P–600 Ovarian function following intraovarian injection of autologous platelet rich plasma (APRP) in women with low functional ovarian reserve
D Barad,S K Darmon,A Benor,N Gleicher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab130.599
IF: 6.1
2021-07-01
Human Reproduction
Abstract:Abstract Study question Does exposure of ovaries to autologous growth factors in platelet rich plasma (APRP) affect the pituitary ovarian axis? Summary answer Within 60 days after injection, growing follicle numbers and estrogen levels increased, though FSH did not change, with effects most pronounced in still menstruating women. What is known already APRP is extracted from a patient’s autologous blood and delivers growth factors. It is widely used in several medical specialties and has in infertility practice been reported to increase folicle/egg numbers if injected into ovaries and improve endometrial thickness/implantation if used for perfusion of the endometrium. Study design, size, duration Prospective observational cohort study of women with low functional ovarian reserve, followed for 60 days after subcortical injection of ovaries. Participants/materials, setting, methods 44 women with prior poor response to ovulation induction, FSH > 12 mIU/mL and AMH < 1.0 ng/mL. APRP was prepared using Regen Lab PRP Kit which is approved by the US-FDA. 1.0–1.5 ml of PRP was injected into the cortex of each ovary divided among 7 to 10 injection sites. Participants were followed every three days with monitoring for estradiol, FSH and follicle growth for the first two weeks after PRP and then weekly. Main results and the role of chance 21/43 patients still regularly menstruated (subgroup A, age 43.9 ± 5.1 years); 23/43 (subgroup B, age 42.6 ± 6.2 years) were amenorrheic for a median of 6 months. In A, AMH, FSH and estradiol were 0.18 ± 0.20 ng/mL, 37.5 ± 47.6 mIU/mL, and 100.2 ± 73.4 pg/mL, while in B they were 0.06 ± 0.11 ng/mL, 73.0 ± 44.8 mIU/mL and 66.7 ± 57.6 pg/mL. Following APRP, A-patients demonstrated increased estradiol to 211 ± 193.7 pg/mL (P = 0.029) while B-patients only demonstrated a trend to 98.1 ± 86.5 (P = 0.09). Among A patients, 14/21 (66.7%) entered IVF cycles and 5/21 (23.8%) reached retrieval. So-far 1 patients established an ongoing clinical pregnancy. Among B patients 8/23 (34.8%) entered IVF cycles and only 2/23 (8.7%) reached retrieval and none achieved pregnancy. Limitations, reasons for caution This observational study was only carried out to estimate possible effects of APRP treatments. Based on these observations, we are now conducting a randomized controlled trial, limited to cycling women under age 45 years [registration # NCT04278313]. Wider implications of the findings: PRP appears to have limited ability to affect ovarian reserve of older, and especially amenorrheic women. It may, however, exert more favorable effects on still menstruating women. Promotion of APRP treatment as “ovarian rejuvenation,” however, appears to be an inappropriate choice of words. Trial registration number N/A
obstetrics & gynecology,reproductive biology