Abstract:Background Despite several treatments that have been used for women reporting vaginal laxity (VL), to our knowledge no systematic review is available on the topic so far. Aim In this study, we sought to summarize the best available evidence about the efficacy and safety of interventions for treating VL, whether conservative or surgical. Methods A comprehensive search strategy was performed in Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for reports of clinical trials published from database inception to September 2022. Studies selected for inclusion were in the English language and were performed to investigate any type of treatment for VL, with or without a comparator, whether nonrandomized studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Case reports and studies without a clear definition of VL were excluded. Outcomes The outcomes were interventions (laser, radiofrequency, surgery, and topical treatment), adverse effects, sexual function, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength, and improvement of VL by the VL questionnaire (VLQ). Results From 816 records, 38 studies remained in the final analysis. Laser and radiofrequency (RF) were the energy-based treatment devices most frequently studied. Pooled data from eight observational studies have shown improved sexual function assessed by a Female Sexual Function Index score mean difference (MD) of 6.51 (95% CI, 5.61-7.42; i 2 = 85%, P < .01) before and after intervention, whether by RF (MD, 6.00; 95% CI, 4.26-7.73; i 2 = 80%; P < .001) or laser (MD, 6.83; 95% CI, 5.01-8.65; i 2 = 92%; P < .01). However, this finding was not shown when only 3 RCTs were included, even when separated by type of intervention (RF or laser). When RF treatment was compared to sham controls, VLQ scores did not improve (MD, 1.01; 95% CI, −0.38 to 2.40; i 2 = 94%; P < .001). Patient PFM strength improved after interventions were performed (MD, 4.22; 95% CI, 1.02-7.42; i 2 = 77%; P < .001). The ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions) tool classified all non-RCTs at serious risk of bias, except for 1 study, and the risk of bias—1 analysis found a low and unclear risk of bias for all RCTs. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) certainty of the evidence was moderate for sexual function and the VLQ questionnaire and low for PFM strength. Clinical Implications Sexual function in women with VL who underwent RF and laser treatment improved in observational studies but not in RCTs. Improvement in PFM strength was observed in women with VL after the intervention. Strengths and Limitations Crucial issues were raised for the understanding of VL, such as lack of standardization of the definition and for the development of future prospective studies. A limitation of the study was that the heterogeneity of the interventions and different follow-up periods did not make it possible to pool all available data. Conclusions Vaginal tightening did not improve sensation in women with VL after intervention, whereas RF and laser improved sexual function in women with VL according to data from observational studies, but not from RCTs. PFM strength was improved after intervention in women with VL.

Ultrasound imaging of core muscles activity in multiparous women with vaginal laxity: a cross-sectional study

Measurement of the vaginal wall thickness by transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound of women with vaginal laxity: a cross-sectional study

Dynamic Evaluation of the Rectus Abdominis Muscle Before and after Delivery by Ultrasonography

Functional and sexual outcomes following surgical vaginal introital reduction

Pelvic floor muscle training vs radiofrequency for women with vaginal laxity: randomized clinical trial

Influence of vaginal birth on lumbopelvic muscle mechanical properties on urinary incontinence

Analysis of multisite surface electromyography characteristics of pelvic floor muscles in postpartum patients with diastasis recti abdominis

The Correlation between Transperineal Shear-Wave Elastography and Transabdominal Ultrasound When Assessing Pelvic Floor Function in Nulliparous Women

Micro-Focused Ultrasound Therapy in Patients with Urogenital Atrophy and Vaginal Laxity

Altered Abdominal Muscle Recruitment and Declined Physical Function in Postpartum Individuals With Pregnancy‐Related Pelvic Girdle Pain: A Matched Case‐Control Study

Treatment of women with vaginal laxity: systematic review with meta-analysis

Lateral abdominal muscle thickness and contractile function in women with and without stress urinary incontinence

Nonablative, Noncoagulative Multipolar Radiofrequency and Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Treatment Improves Vaginal Laxity and Sexual Function

Postpartum Changes in Levator Plate Shape and Genital Hiatus Size After Vaginal Delivery

Experiences of women with symptoms of vaginal laxity – a qualitative study

Differences in Abdominal and Lumbar Muscle Thickness and Contractile Function Between Nulliparous, Primiparous, and Multiparous Women 6 Months Postpartum

The impact of acute and chronic strenuous exercise on pelvic floor muscle strength and support in nulliparous healthy women

Pelvic floor muscle strength and influencing factors based on vaginal manometry among healthy women at different life stages: A multicentre cross‐sectional study

Quantitative Evaluation Of Female Pelvic Floor Muscle Biomechanics Using Ultrasound Elastography

Current Perspectives in Vaginal Laxity Measurement: A Scoping Review

Correlation between self-reported low back pain and morphological changes in abdominal wall muscles