Rasmussen's encephalitis: an autoimmune disorder?

Andrews Pi,James O McNamara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(96)80102-4

IF: 7.07

1996-04-01

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials

Pramit Khetrapal,Joanna Kae Ling Wong,Wei Phin Tan,Thiara Rupasinghe,Wei Shen Tan,Carl Wijburg,Peter Wiklund,Nikhil Vasdev,Muhammad Shamim Khan,Stephen B. Williams,Stephen A. Boorjian,Dipen J. Parekh,Khurshid A. Guru,James W.F. Catto,John D. Kelly

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.004

IF: 24.267

2023-05-01

European Urology

Abstract:CONTEXT: Differences in recovery, oncological, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes between open radical cystectomy (ORC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for patients with bladder cancer are unclear.OBJECTIVE: This review aims to compare these outcomes within randomized trials of ORC and RARC in this context. The primary outcome was the rate of 90-d perioperative events. The secondary outcomes included operative, pathological, survival, and health-related QoL (HRQoL) measures.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Systematic literature searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov were performed up to May 31, 2022.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eight trials, reporting 1024 participants, were included. RARC was associated with a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS; mean difference [MD] 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.39, p = 0.02) than and similar complication rates to ORC. ORC was associated with higher thromboembolic events (odds ratio [OR] 1.84, 95% CI 1.02-3.31, p = 0.04). ORC was associated with more blood loss (MD 322 ml, 95% CI 193-450, p < 0.001) and transfusions (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.65-3.36, p < 0.001), but shorter operative time (MD 76 min, 95% CI 39-112, p < 0.001) than RARC. No differences in lymph node yield (MD 1.07, 95% CI -1.73 to 3.86, p = 0.5) or positive surgical margin rates (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.54-1.67, p = 0.9) were present. RARC was associated with better physical functioning or well-being (standardized MD 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.65, p < 0.001) and role functioning (MD 8.8, 95% CI 2.4-15.1, p = 0.007), but no improvement in overall HRQoL. No differences in progression-free survival or overall survival were seen. Limitations may include a lack of generalization given trial patients.CONCLUSIONS: RARC offers various perioperative benefits over ORC. It may be more suitable in patients wishing to avoid blood transfusion, those wanting a shorter LOS, or those at a high risk of thromboembolic events.PATIENT SUMMARY: This study compares robot-assisted keyhole surgery with open surgery for bladder cancer. The robot-assisted approach offered less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer blood clots. No other differences were seen.

urology & nephrology
Comparison Of Perioperative Outcomes In Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy And Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

Shiwei Zhang,Tingsheng Lin,Qing Zhang,Shengjie Zhang,Guangxiang Liu,Changwei Ji,Hongqian Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2074

2020-01-01

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Abstract:Objective To report perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and laparoscopic radical cystectomy.Patients and Methods Between January 2010 and July 2019, 298 patients with bladder cancer underwent robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) (n = 172) and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) (n = 126) at our institution were enrolled in the retrospective study. The demographic, perioperative, and complication data were collected and analyzed.Results The RARC group had less operative duration (P < .001), less blood loss (P < .001), lower transfusion rate (P < .05), and shorter hospital stay (P < .001) than the LRC group. The 90-day readmission rate between the RARC and LRC group had no significant differences (P = .401). The 90-day overall complication rates in the RARC group was much lower than the LRC group (P = .009). The 90-day minor complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade <= IIA) between the RARC and LRC groups were similar (P = .274). The 90-day major complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade >= IIIA) in the LRC group was higher than the RARC group (P = .022).Conclusions The RARC approach appears to offer some operative and perioperative benefits compared with the LRC approach. Larger, randomized studies are required to confirm these findings.
[Cloning of group A streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin-B gene and its recombinant protein expression in culture supernatant].

