded after title/abstract and full-text screening, leaving nine studies for analysis. Scores notably included the Colon Leakage Score, the modified Colon Leakage Score, the REAL score, www.anastomoticleak.com and the PROCOLE score. Four studies (44.4%) included more than 1.000 patients and one extracted data from existing studies (meta-analysis of risk factors). Scores included the following pre-operative variables: age (44.4%), sex (77.8%), ASA score (66.6%), BMI (33.3%), diabetes (22.2%), respiratory comorbidity (22.2%), cardiovascular comorbidity (11.1%), liver comorbidity (11.1%), weight loss (11.1%), smoking (33.3%), alcohol consumption (33.3%), steroid consumption (33.3%), neo-adjuvant treatment (44.9%), anticoagulation (11.1%), hematocrit concentration (22.2%), total proteins concentration (11.1%), white blood cell count (11.1%), albumin concentration (11.1%), distance from the anal verge (77.8%), number of hospital beds (11.1%), pre-operative bowel preparation (11.1%) and indication for surgery (11.1%). Scores included the following peri-operative variables: emergency surgery (22.2%), surgical approach (22.2%), duration of surgery (66.6%), blood loss/transfusion (55.6%), additional procedure (33.3%), operative complication (22.2%), wound contamination class (1.11%), mechanical anastomosis (1.11%) and experience of the surgeon (11.1%). Five studies (55.6%) reported the area under the curve (AUC) of the scores, and four (44.4%) included a validation set. Conclusion Existing scores are heterogeneous in the identification of pre-operative variables allowing predicting AL. A majority of scores was established from small cohorts of patients which, considering the low incidence of AL, might lead to miss potential predictors of AL. AUC is seldom reported. We recommend that new scores to predict the risk of AL in colorectal surgery to be based on large cohorts of patients, to include a validation set and to report the AUC.

Detection of early anastomotic leakage by intraperitoneal microdialysis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study

Relative decline in serum albumin help to predict anastomotic leakage for female patients following sphincter-preserving rectal surgery

Early Prediction of Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery Using Creactive Protein

Serum and peritoneal biomarkers for the early prediction of symptomatic anastomotic leakage in patients following laparoscopic low anterior resection: A single-center prospective cohort study

Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery using an inflammatory factors-based score system

Early Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leakage After Gastric Cancer Surgery Via Analysis of Inflammatory Factors in Abdominal Drainage

MRI diagnose post-operative anastomotic leak in patients with rectal cancer: preliminary experience

Laparoscopic colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: can we reliably predict anastomotic leakage and major postoperative complications in the early postoperative period?

Risk and early predictive factors of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer

LABORATORY PREDICTORS FOR DIAGNOSING COLORECTAL ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE

Outcomes based on risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

Early warning model to detect anastomotic leakage following colon surgery: a clinical observational study

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer (RALAR study): A nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group

Score prediction of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a systematic review

A 10-year experience with anastomotic leaks in upper gastrointestinal surgery–Retrospective cohort study

Early detection of anastomotic leakage in upper gastrointestinal surgery

[Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer].

Very Early Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage Within 5 Post-operative Days: a More Severe Subtype Needs Relaparatomy

Symptomatic anastomotic leakage diagnosed after hospital discharge following low anterior resection for rectal cancer

Value of Intra-Operative Doppler Sonographic Measurements in Predicting Post-Operative Anastomotic Leakage in Rectal Cancer: a Prospective Pilot Study.

Blood perfusion assessment by near-infrared fluorescence angiography of epiploic appendages in prevention of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a case-matched study