Abstract:This paper explores a novel philosophy of ethical care in the face of burgeoning biomedical technologies. I respond to a serious challenge facing traditional bioethics with its roots in analytic philosophy. The hallmarks of these traditional approaches are reason and autonomy, founded on a belief in the liberal humanist subject. In recent years, however, there have been mounting challenges to this view of human subjectivity, emerging from poststructuralist critiques, such as Michel Foucault's, but increasingly also as a result of advances in biotechnology itself. In the face of these developments, I argue that the theoretical relevance and practical application of mainstream bioethics is increasingly under strain. Traditionalists will undoubtedly resist. Together, professional philosopher-bioethicists, public health policymakers, and the global commercial healthcare industry tend to respond conservatively by shoring up the liberal humanist subject as the foundation for medical ethics and consumer decision-making, appealing to the familiar tropes of reason, autonomy, and freedom.I argue for a different approach to bioethics, and work towards a new way to conceive of ethical relations in healthcare--one that does not presume a sovereign subject as the basis of dignity, personhood or democracy. Instead, I am critical of the narrow instantiations of reason, autonomy, and freedom, which, more recently, have been co-opted by a troubling neo-liberal politics of the self. Thus, I am critical of current trends in medical ethics, often running in tandem with corporate-governmental models of efficiency, accountability, and so-called evidence-based best practices. As an example of such market-driven conceptions of subjectivity, I discuss the paradigm of "self-care." Self-care shores up the traditional view of the self as a free agent. In this sense, self-care is looked upon favourably by mainstream bioethics in its focus on autonomy, while healthcare policy endorses this model for ideological and economic reasons. To contrast this, I propose a different model of care together with a different model of selfhood. Here I develop and apply Foucault's late work on the "care of the self." In this understanding of "care," I suggest that we might work towards an ethical self that is more commensurable both with recent theoretical views on subjectivity and--more pressingly--with the challenges of emergent biotechnologies. I end this paper with a discussion on ethical parenthood, which offers a practical reading of the "care of the self" in relation to new reproductive technologies (NRTs).

Tying care and respect into a single bioethical principle: On Dall'Agnol's respectful care theory

Empathic care as a command of a new clinical bioethics

End of Life: Care Ethical Perspectives

Hard times, hard choices: founding bioethics today

Care and the self: biotechnology, reproduction, and the good life

Why patients have a moral obligation to give care to clinicians

Intercultural caring-an abductive model

Practising the ethics of person‐centred care balancing ethical conviction and moral obligations

Harms to dignity, bioethics, and the scope of biolaw

Modern Ideas of Caring in Nursing Practices

WHEN I READ CAROL GILLIGAN’S IN A DIFFERENT VOICE

A Theory of Bioethics

Enriching evaluation practice through care ethics

The care encounter: pondering caring, honest communication and control

Quality of life and ethics: A concept analysis

Nursing ethics as a distinct entity within bioethics: Implications for clinical ethics practice

[The interweaving of threads in the fabric of care]

Care biography: A concept analysis

When the Dying Person Looks Me in the Face: An Ethics of Responsibility for Dealing With the Problem of the Patient in a Persistent Vegetative State

The trouble with caring: a review of eight arguments against an ethic of care

What Is Caring in Nursing?: Sorting Out Humanistic and Christian Perspectives