Y. Watanabe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1272/JNMS.68.222

2001-06-01

Abstract:Streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin B, a conserved cysteine protease (SPE B/SCP) released by group A Streptococcus (GAS) strains, is considered to be an important virulence factor of this bacterium. This paper reports the cloning of gene encoding SPE B/SCP. For production of recombinant SPE B/SCP (rSPE B/SCP), the primers specific for the SPE B/SCP gene (spe b) were designed based on its nucleotide sequence. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed with the genomic DNA of GAS strain NZ131 as a template. The amplified PCR products were purified and cloned into the pBluescript II SK(+) plasmid vector. The vector was transformed into Escherichia coli (E. coli) JM109. The rSPE B/SCP and its recombinant proenzyme (rzym) were secreted in the culture supernate of the transformant. The rSPE B/SCP was purified from the supernatant by sequential chromatography on DEAE-Sepharose, matrix gel Red A and Sephadex G-50 columns. The purified rzym and rSPE B/SCP, respectively, gave a single band with a molecular weight approximately 40 kDa and 27 kDa on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and reacted with anti-SPE B/SCP antibodies in Western Blot analysis. This is the first report in which rSPE B/SCP was obtained from the culture supernate of the transformant.
Robot-assisted vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults

Bhavan Prasad Rai,Jasper Bondad,Nikhil Vasdev,Jim Adshead,Tim Lane,Kamran Ahmed,Mohammed S Khan,Prokar Dasgupta,Khurshid Guru,Piotr L Chlosta,Omar M Aboumarzouk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14870

Abstract:Background: It has been suggested that, in comparison with open radical cystectomy (ORC), robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) results in less blood loss, shorter convalescence and fewer complications, with equivalent short-term oncological and functional outcomes; however, uncertainty remains as to the magnitude of these benefits. Objectives: To assess the effects of RARC vs ORC in adults with bladder cancer. Search methods: We conducted a comprehensive search, with no restrictions on language of publication or publication status, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared RARC with ORC. The date of the last search was 1 July 2018. Databases searched included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (1999 to July 2018), PubMed Embase (1999 to July 2018), Web of Science (1999 to July 2018), Cancer Research UK (www.cancerresearchuk.org/), and the Institute of Cancer Research (www.icr.ac.uk/). We also searched the following trial registers: ClinicalTrials.gov (clinicaltrials.gov/); BioMed Central International Standard Randomized Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) Registry (www.isrctn.com); and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The review was based on a published protocol. Primary outcomes of the review were recurrence-free survival and major postoperative complications (Clavien grade III to V). Secondary outcomes were minor postoperative complications (Clavien grades I and II), transfusion requirement, length of hospital stay (days), quality of life, and positive surgical margins (%). Three review authors independently assessed relevant titles and abstracts of records identified by the literature search to determine which studies should be assessed further. Two review authors assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and rated the quality of evidence according to GRADE. We used Review Manager 5 to analyse the data. Results: We included in the review five RCTs comprising a total of 541 participants. Total numbers of participants included in the ORC and RARC cohorts were 270 and 271, respectively. We found that RARC and ORC may result in a similar time to recurrence (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 1.43; two trials, low-certainty evidence). In absolute terms at 5 years of follow-up, this corresponds to 16 more recurrences per 1000 participants (95% CI 79 fewer to 123 more) with 431 recurrences per 1000 participants for ORC. We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations and imprecision. RARC and ORC may result in similar rates of major complications (risk ratio [RR] 1.06, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.48; five trials, low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 11 more major complications per 1000 participants (95% CI 44 fewer to 89 more). We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations and imprecision. We were very uncertain whether RARC reduces minor complications (very-low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations and very serious imprecision. RARC probably results in substantially fewer transfusions than ORC (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.80; two trials, moderate-certainty evidence). This corresponds to 193 fewer transfusions per 1000 participants (95% CI 262 fewer to 92 fewer) based on 460 transfusion per 1000 participants for ORC. We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations. RARC may result in a slightly shorter hospital stay than ORC (mean difference -0.67, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.12; five trials, low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations and imprecision. RARC and ORC may result in a similar quality of life (standardized mean difference 0.08, 95% CI 0.32 lower to 0.16 higher; three trials, low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations and imprecision. RARC and ORC may result in similar positive surgical margin rates (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.40; five trials, low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to eight more (95% CI 21 fewer to 67 more) positive surgical margins per 1000 participants, based on 48 positive surgical margins per 1000 participants for ORC. We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations and imprecision. Conclusions: We conclude that RARC and ORC may have similar outcomes with regard to time to recurrence, rates of major complications, quality of life, and positive surgical margin rates (all low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain whether the robotic approach reduces rates of minor complications (very-low-certainty evidence), although it probably reduces the risk of blood transfusions substantially (moderate-certainty evidence) and may reduce hospital stay slightly (low-certainty evidence). We were unable to conduct any of the preplanned subgroup analyses to assess the impact of patient age, pathological stage, body habitus, or surgeon expertise on outcomes. This review did not address issues of cost-effectiveness.
Modeling and Transformation of 3D Human Motion

