Rabies post-exposure prophylactic vaccination for returning travelers to Japan

Kei Yamamoto,Mugen Ujiie,Akira Noguchi,Yasuyuki Kato,Yoshihiro Fujiya,Momoko Mawatari,Satoshi Kutsuna,Nozomi Takeshita,Kayoko Hayakawa,Shuzo Kanagawa,Satoshi Inoue,Shigeru Morikawa,Norio Ohmagari
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2019.05.004
Abstract:Background: Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in Japan is administered using 6 subcutaneous doses (on days 0, 3, 7, 14, 30, and 90), which is not in line with international recommendations of 4 or 5 intramuscular doses. For reducing dose frequency, we evaluate the immunogenicity of PEP with a regimen of 6 subcutaneous doses. Method: This prospective single-center cross-sectional study was performed between September 2013 and December 2014. We included patients underwent rabies PEP by purified chick embryo-cultured rabies vaccine Kaketsuken (PCEC-K) at our clinic, and excluded patients with a history of pre-exposure prophylaxis or PEP using rabies immunoglobulin. The rabies virus-neutralizing antibody tests were performed at the first visit to our office (doses 1-4) and at the fifth and sixth doses. Results: Data were available for 43 of 59 enrolled patients. Thirty-two patients did not start PEP within 48 h after exposure to animals. The seroprotection rates (≥0.5 IU/mL) were 90.7% and 75.7%, at days 30 and 90, respectively. Despite receiving a fifth dose, 85.3% of the patients exhibited decreasing antibody titers during days 30-90 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The seroprotection rates of PCEC-K induced subcutaneously were insufficient to prevent rabies at day 30 and 90.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?