Abstract:Abstract Background Balance and trunk control are often impaired in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). Interventions addressing these issues are needed. Objective The objective of this study was to compare the immediate and long-term effects of a 6-week individualized, group-based, comprehensive core stability intervention (GroupCoreDIST) with standard care on balance and trunk control in individuals with MS. Design This study was a prospective, assessor-masked, randomized controlled trial. Setting The GroupCoreDIST intervention was conducted by 6 physical therapists in 6 municipalities in Norway. Standard care included the usual care for individuals with MS in the same municipalities. Assessments at all time points took place at a Norwegian hospital. Participants Eighty people with Expanded Disability Status scores of 1 to 6.5 participated in this trial. Intervention Randomized, concealed allocation was used to assign the participants to the GroupCoreDIST intervention (n = 40) or to standard care (n = 40). The GroupCoreDIST intervention was conducted with groups of 3 participants (1 group had 4 participants), for 60 minutes 3 times per week. Measurements Assessments were undertaken at baseline and at weeks 7, 18, and 30. Outcomes were measured with the Trunk Impairment Scale–Norwegian Version, Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and Patient Global Impression of Change–Balance. Repeated-measures mixed models were used for statistical analysis. Results One individual missed all postintervention tests, leaving 79 participants in the intention-to-treat analysis. GroupCoreDIST produced significant between-group effects on the mean difference in the following scores at 7, 18, and 30 weeks: for Trunk Impairment Scale–Norwegian Version, 2.63 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.89–3.38), 1.57 points (95% CI = 0.81–2.33), and 0.95 point (95% CI = 0.19–1.71), respectively; for Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test, 1.91 points (95% CI = 1.07–2.76), 1.28 points (95% CI = 0.42–2.15), and 0.91 points (95% CI = 0.04–1.77), respectively; and for Patient Global Impression of Change–Balance, 1.21 points (95% CI = 1.66–0.77), 1.02 points (95% CI = 1.48–0.57), and 0.91 points (95% CI = 1.36–0.46), respectively. Limitations Groups were not matched for volume of physical therapy. Conclusions Six weeks of GroupCoreDIST improved balance and trunk control in the short and long terms compared with standard care in individuals who were ambulant and had MS. The intervention is an effective contribution to physical therapy for this population.

Group-based, individualized, comprehensive core stability and balance intervention provides immediate and long-term improvements in walking in individuals with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial

Group-Based Individualized Comprehensive Core Stability Intervention Improves Balance in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Investigating the effects of core stability training on balance and gait in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial on additional core stability exercises training for improving dynamic sitting balance and trunk control in stroke patients

Effects of a core stabilization training program on balance ability in persons with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled trial

Effect of core stability training on postural control, risk of falling, and function of the blind: A randomized controlled trial

Overground walking improvements in a person with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis after Alter-G antigravity treadmill training

Effects of balance-specific exercises on balance, physical activity and quality of life in adults with multiple sclerosis: a pilot investigation

Characterizing the Longitudinal Impact of Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training on Walking and Balance Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Single Center Clinical Trial

Cognitive-motor dual-task training improves dynamic stability during straight and curved gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial

Balance and walking after three different models of stroke rehabilitation: early supported discharge in a day unit or at home, and traditional treatment (control)

Comparative Effect of a Balance Training Program and Core Stabilization Program on Factors Related to the Prevention of Falling in Healthy Middle-Aged Individuals: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing backward walking to forward walking training on balance in multiple sclerosis: The TRAIN-MS trial

A four-week minimalist shoe walking intervention influences foot posture and balance in young adults–a randomized controlled trial

Effects of Balance Exercise Interventions on Balance-Related Performance in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Effectiveness of Balance Exercise and Brisk Walking on Alleviating Nonmotor and Motor Symptoms in People With Mild-to-Moderate Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial With 6-Month Follow-up

The Effects of Core Stabilization Exercise on Dynamic Balance and Gait Function in Stroke Patients

Influence of core stabilization exercise on physical function and muscle thickness in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled clinical trial

The effects of a task-oriented walking intervention on improving balance self-efficacy in post-stroke patients

Effects of an individual 12-week community-located “start-to-run” program on physical capacity, walking, fatigue, cognitive function, brain volumes, and structures in persons with multiple sclerosis

Rehabilitation with accurate adaptability walking tasks or steady state walking: A randomized clinical trial in adults post-stroke