S. A. Etemad,A. Arya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0002755003070315

2010-09-10

Abstract:Applying different styles of motion such as those related to gender, age and energy of the performer, are important themes in creating realistic animation. While typically different sets of motion sequences must be created for different styles, in this paper we present a technique for transferring motion styles across different sequences. This allows transforming the style of a motion while preserving the primary action class of the original motion. A mathematical model capable of defining both the action class and the style class is proposed and based on the model, the conversion data are computed. A series of piece-wise time warping procedures are conducted prior to employing the defined transformation function. Using this technique, there would be no need for a new set of motion data to be captured or keyframed as the original motion data can be altered to show the desired style.
Design strategies for ultra-low power 10 nm FinFETs

A. Walke,G. Schlenvogt,S. Kurinec

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSE.2017.06.012

2017-10-01

Abstract:
Evaluation of EMIT methods for the determination of the five major antiepileptic drugs on an automated kinetic analyser.

H. Malkus,J. Dicesare,J. M. Meola,C. Pippenger,J. Ibanez,A. Castro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9120(78)90298-9

IF: 3.625

Clinical Biochemistry

Abstract:
Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Xiaowei Wang,Gaoyang Cao,Weifang Mao,Weifeng Lao,Chao He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_533_18

2020-01-01

Abstract:This study aimed to compare clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Yahoo, and Google Scholar databases for relevant articles published up to 2017. Studies based on comparability between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer were designated. Clinical outcomes included operative time, conversion to open surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), bowel function recovery time, length of hospital stay (LOS), anastomosis leak, and postoperative complications. Oncological outcomes comprised the number of lymph nodes extracted, the positive circumferential margin (PCRM), and the distal resection margin (DRM).Twenty studies were designated totaling 5496 patients, comprising a robot-assisted surgery patient group (n = 2168, 39.4%) and a laparoscopic surgery patient group (n = 3328, 60.6%). The robot-assisted surgery group was associated with longer operative time (odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.14, 0.82), lower conversion to open surgery rate (OR 0.55, 95% CI; 0.44, 0.69), shorter LOS (OR - 0.15, 95% CI; -0.30, 0.00), faster bowel function recovery (OR - 0.38, 95% CI; -0.74, -0.02), and lower postoperative complications (OR 0.79, 95% CI; 0.65, 0.97). EBL, anastomosis leak rate, and oncological outcomes including the number of lymph nodes extracted, the DRM, and the PCRM showed no significant differences between groups.Robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer showed longer operative time, lower conversion, faster bowel function recovery rates, and shorter hospital stay, and similar oncological outcomes compared to laparoscopic surgery.
Evaluating the Differences of Wound Related Complications in Robotically Assisted Radical Cystectomy vs Open Radical Cystectomy

Carson Taber,Brennan Lee,Robin Djang,Erin Shone,Julie Perry,Sanjay G. Patel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.05.026

