Percutaneous fragmentation and extraction of a large renal calculus.

R. Lieberman,D. Uehling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.138.2.363

1982-02-01

Abstract:A 6i -year-old man had already undergone right nephrectomy and two left pyelotomies for renal calculi when he developed a left uretenal calculus and a renal calculus trapped in an upper pole calix. Because renal function was already compromised, the urologist performed a nephrostomy without removing the stones. Nephrostomy drainage through a 24 French catheter was continued until the time of our procedure, 9 years later. We discussed the possibility of percutaneous stone extraction and admitted the patient for this procedure. A preliminary nephrostogram showed both calculi, the lower one completely obstructing the ureter. We decided to extract only the ureteral calculus to minimize risk to the kidney. The nephrostomy was straight and well formed, and it easily admitted our catheters. A J-tipped guide wire was advanced down the ureter below the stone, followed by a 5 French catheter, and exchanged for a Medi-Tech stone basket (fig. 1 A). The basket engaged the stone and pulled it up to the renal pelvis (fig. 1 B), but the stone was too large to extract. Continuous firm traction on the basket did not fragment the stone. A Lowsley grasping forceps was passed through the tract and opened in the renal pelvis under fluoroscopic control, engaging the stone (fig. i C) and crushing it. Most fragments were removed by a Randall stone-grasping forceps (fig. i D) and a stone basket. Othenfragments passed spontaneously through the nephrostomy tube. Two weeks after crushing the stone, a single fragment remained in an inaccessible lower pole calix. The upper pole calculus was unchanged. Urine flowed freely into the bladder. We decided to retain and clamp the nephrostomy tube.