Abstract:Importance: Fruit drinks are widely consumed by young children, and many parents mistakenly believe that these drinks are healthy, potentially due to front-of-package claims and imagery. Research is needed on the influence of this marketing and how labeling regulations could change behavior. Objective: To assess the effects of a front-of-package 100% vitamin C claim, fruit imagery, percentage juice and teaspoons of added sugar disclosures, and high-added sugar warnings on parents' choices, knowledge, and perceptions of beverages. Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted May to July 2021 as a single-exposure (no follow-up) online survey of primary caregivers of children ages 0 to 5 years throughout the US. Interventions: Participants were shown no-, low-, and high-added sugar beverages and asked to choose 1 for their child. Participants were randomized to see high-added sugar beverages with 1 of 7 front-of-package conditions: (1) claim and imagery (control); (2) no claim; (3) no imagery; (4) no claim or imagery; (5) claim, imagery, and percentage juice disclosure; (6) claim, imagery, and warning; or (7) claim, imagery, warning, and teaspoons of added sugar disclosure. Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were type of beverage chosen (eg, high-added sugar beverage) and resulting calories and added sugar (in grams). Secondary outcomes were fruit drink knowledge (added sugar and percent juice) and perceptions. Results: There were 5005 participants included in the final analysis (mean [SD] age, 31.5 [8.3] years; 3587 female participants [71.7%]), including 714 participants in group 1, 717 participants in group 2, 710 participants in group 3, 717 participants in group 4, 708 participants in group 5, 729 participants in group 6, and 710 participants in group 7. Compared with participants in the control group, who had a mean (standard error [SE]) of 9.4 (0.5) g of added sugar and 81.9 (1.6) kcal in chosen beverages, only participants who saw warnings with teaspoons of added sugar disclosures had significantly reduced added sugar (-1.3 g; 95% CI, -2.6 to -0.1 g [-14.2%; 95% CI, -26.7% to -1.8%]; P = .04) and calories (-5.3 kcal; 95% CI, -9.8 to -0.9 kcal [-6.5%; 95% CI, -11.8% to -1.3%]; P = .02) in selected beverages. In warning conditions (ie, 6 and 7) compared with the control group (mean [SE] 41.0% [1.8%]), the proportion of participants choosing high-added sugar beverages was significantly reduced, by 5.5 percentage points (95% CI, 0.5 to 10.5 percentage points [13.4%; 95% CI, 1.2% to 25.6%]; P = .03) and 6.4 percentage points (95% CI, 1.4 to 11.4 percentage points [15.6%; 95% CI, 3.3% to 27.8%]; P = .01), respectively. The no claim or imagery condition (4) significantly reduced the proportion of parents choosing high-added sugar beverages (-7.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -12.6 to -2.6 percentage points [-18.4%; 95% CI, -30.6% to -6.3%]; P = .003). Percentage juice disclosures did not affect beverage choice. Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that added sugar warnings and prohibitions of front-of-package claims and imagery may reduce parents' purchases of high-added sugar beverages for their young children but that percentage juice disclosures may not change behavior. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04811690.

Attention to food health warnings in children's advertising: a French perspective

Youth behavioural responses to regulated alcohol advertising content: Results from a mixed-methods study in France

Internet marketing directed at children on food and restaurant websites in two policy environments

Differences in child and adolescent exposure to unhealthy food and beverage advertising on television in a self-regulatory environment

Nutritional Quality and Degree of Processing of Children's Foods Assessment on the French Market

Effect of Front-of-Package Information, Fruit Imagery, and High-Added Sugar Warning Labels on Parent Beverage Choices for Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Monitoring Food Marketing Directed to Portuguese Children Broadcasted on Television

Children's measured exposure to food and beverage advertising on television in Toronto (Canada), May 2011-May 2019

Trends in Children's Exposure to Food and Beverage Advertising on Television

[Consumption of fruit juices and fruit drinks: impact on the health of children and teenagers, the dentist's point of view]

Food and Beverage Advertising to Children and Adolescents on Television: A Baseline Study

Exposure of Children to Unhealthy Food and Beverage Advertisements in South Africa

Adolescents' media usage and self-reported exposure to advertising across six countries: implications for less healthy food and beverage marketing

Children's self-regulation of eating provides no defense against television and online food marketing

Advertising Unhealthy Food to Children: on the Importance of Regulations, Parenting Styles, and Media Literacy

Children's perception of food marketing across digital media platforms.

Analysis of food advertising to children on Spanish television: probing exposure to television marketing

'Even if you don't pay attention to it, you know it's there': A qualitative exploration of adolescents' experiences with digital food marketing

The impact of pictorial health warnings on purchases of sugary drinks for children: A randomized controlled trial

Creating good feelings about unhealthy food: children’s televised ‘advertised diet’ on the island of Ireland, in a climate of regulation

Children's everyday exposure to food marketing: an objective analysis using wearable cameras