IF: 2.633

2024-06-20

Urology

Abstract:OBJECTIVE To determine whether robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC) or RARC with extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) would result in a decreased rate of surgical site complications. RARC has been shown to be non-inferior to ORC. Both RARC and ORC are complicated by a high rate of perioperative morbidity, including wound-related complications, which may be decreased by a robotic approach with intracorporeal diversion. METHODS A retrospective review of our bladder cancer database for patients undergoing radical cystectomy from 2013-2021. Patients were stratified by surgical technique as RARC with ICUD vs ORC vs RARC with ECUD. Surgical site complications were measured at both 30- and 90-day intervals. RESULTS Of the 269 patients, 127 (47.2%) had RARC with ICUD, 118 (43.7%) had ORC, and 24 (8.9%) had RARC with ECUD (mean ages 71.0, 69.5, and 67.5, respectively). A comparison of the 3 groups demonstrated statistical significance at both the 30-day ( P <.001) and 90-day ( P <.001) timeframes for total surgical site complications, with RARC with ICUD having the fewest amount of patients experiencing a surgical site complication (0.8%) followed by ORC (25.4%) and RARC with ECUD (29.2%). CONCLUSION Overall, we observed lower surgical site complication rates among patients undergoing RARC with ICUD compared to patients who underwent ORC or RARC with ECUD. This study suggests that decreased surgical site complications may be one benefit of the minimally invasive approach, particularly in patients at high risk for surgical site complications after radical cystectomy.

urology & nephrology
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy

Bertram Yuh,Timothy Wilson,Bernie Bochner,Kevin Chan,Joan Palou,Arnulf Stenzl,Francesco Montorsi,George Thalmann,Khurshid Guru,James W F Catto,Peter N Wiklund,Giacomo Novara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008

Abstract:Context: Although open radical cystectomy (ORC) is still the standard approach, laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are increasingly performed. Objective: To report on a systematic literature review and cumulative analysis of pathologic, oncologic, and functional outcomes of RARC in comparison with ORC and LRC. Evidence acquisition: Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched using a free-text protocol including the terms robot-assisted radical cystectomy or da Vinci radical cystectomy or robot* radical cystectomy. RARC case series and studies comparing RARC with either ORC or LRC were collected. A cumulative analysis was conducted. Evidence synthesis: The searches retrieved 105 papers, 87 of which reported on pathologic, oncologic, or functional outcomes. Most series were retrospective and had small case numbers, short follow-up, and potential patient selection bias. The lymph node yield during lymph node dissection was 19 (range: 3-55), with half of the series following an extended template (yield range: 11-55). The lymph node-positive rate was 22%. The performance of lymphadenectomy was correlated with surgeon and institutional volume. Cumulative analyses showed no significant difference in lymph node yield between RARC and ORC. Positive surgical margin (PSM) rates were 5.6% (1-1.5% in pT2 disease and 0-25% in pT3 and higher disease). PSM rates did not appear to decrease with sequential case numbers. Cumulative analyses showed no significant difference in rates of surgical margins between RARC and ORC or RARC and LRC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use ranged from 0% to 31%, with adjuvant chemotherapy used in 4-29% of patients. Only six series reported a mean follow-up of >36 mo. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 67-76%, 68-83%, and 61-80%, respectively. The 5-yr DFS, CSS, and OS rates were 53-74%, 66-80%, and 39-66%, respectively. Similar to ORC, disease of higher pathologic stage or evidence of lymph node involvement was associated with worse survival. Very limited data were available with respect to functional outcomes. The 12-mo continence rates with continent diversion were 83-100% in men for daytime continence and 66-76% for nighttime continence. In one series, potency was recovered in 63% of patients who were evaluable at 12 mo. Conclusions: Oncologic and functional data from RARC remain immature, and longer-term prospective studies are needed. Cumulative analyses demonstrated that lymph node yields and PSM rates were similar between RARC and ORC. Conclusive long-term survival outcomes for RARC were limited, although oncologic outcomes up to 5 yr were similar to those reported for ORC. Patient summary: Although open radical cystectomy (RC) is still regarded as the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, laparoscopic and robot-assisted RCs are becoming more popular. Templates of lymph node dissection, lymph node yields, and positive surgical margin rates are acceptable with robot-assisted RC. Although definitive comparisons with open RC with respect to oncologic or functional outcomes are lacking, early results appear comparable.
Perioperative and Complication-Related Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Comparative NSQIP Analysis

Rishabh Kumar Simhal,Daniel P Simon,Kerith R Wang,Yash B. Shah,Brandon Havranek,James Ryan Mark,Thenappan Chandrasekar,Mihir S Shah,Costas D Lallas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2023.0279

