Contact reaction to flame retardant

D. Nicholls,I. White
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1988.tb05524.x
1988-08-01
Contact Dermatitis
Abstract:A 71-year-old woman, who was treated with calcmm heparm 5000 units given subcutaneously twice daily, developed complamts of redness and itchmg at the sites of the Injections after I week. Later, large erythematous plaques with central bullae appeared at these sites, followed by a generalized Itchy erythematopapular eruption with fever up to 39°C. The medicament was stopped and the patient was g:tven an antih1stamme. After that, the skm eruption gradually disappeared m about a week. Inqmry revealed that the patient had had a Similar reaction to hepann 5 years earlier, but at that time, the symptoms had not started until after I month of treatment. Skm tests with hepann were performed 3 months later. The results of a patch test with the undiluted preparation were negative, but an mtradermal test with 0.05 ml of vanous dilutiOns (up to 25 U /ml) of a calcmm hepann solution gave an Immediate-type positive reaction, charactenzed by erythema and edema, after 20 mm. Moreover, a delayed reaction to the same dilution, consisting of erythema arid papules, became manifest after 48 h. 10 controls showed negative reactions to the same test.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?