2024-01-26

Journal of Endourology

Abstract:Radical cystectomy (RC) is standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, but it comes with significant perioperative risk. Currently, both open radical cystectomies (ORC) and RARC are frequently performed. Using newly available data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP), we aim to compare 30-day outcomes between patients who received ORC or RARC, representing one of the largest, most recent multi-institutional studies comparing these operative approaches. RC procedures performed between 2019-2021 were identified in NSQIP. Cases in the ORC group were planned open procedures, and cases in the RARC group were robotic-assisted, including unplanned conversion to open cases for intention-to-treat. Chi-square and t-tests were performed to compare baseline demographics and operative parameters. Multivariate analysis was performed for outcomes including major complications, minor complications, and 30-day mortality, while adjusting for baseline differences significant on univariate analysis. 5,343 RC cases were identified. Of these 70% underwent planned ORC while 30% received RARC. RARC was associated with longer operative times and shorter hospital length of stay compared to ORC. On multivariate analysis, there was no difference between the cohorts in 30-day rates of major complications, hospital readmissions, need for reoperation, or mortality. ORC was however associated with higher rates of minor complications, bleeding, superficial surgical site infections, and anastomotic leak. In the NSQIP database, ORC is associated with higher rates of 30- day minor complications, most notably bleeding, compared to RARC. However, there is no difference in regards to perioperative major morbidity or mortality. This study is unique in the size of the cohorts compared, the timeliness of the data (2019-2021), applicability to a variety of different practice settings across the country, and the ability to control for factors, such as type of urinary diversion, pathological bladder cancer staging, as well as use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

urology & nephrology
Clinical Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Patients with Bladder Cancer: a Retrospective Study

Bai Yuchen,Wang Shuai,Zheng Wei,Li EnHui,Quan Jing,Wei Fei,Zhang Qi,Qi XiaoLong,Zhang DaHong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01382-1

2021-01-01

BMC Surgery

Abstract:Abstract Background With the development of minimally invasive surgery technology, patients with bladder cancer are increasingly receiving laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) or robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) treatment. The main purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of bladder cancer patients treated with LRC versus RARC. Methods A retrospective study to identify patients with clinical stage Ta/T1/Tis to T3 bladder cancer who underwent RARC or LRC has been performed. The perioperative outcome, recurrence, and overall survival (OS) of the two surgical methods were compared. Results 218 patients were identified from March 2010 to December 2019 in our department, which including 82 (38%) patients who received LRC and 136 (62%) patients who received RARC. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of lymph node collection, lymph node positive rate, resection margin positive rate, and postoperative pathological staging. Compared with the LRC group, patients in the RARC group had a median estimated blood loss (180 vs. 250 ml; P = 0.02) and reduced complications at 90 days postoperatively (30.8% vs. 46.3%; P = 0.01). Recurrence, all-cause death, and cancer-specific death occurred in 77 (35%), 55 (25%), and 39 (18%) patients, respectively. The 5-year OS rate was 54.63% and 54.65% in the RARC and LRC group (P > 0.05). The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was 73.32% and 61.55% in RARC and LRC group (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.083, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.626–1.874; P = 0.78], and CSS (HR 0.789, 95%CI 0.411–1.515; P = 0.61) between two groups. Conclusions Both RARC and LRC were safe and effective with a similar long-term clinical outcomes. Moreover, RARC had significantly lower median estimated blood loss and reduced postoperative complications.
Discussion on exophthalmos and endocrine disturbance.

W. R. Brain

Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine

Abstract:
Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Bernard H Bochner,Guido Dalbagni,Daniel D Sjoberg,Jonathan Silberstein,Gal E Keren Paz,S Machele Donat,Jonathan A Coleman,Sheila Mathew,Andrew Vickers,Geoffrey C Schnorr,Michael A Feuerstein,Bruce Rapkin,Raul O Parra,Harry W Herr,Vincent P Laudone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043

Abstract:Background: Open radical cystectomy (ORC) and urinary diversion in patients with bladder cancer (BCa) are associated with significant perioperative complication risk. Objective: To compare perioperative complications between robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and ORC techniques. Design, setting, and participants: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted during 2010 and 2013 in BCa patients scheduled for definitive treatment by radical cystectomy (RC), pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), and urinary diversion. Patients were randomized to ORC/PLND or RARC/PLND, both with open urinary diversion. Patients were followed for 90 d postoperatively. Intervention: Standard ORC or RARC with PLND; all urinary diversions were performed via an open approach. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Primary outcomes were overall 90-d grade 2-5 complications defined by a modified Clavien system. Secondary outcomes included comparison of high-grade complications, estimated blood loss, operative time, pathologic outcomes, 3- and 6-mo patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes, and total operative room and inpatient costs. Differences in binary outcomes were assessed with the chi-square test, with differences in continuous outcomes assessed by analysis of covariance with randomization group as covariate and, for QOL end points, baseline score. Results and limitations: The trial enrolled 124 patients, of whom 118 were randomized and underwent RC/PLND. Sixty were randomized to RARC and 58 to ORC. At 90 d, grade 2-5 complications were observed in 62% and 66% of RARC and ORC patients, respectively (95% confidence interval for difference, -21% to -13%; p=0.7). The similar rates of grade 2-5 complications at our mandated interim analysis met futility criteria; thus, early closure of the trial occurred. The RARC group had lower mean intraoperative blood loss (p=0.027) but significantly longer operative time than the ORC group (p<0.001). Pathologic variables including positive surgical margins and lymph node yields were similar. Mean hospital stay was 8 d in both arms (standard deviation, 3 and 5 d, respectively; p=0.5). Three- and 6-mo QOL outcomes were similar between arms. Cost analysis demonstrated an advantage to ORC compared with RARC. A limitation is the setting at a single high-volume, referral center; our findings may not be generalizable to all settings. Conclusions: This trial failed to identify a large advantage for robot-assisted techniques over standard open surgery for patients undergoing RC/PLND and urinary diversion. Similar 90-d complication rates, hospital stay, pathologic outcomes, and 3- and 6-mo QOL outcomes were observed regardless of surgical technique. Patient summary: Of 118 patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection, and urinary diversion, half were randomized to open surgery and half to robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. We compared the rate of complications within 90 d after surgery for the open group versus the robotic group and found no significant difference between the two groups. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01076387, www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Comparative effectiveness of robot‐assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

Pierre‐Etienne Gabriel,Ugo Pinar,Louis Lenfant,Jérôme Parra,Christophe Vaessen,Pierre Mozer,Emmanuel Chartier‐Kastler,Morgan Rouprêt,Thomas Seisen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16565

2024-10-23

BJU International

Abstract:Objectives To assess the comparative effectiveness of robot‐assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) vs open radical cystectomy (ORC) for bladder cancer (BC). Patients and Methods We conducted a real‐life monocentric study including all consecutive patients who underwent RARC with ICUD or ORC for BC at our institution from 2014 to 2023. Uni‐ and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to compare perioperative, oncological and stricture outcomes between both groups by calculating odds (ORs) and hazard (HRs) ratios with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. Results Overall, 316 patients underwent either RARC with ICUD (n = 228 [72.2%]) or ORC (n = 88 [27.8%]). The perioperative benefits of RARC vs ORC included decreased risks of major blood loss (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04–0.23; P

urology & nephrology
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes.

Shiqiang Su,Liangyou Gu,Xin Ma,Hongzhao Li,Baojun Wang,Taoping Shi,Xu Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2019.06.007

IF: 3.121

2019-01-01

Clinical Genitourinary Cancer

Abstract:BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes between laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for bladder cancer (BCa).MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients who underwent LRC or RARC with curative intent for BCa between January 2011 and December 2016 were included. Perioperative, pathologic oncologic data were extracted from our database. Disease-free survival, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank tests.RESULTS:A total of 126 patients underwent LRC and 189 patients underwent RARC during the study period. All the baseline variables were similar between the two groups. Patients undergoing RARC had a significant higher median estimated blood loss (300 mL vs. 200 mL; P = .005), lower rate of 90-day postoperative complications (36.5% vs. 50.0%; P = .017), and higher median direct cost ($15,306 vs. $11,131; P < .001) than LRC. Other perioperative outcomes were similar. No differences were found in pathologic T stage, positive lymph nodes, or positive surgical margin between patients who underwent LRC and RARC. The 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival rates were 51.9%, 61.0%, and 69.5%, respectively, for all included patients. There were no significant differences in oncologic outcomes between the 2 groups.CONCLUSION:Patients with BCa can be safely managed with LRC and RARC by experienced surgeons. RARC was associated with a reduced rate of postoperative complication but also with higher median estimated blood loss, and higher median direct cost. These findings could be used to guide patient counseling, and treatment selection.
Clinical Outcomes of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Before Versus after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

Shuai Wang,Dahong Zhang,Yuchen Bai,Feng Liu,Xiaolong Qi,Liping Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0118

2023-01-01

Abstract:Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of bladder cancer patients treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) before or after cystectomy under robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).Methods: A retrospective study to identify 348 patients with bladder cancer who underwent RARC was performed. Of the patients, 152 (42.8%) underwent ePLND before radical cystectomy (RC) (group A) and 196 (56.3%) underwent ePLND after RC (group B). The clinical, pathological, and overall survival were compared.Results: The total and RC operation time in Group A (total: 130.68 +/- 29.25 minutes, RC: 59.45 +/- 28.63 minutes) were both shorter than Group B (total: 154.17 +/- 38.18 minutes, RC: 94.81 +/- 41.21 minutes) (P < .05). However, no significant difference in time of ePLND. The estimate blood loss (EBL) of RC part and total operation (RC+ePLND) in group A was less than group B (both P < .05), while the ePLND part did not show significance. The result of vascular and nerve injury and surgical drain withdrawal time were similar in two groups. The total number of lymph nodes in group A was fewer than group B (16 versus 26; P < .05). Moreover, the number of bilateral internal iliac and presacral lymph nodes of group A was fewer than group B significantly, whereas the number of bilateral external iliac, common iliac, and obturator lymph nodes was similar in two groups. The lymph node density of group A was significantly lower than group B. The median follow-up of all patients was 33.0 months. Importantly, the survival of group B was better than group A (hazard ratio: 1.412; 95% confidence interval: 1.004-1.987; P = .048).Conclusions: Performing ePLND before RC reveals better result on operation time and EBL, while, when ePLND after RC, the total number of lymph nodes dissected is more and the survival is better. It recommended ePLND be performed before RC, and it is necessary to recheck the internal iliac and presacral area after cystectomy.
Comparative Outcomes of Open Radical Cystectomy vs. Robot-Assisted Approaches with Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion: A Meta-Analysis and Network Meta-Analysis of Perioperative and Quality of Life Outcomes

Rocco Simone Flammia,Leslie Claire Licari,Eugenio Bologna,Riccardo Mastroianni,Flavia Proietti,Gabriele Tuderti,Umberto Anceschi,Aldo Brassetti,Antonio Franco,Cosimo De Nunzio,Riccardo Autorino,Costantino Leonardo,Giuseppe Simone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082421

2024-04-21

Abstract:Background: To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs that compare outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intra- or extracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD or ECUD) and the standard open approach (oRC). Methods: A systematic review identified RCTs including patients aged >18 years with non-metastatic bladder cancer treated with RARC (ICUD or ECUD) vs. oRC and reporting peri- and post-operative outcomes and quality of life (QoL) assessment. Standard and network metanalyses were performed. Results: Data from 1024 patients included in eight RCTs were analyzed. The standard meta-analysis found that RARC had longer OT, lower EBL, and a lower transfusion rate compared to oRC (all p < 0.001). No significant differences in terms of LOS between the ICUD vs. ECUD vs. ORC were recorded. RARC patients demonstrated better scores in fatigue, insomnia, pain, physical functioning, and role functioning-according to QoL assessment-compared to ORC at early follow-up, despite no difference at baselines. Finally, at network metanalysis, ICUD (OR = 0.74, p < 0.001) but not ECUD (OR = 0.92, p < 0.08) yielded a lower rate of high-grade 90-day complications compared to ORC despite longer OT (MD = 89.56, p = 0.0351). Conclusions: RARC represents a safe and feasible option to reduce perioperative bleeding with no definitive impact on LOS compared to ORC. Interestingly, ICUD may reduce the burden of 90-day complications to a greater extent than ECUD. Nonetheless, surgeons should be aware of the extended OT and steep learning curve of ICUD. Finally, RARC may provide some short-term benefits in terms of QoL, but more research is needed to determine its long-term effects.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting early outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy.

Kaiwen Li,Tianxin Lin,Xinxiang Fan,Kewei Xu,Liangkuan Bi,Yu Duan,Yu Zhou,Min Yu,Jielin Li,Jian Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.11.007

IF: 13.608

2013-01-01

Cancer Treatment Reviews

Abstract:Background: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is increasingly being used in the management of bladder cancer. Studies comparing RARC and open radical cystectomy (ORC) have reported conflicting results. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the efficacy and advantages of RARC compared with ORC.
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of its differential effect on effectiveness and safety

Shi Fu,HongJin Shi,Zhinan Fan,Jinze Li,Ting Luan,Haonan Dong,Jincheng Wang,Shuwen Chen,Jinsong Zhang,Jiansong Wang,Mingxia Ding,Haifeng Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000001065

2024-01-11

International Journal of Surgery

Abstract:Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) is increasingly being used in recent years. Whether iRARC offers advantages over open radical cystectomy (ORC) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the difference of perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes and complications between iRARC and ORC. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CNKI databases were searched in July 2023 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies were identified to be eligible if they compared perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes and complications in patients who underwent iRARC with ORC. Results: Twenty-two studies involving 7,020 patients were included. Compared to ORC, iRARC was superior for estimated blood loss [EBL WMD: −555.52; 95% CI, −681.64 to −429.39; P <0.001], blood transfusion rate [OR: 0.16; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.28; P <0.001], length of hospital stay [LOS WMD: −2.05; 95% CI, −2.93 to −1.17; P <0.001], Clavien-Dindo grades ≥III complication rate [30d: OR: 0.57; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.75; P <0.001; 90d: OR: 0.71; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.84; P <0.001], and positive surgical margin [PSM OR: 0.65; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.85; P =0.002]. However, iRARC had a longer operative time [OT WMD: 68.54; 95%CI 47.41 to 89.67; P <0.001] and a higher rate of ureteroenteric stricture [ UES OR: 1.56; 95% CI 1.16 to 2.11; P =0.003]. Time to flatus, time to bowel, time to regular diet, readmission rate, Clavien-Dindo grades<III complication rate for iRARC were similar to that for ORC. Interestingly, the results of subgroup analysis revealed no difference in EBL between iRARC and ORC when the diversion type was neobladder. When the ileal conduit was selected as the diversion type, the LOS was similar in both procedures. Conclusion: Robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion appears to be superior to open radical cystectomy in terms of effectiveness and safety. However, attention should be paid to the occurrence of ureteroenteric stricture during follow-up.

surgery

Rasmussen's encephalitis: an autoimmune disorder?

Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparison Of Perioperative Outcomes In Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy And Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

[Cloning of group A streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin-B gene and its recombinant protein expression in culture supernatant].

Robot-assisted vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults

Modeling and Transformation of 3D Human Motion

Design strategies for ultra-low power 10 nm FinFETs

Evaluation of EMIT methods for the determination of the five major antiepileptic drugs on an automated kinetic analyser.

Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evaluating the Differences of Wound Related Complications in Robotically Assisted Radical Cystectomy vs Open Radical Cystectomy

Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy

Perioperative and Complication-Related Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Comparative NSQIP Analysis

Clinical Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Patients with Bladder Cancer: a Retrospective Study

Discussion on exophthalmos and endocrine disturbance.

Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Comparative effectiveness of robot‐assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

Comparison of Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Before Versus after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

Comparative Outcomes of Open Radical Cystectomy vs. Robot-Assisted Approaches with Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion: A Meta-Analysis and Network Meta-Analysis of Perioperative and Quality of Life Outcomes

Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting early outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy.

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of its differential effect on effectiveness and safety